How does Tsinghua University treat Wu Guosheng?

Yesterday, I wrote a sentence in the title. I said: Wu Guosheng, Matsuda and Liu Huajie were famous "anti-science trio" a long time ago. A friend was a little confused when he saw it. He asked the group what was going on. It happened that Wu Guosheng criticized "Three-body" in the group. It is reported that Wu Guosheng, a professor in Tsinghua University, has caused controversy in his evaluation of Three-body: he said that the popularity of Three-body surprised him, and he thought that science fiction performed poorly in all literary subjects. It just uses some scientific elements conveniently, but what really touches people is the humanity in the story.

So, what is Wu Guosheng's so-called human nature? In fact, I have known Wu Guosheng for many years, and I know his thoughts very well. It can basically be summarized as: 1. Respect for nature, so science should "follow the rules"; 2. Advocating returning to the countryside and rejecting industrialization; 3. Greek rational scientific thought cannot evolve into science, and Christianity is the mother of science. Without Christianity, modern science could not have been born. The more science develops, the more people lose value, not liberate value.

Therefore, Wu Guosheng's so-called "humanity" revolves around the above points. However, there is nothing in Liu's works that he likes-theological respect and "humanity" to save the universe-and it is normal that he doesn't like it. The cold, cruel and competitive world revealed by Liu's "Three-body" will not be annoying, but it will certainly make this so-called humanistic intellectual feel uncomfortable. Wu Guosheng claimed to study the history of science, but he studied science all his life just to prove the supreme importance of religion in the development of the history of science. His "academic standard" is very high, and his words and sentences are dazzling, but in the final analysis, his purpose is the same as Song Tian's, that is, to belittle the importance of science, let science respect religion, or at least accept the leadership of philosophy. Denying it is "scientism" and "scientific hegemony". He believes that such science means "not fearing nature" and will inevitably lead to the loss of self-existence value. It can be said that Wu Guosheng is a traditional humanist who is more hidden, scientific and anti-scientific than Song Tian.

Regarding Wu Guosheng's criticism that "Three-body" has no "humanity", Shen Peng published an article on this the day before yesterday and wrote:

Wu Guosheng's thought was formed in 1980s, and some things of that era have been deeply rooted in their minds. If you look at his so-called "history of science and technology", it is actually the "history of science and technology" of western centralism. In his view, the West is a galaxy from ideology to culture ... Wu Guosheng may only see the "progress by hook or by crook" in Three-body. He thinks this is "inhuman", but in fact he doesn't see the tragic beauty of human persistence, struggle, game and sacrifice as a weak person. This is also "human nature", and this is the real "educational years". Wu Guosheng is a standard "reflective school", and he thinks that the greatest function of literary works is "reflection". He said, "Western science fiction literature reveals the possible adverse consequences of science by means of science fiction and prophecy, while China science fiction literature lacks such reflection, which is basically a passion for science." There is a little reflection represented by "Three-body", but it is not enough. "When I heard Liu's words, I was afraid I wouldn't die laughing. The three-body is indeed "rethinking", but it is not rethinking "the possible adverse consequences of science." But to reflect on "science is not advanced enough and human beings are not strong enough?" "Consequences.

/images 0 1/202 10603/6904 cf 62367 e 4 17986 b 5 1667933543 CB . JPEG