What is the anti-epidemic ability of the United States? Don't the American people know?

Some people's values hold that freedom is more important than life.

I asked why I didn't mention the cure rate, but always reported how many cases were reported today, how many cases died, how many cases were cured and how many cases were discharged. Don't worry about COVID-19 in the United States. The national conditions are different. Just take care of your own country. People just feel a cold.

Because they regard the disease as a big flu, only severe cases can be cured, so there is no medical run. Besides, Americans have better living conditions than China, and most of them live in villas. It is also possible to isolate mild cases at home. For mild patients in China, they must live in shelters.

Strong people live a good life, how can they have the life of the American bottom people in their eyes? Besides, as a nation, it is not clear and there is no need to care. Therefore, Trump is particularly uncomfortable and can understand foreign immigrants.

Friends say that relatives and friends in America are happy every day and nothing happens! I can't answer the phone. When I think of the worst epidemic in Wuhan, as a China native, I am very worried and shed a lot of tears. Now, in COVID-19, 654.38+900,000 people have died, but they are very happy. Is it true?/You don't say.

The efficiency and control of the local government are so poor that it is impossible to control the epidemic with the ability of the local government. Democracy and freedom are bullshit, which gives me the feeling that they really have no intention to control the epidemic! Americans seem to feel that they have nothing to do with the death of Americans, especially Chinese Americans, but it is emotionally unacceptable for China people to know that so many China people have died.

According to the statistics of the United States, the death toll is 200,000, but the government says it's okay, and everyone thinks it's okay. In fact, the mortality rate is only 4%, which really doesn't matter.

The epidemic itself is a medical problem, but a large-scale serious outbreak is not only a medical problem in all countries and regions of the world, but also a social and political problem that needs to be faced together. It needs global coordination and cooperation, resolutely avoids panic, cannot be politicized, and becomes a profit-making tool for politicians and interest groups. No matter how different the national conditions are, people-oriented and life-oriented are universal values and should be followed together. Only in this way can we effectively deal with the epidemic, safeguard life, maintain stability and promote development. However, reality and ideal are two different things. We must first be ourselves, and at the same time deal with all kinds of severe challenges brought about by the global outbreak of the epidemic in the era of great change.

My hands and feet are in favor of the epidemic response measures taken by the United States and Trump's election as president for the second term and the third and fourth terms. I also appreciate the freedom of American people to choose without masks. If there is such a person in China, I'm sorry, don't let me see you. Every time I see them, I will hit them.

What do you mean the United States uses methods to improve immunity? Improving immunity is a natural law for most people to be infected, and the result is that they can't live if they can't live. Is this still the way? This is how the animal kingdom survives the fittest. It is scientific to treat infectious diseases and isolate and control the source of infection. Don't worship foreign things, the moon in foreign countries is round, and the United States is not as good as China in this respect.

China's worldview is different from that of the United States. America advocates elites, and money makes the mare go. Now China puts all the people first, and respects life and the right to life. In this epidemic, many senior officials and rich people in the United States died of the epidemic. If we look at China, we have basically realized the same right to life. Otherwise, how many ordinary people have given up their right to life like low-income students in the United States? This is called group immunity!

If China uses the anti-epidemic methods of the United States for reference and calculates the infection rate in the United States, more than 20 million people have been diagnosed in China and nearly 800,000 people have died in China. Hehe, can China people tolerate this situation? Of course, what if China did not take decisive measures earlier, but acted like the United States? Good and bad, isn't it obvious? Is there anything else to discuss?

Americans really think differently. At first, they certainly didn't notice. They know nothing about the virus. They hardly wear masks in news photos. Later, more and more people wore masks, indicating that they were afraid, but not enough to die. And their public opinion is also very strange. Someone actually injected disinfectant after listening to a special TV speech.

With the basic medical insurance for ordinary people, the hospital will not accept hospitalization and go home to isolate itself. Because of the high cost of treatment, the poor in America can't afford it! Patients, so the United States is seriously infected. The United States engages in natural immunity! China patients are all hospitalized and isolated!

Yes, the American media is private, and so is the President of the United States. They are all controlled by big consortia. No matter the parties, public opinion and government are controlled by the big consortia, the presidential election is held, but the election needs money and there is no money to support it. No matter how good your ideas and abilities are, who will know and vote for you? So all this is inseparable from money, and the American consortium controls everything, including world finance.

As a result, many people in China regard fighting the epidemic as the standard to measure a country's strength, from which it is concluded that the United States has returned to the agricultural society since then, and China immediately became the world's number one power.