Why doesn't anyone dare point a gun at my head?

The "jing cheng si shao" conflict between Wen and Yu Xiaoping and the beating of Li Shuangjiang's son have been heated up in China. Both of these incidents have one thing in common, that is, privilege license plate and guns. China closed the gun-related forum after the kitchen knife real-name registration system, banned guns, banned knives, and then went one step further to ban words. What does this mean? Explain that you are afraid, afraid to the point where even toy guns are frightening. When the fake privilege license plate is combined with the toy gun, it plays the role of mutual proof. As long as it can be associated with privileges in China, it will definitely scare others, because they have unequal opportunities with everyone. Therefore, it is more like a fallen city, where privileges and violence are rampant. If fake license plates and fake guns threaten ordinary people, what are some people afraid of? It's like criminal B wearing the mask of criminal A to rape others. Criminal A will be very angry because he is a rapist. Even if he didn't do it, he will become the target of public criticism. Of course, he should be afraid. If you wear a lady's mask to rape, she certainly doesn't have to worry, because she doesn't have the ability or the function. So recently, fake military cards and fake guns have been closely checked. In fact, these masks are not the fundamental problem. North China is seen by Americans as a place where guns are rampant. Why doesn't anyone dare to point a gun at my head? Because I also have a gun-this is not accurate, in essence, I have equal gun rights. In Canada, I am a so-called immigrant. Soon after I came to settle in Canada, I got a gun license, and any legal resident has the opportunity to apply. The purpose of the application is to let you know about the relevant laws after a training in safe gun holding. Including all the gunmen of new immigrants, not only the cultural background is completely different from that of whites, but even the language is not as fluent as that of locals, not to mention the complicated legal provisions. However, the Canadian government first gives everyone the same rights as whites, which is an environment without worrying about being bullied by others. The so-called equality of all people in western society, which I often expound, refers to equality of opportunity, which has been deliberately confused in China. In other words, everyone can have the right to hold a gun, which makes it unnecessary for everyone to buy a gun to protect themselves. What is this concept? For example, a new immigrant has no mind to play with guns after he has just settled down, because there are still many things to do. There are also bad guys among white people. If you never have a chance to hold a gun, he can scare you with a gun, whether it is a real gun or a fake gun. Because you can't get the situation back, and you have the same rights, who knows when you will take a gun to settle accounts with him. Therefore, people who buy guns here are generally not for the purpose of protecting themselves, because there is no need to buy them at any time. You can take the guns and bullets home after paying the money at the gun shop (it takes a working day to go through the formalities for pistols or submachine guns). In a society where you don't have to worry about others holding guns, can you still scare others with guns? No one will wear a police uniform any more. If the police break into an innocent person's house by mistake and are shot and injured, the police station will apologize. This has happened. If you bully people in a police car, you are naturally considered a fake policeman, because real policemen dare not do so. You can bully me with a gun in the neighborhood today, so worry about it from now on. One day I can get justice with a gun. No one dares to bully others, including the police, in this place in North America. In an equal society, if you point a gun at others illegally, it means that there are countless guns pointing at you, which is the sense of security brought by equality. In China, people with guns can always bully others without worrying, and you, a common people, will always be in a state of being bullied. The more vicious this cycle is, the less you need to fantasize that you will have any equal opportunities, because someone will worry about collecting debts after bullying you. We can imagine the final outcome, that is, repeating history and replacing the old violence with new violence. Can't this tragedy be found in China? Equal opportunities not only lead no one to bully others at will, but also completely destroy everyone's idea of rebellion. A government that is not worried about the people overthrowing itself, is it still meaningful for you to overthrow it? According to the propaganda in China in the past, arms dealers colluded with the government to let guns flood for the benefit. Anyone with a little brains will think about it. This at least shows that the government doesn't have to be afraid of the people's rebellion. Needless to say, all the gunmen here unite, as long as 1% of the gunmen unite to overthrow the government, there is no problem at all. Folk marksmanship and ammunition far exceed the police, which are all piled up with money. The government is not stupid enough to disregard its own life for the benefit, is it? Drugs, alcohol and tobacco are definitely better choices according to the concept instilled by the government in China. In a society where guns are rampant, why doesn't anyone get up with guns to overthrow the government? Because there is really no reason. Humans always have to find a reason for everything, right? In fact, civil rebellion is very costly, and it is entirely a bet on life. If it is not forced to despair, there will definitely be no such choice. Not long ago, I saw a tourist from China traveling in Beijing who was mistaken for a petitioner and was beaten up and thrown on the street. Petition has been the last straw for the bullied people, and now people's last glimmer of hope has been put out. Those desperate people can only gamble with their lives. Why put a gun to another man's head? It is to seek benefits from each other. Pointing and being accused represent the strong and the weak. What the government should do is not to let the strong bully the weak. How can this goal be achieved? Is to make everyone strong. China, on the other hand, makes everyone weak and the government the only strong one. Then there will be a situation that even a fool can figure out, that is, relying on the strong tree and colluding with privileges has become the habit of China people in the past 6 years. As long as privileges are not eliminated, there will be no peace in China. Violent repression leads to violent resistance, and any opportunity may lead desperate people to look for opportunities in it. Recently, China invented the term "leading party". This society has made some people desperate. Is it necessary to lead the way? Maybe there is a guide to avoid more bloody scenes. Advocating democratic improvement, reducing privileges, and advocating non-violence and non-cooperation with evil, if these ideas have no market, then what remains is that people are desperate to fight. = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Only with gun rights can a society where everyone is equal be realized. It's like a lion and an antelope can never be equal, but one day the antelope will have the strength and teeth to rival the lion, so they will be equal. The biggest inequality in this magical land is the inequality between the government and the people, that is, the inequality between the government and the people. The constitutional significance of a constitutional country lies in the fact that to build a society where the government and the people are equal from the legal point of view, the government needs the authorization of the people to manage the people. The right to hold a gun is the basis of this kind of legal equality. Without equal armed strength or sufficient threat of force, any equality is a bubble-although you have aircraft artillery nuclear weapons and I only have pistols, I can still fuck you, but when you have aircraft artillery nuclear weapons, I don't even have a kitchen knife. The result can be imagined. The same is true of people, people and officials, people and organizations and political parties. I think this article also sees something I haven't seen through for a long time, that is, the weak balance. Our managers make us reach a weak balance, both from the perspective of equipment and law, but this weakness often makes us feel helpless in the face of illegal acts, such as a thief with a knife breaking into our house in the middle of the night. At this time, you can only be harmed, because people can stab you at any time and run away, but you can't hurt him-I mean, instantly make them lose their ability to resist. . . This is our law.