Job Recruitment Website - Ranking of immigration countries - When the house is demolished, the demolition personnel and court policemen often encounter insults from residents. How to fundamentally solve this problem?

When the house is demolished, the demolition personnel and court policemen often encounter insults from residents. How to fundamentally solve this problem?

Demolition negotiation When negotiating demolition compensation and resettlement, the demolition court usually has disputes with its citizens.

1. In order to put pressure on the families of migrant workers, some local governments will take some measures, such as studying social relations and holding close negotiations with relatives of the government and state-owned enterprises to prevent them from working. Use the land, planning and urban management law enforcement departments to determine whether your house is illegal, whether there are illegal acts, or whether you do not cooperate with the demolition, forcibly take back illegal buildings or impose administrative penalties on you. Because of stalking, intimidation and harassment, the demolition company will be forced to move. Even some government employees will be cut off from electricity, gas and water. Obvious color removal is an insufficient method, but it is enough to withstand great pressure. 2. My thinking has collapsed. The demolition personnel have received professional training in advance, and negotiation is their job. Immigrant families are usually ordinary people, and their understanding of negotiation, compensation, demolition procedures and rights protection obligations is rarely half baked. The strength of the two sides is very different. Demolition agents usually scramble to gradually disintegrate the mind of the moved furniture, and the moved furniture basically has no strategy.

3. Due to the asymmetry of information and psychological quality, families who immigrate to protect their own rights and interests usually only consider the amount they want to compensate, while the number of immigrant families compensated by neighbors is usually irrational, such as losing their character and gathering people to make trouble. It seems to be a petition, an oath or even a lifelong struggle, but it often has little effect. Some people are too radical or subject to administrative punishment, and their families can't bear the pressure during detention. Even if the final negotiations fail, the government will take compulsory procedures. The result of disassembly can be imagined.

Therefore, to fundamentally solve the dispute with residents, we should start with the concept, guide residents to treat the demolition reasonably, and at the same time increase the compensation, so that residents can feel that their rights and interests have been protected.