How to understand the pseudo-Manchu government and the pseudo-Nanjing government from the perspective of historical materialism?

It is said that this was the case at that time. Especially during the puppet Manchukuo period, the puppet Manchukuo government was pro-Japanese. The public in China has always respected the government. Shanhaiguan warlords scuffle, but the northeast is much more peaceful. This will inevitably give the public the illusion of goodwill. At the same time that the Japanese were educating the East Asian lifestyle in the Northeast (at that time, all students had to learn Japanese, which was advocated by the puppet Manchukuo government), a large number of immigrants were engaged in reclamation and construction, and the rudiments of industry, railways and mining in the Northeast were mostly built by the Japanese. The large-scale cultivation of rice in Northeast China was also taught by Japanese and Koreans. At that time, Japanese immigrants were also civilians in Northeast China and did not show their special status. All this shows that the Japanese at that time regarded the northeast as their Hokkaido, and they held high positions in the puppet Manchukuo government, which was the direct line and continuation of the previous dynasty, and they also received Japanese support politically and economically. In such a state, how can the people in Northeast China distinguish right from wrong?

Looking back at history, we can clearly see the true face of the invaders. And how can those at the bottom realize this? Inevitably, what they pass on to us is their limited perceptual knowledge, while our government's history class is cartoon-like and faceless. If there is no rational, culturally profound and logical research and enlightenment on that period of history, our understanding will inevitably be blurred. This is the dereliction of duty of historians. It is also a history lesson that we must make up.