Are Mufasa and Simba in the Lion King really better than Scar?

Judging from scar's appearance, his mane is sparse, a little bald and his hairline is quite high. Male lions look like this: either androgen secretion is insufficient or androgen secretion is excessive. Obviously, when it comes to scar, it is the latter. Lions with excessive androgen secretion are very violent and very cruel. Generally speaking, they are very useful in the war, but in "peacetime", they will not be too good for their wives and children.

There are several famous "lion killing" in history, with sparse manes and excessive androgen secretion. Therefore, to a certain extent, in the world of lions, it is a bit "abnormal" to grow into such a lion. A leader, a king, is a little abnormal, or completely abnormal. Whether he can rule well or not, you have the answer in your heart.

Among the real lion kings, I can think of one who really looks like this, that is Satan, the sixth member of the "Bad Kids League" in Sabisha Nature Reserve in Africa, who is also known as "Mr. T".

This guy is a cold-blooded killer, and later he became king by killing his brother's children. Is it similar to scar's experience? This kind of lion king is usually a tyrant. As for how he used to mix with other lions, how he later killed his brother's children and became king, and how he died later, an article made it very clear.

In animation, Scar usurped the throne is obviously bloody. He actually found a hyena as his usurper. Although he gained temporary kingship, he also brought the wolf into the room. Obviously, this is a mindless politician. Under its leadership, the decline of the lion is an open matter.