Why would anyone object to handing Crimea over to Russia?

From the map, the Crimean peninsula is located in the south of Ukraine, and it runs straight into the Black Sea like a diamond-shaped awl, so its strategic position is extremely important. So Sevastopol, the famous Black Sea Fleet of Russia and even the former Soviet Union, was stationed in the southwest corner of Crimea.

When the Soviet Union disintegrated, Russia and Ukraine fought for the ownership of the Black Sea Fleet. Although an agreement was finally reached, the problem about Sevastopol has not been well solved. Russia wants to rent this place for a long time as the base of the Black Sea Fleet, but Ukraine is unwilling. According to the lease agreement signed by Russia and Ukraine in 1997, the Russian Black Sea Fleet must leave before May 20 17.

Back to the history of Crimea. Due to its special strategic position, Crimea has always been a battleground for military strategists in history. From Goths, Huns to Gaoshan people, from Byzantine Empire, Golden Horde to Ottoman Empire, the owners of Crimea changed one crop after another. /kloc-In the late 8th century, the increasingly powerful czarist Russia forced the Ottoman Empire to recognize the independence of Crimea. 1783, Russia formally incorporated the entire Crimean peninsula into the territory.

From 1853 to 1856, the famous Crimean War broke out (called Crimean War in our childhood textbooks). The war between Russia and the European world, which was triggered by the struggle for control of the Balkans, was the largest international war before the First World War. The cause of the war has a complex religious background, but in the name of religion, it is essentially to expand the demand for territory. At first, Russia was at war with Turkey.

But Tsar Nicholas I's eastward expansion plan made the whole European continent feel the crisis, so Austria and Prussia also participated. But what ultimately led to Nicholas I's failure was the intervention of powerful Britain and France. The Russian-Turkish war evolved into a war between Russia and European countries, which Nicholas I did not expect. From the Danube to Crimea, the Tsar's army was losing ground, and finally signed the alliance at the gates.

The Crimean War is the first modern war in world history, which is of great significance in military history. Scientific and technological inventions such as new rifles, steam-powered warships, railways and radio communication played an important role in the war. For the first time in the history of human war, the commander of the British-French Coalition forces used radio to direct front-line operations from thousands of miles away. The military logistics system has developed into an independent department, and its engineering support, battlefield medical care and logistics transportation capabilities have been greatly improved. In modern wars or campaigns, it is the first time that the time is uniformly set by officers and men, which was adopted when the French army attacked the fortress of Marakov.

The failure of the war directly led to the later serfdom reform in Russia. Americans who had nothing to do with it on the other side of the ocean got an unexpected benefit. Fearing that Alaska, which is next to the British colony of Canada, will be occupied by the British, it is better to sell it for money than to lose it in vain, and at the same time let the United States restrict the British consideration. Russia is very eager to sell Alaska to the United States.

There is a Canada between Alaska and the United States. The United States had no intention of getting its hands on Alaska, but now it has come to the door-to-door business, not for nothing. 1In June, 867, Alaska officially became the territory of the United States. The price paid by the United States is only $7.4 million. This is really the cheapest territorial transaction in history.

Then return to Crimea. Crimea became a member of the Russian Federation after it was incorporated into the Russian territory. In the late World War II, Stalin exiled a large number of residents to Central Asia on the grounds that Crimean Tatars cooperated with Germany, and most of them died tragically in a foreign land. 1945 In February, in order to redistribute the post-war world pattern and urge the Soviet Union to fight against Japan, the heads of state of the United States, the Soviet Union and Britain held a secret meeting in Yalta, a seaside resort in Crimea, and signed the famous Yalta Agreement. The United States and Britain have done a lot of damage to China's rights and interests behind China's back in exchange for the Soviet Union's commitment to declare war on China.

After the war 1954, in order to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the "alliance" between Russia and Ukrainian Cossack Vitaliy Hmelnitski, Khrushchev, with a stroke of a pen, included Crimea, which originally belonged to Russia, into Ukraine. This is why Crimea now belongs to Ukrainian territory.

Although it belongs to Ukraine, because it belongs to Russian territory for a long time, the Russian complex of the Crimean people is as deep-rooted as Russia's Crimean complex. After being assigned to Ukraine, although the official language is Ukrainian, the daily language of the Crimean people is still Russian.

199 1 year, taking advantage of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, Cao almost became independent in Crimea in the Han Dynasty, and finally remained in the territory of Ukraine as an autonomous Republic in the negotiations between Ukraine and Russia.

Due to the inextricable ties with Russia in history and the existence of the Black Sea Fleet, Crimea may become a powder keg between Russia and Ukraine at any time. Ukraine is located in the buffer zone between Russia and continental Europe. Ukraine is more inclined to Russia, and Crimea is basically safe; Ukraine is slightly biased towards NATO, and Crimea may become the fuse.

Changes in the political situation will undoubtedly affect Ukraine's future diplomatic trend. Whether it is to recover Crimea from the chaos, or to solve the problem of the Black Sea Fleet once and for all, or to use Crimea as an excuse to send troops to influence the political situation in Ukraine. This is also one reason why Russia decisively won Crimea after Ukraine fell to the west.

As for why some people will oppose Russia's takeover of Crimea, some people refer to the United States and western countries! The attitude of the United States and the West towards Russia is that anyone who opposes Russia will oppose it and list a lot of reasons. That's for others!

The most crucial point is that Russia's threat is too great, and the nuclear weapons in Russia's hands make them feel a serious threat. So after the end of the Cold War, the Soviet Union disintegrated and Russia inherited the Soviet weapon system. Russia has been seeking to integrate into the west, but the attitude of the west towards Russia is to dismember Russia and then pull out its fangs.

Until Putin came to power, Putin still had the idea of integrating into the West, but the reality was that he couldn't do it and had to turn his arrogant head to the East.

Most people, especially Americans, completely ignore the fact that Kashmir was handed over to Ukraine in 1954, but it belonged to Russia several centuries before that. They don't even know much about Sevastopol (a port city on the southwest coast of Crimea in the Soviet Union)./Kloc-0 was founded by Russians in 783 and has always been a big city in Russia.

Even if they know this, some of them don't care, because they still hold the cold war mentality, and what Russia says and does is wrong in their eyes. 199 1 When the Soviet Union disintegrated, seven million people, including Russians and Russian speakers who recognized the country, took the wrong side on the border issue, and their attitude was "Oh, fuck them".

It is the policy of the United Nations that any existing borders are sacred and can never be changed. This is why they resolutely defend territorial integrity. The Soviet Union ceased to exist at 1922, and it lost Kashmir at 1878. However, thanks to the United Nations, Bosnia and Herzegovina still lives here after it broke away from the Ottoman Empire 139. But never mind, even if they live there, none of them are particularly concerned about territorial ownership. The attitude of the United Nations is: "You decide for yourself, and the lines on the map are sacred".

In the past 20 years, the United States and its European Union allies have been pursuing an irrational policy of encircling Russia. One of the key points of this policy is Ukraine's final integration into the European Union, which will force Russia to establish a naval base in Sevastopol, while guarding against hostile countries behind it. At the beginning of 20 14, the legitimately elected Ukrainian government was overthrown, which directly led to Russia's annexation of Crimea.

That's it. Maybe I will be regarded as a "Putin fan" or something, but Crimea belongs to Russia, and Ukraine should return Crimea to Russia when it becomes independent.

"Oppose" is because of the conflict of strategic interests, and other high-sounding slogans are wolves in sheep's clothing.

After the disintegration of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the Russians spent more than ten years trying to integrate into the western world, but Conan died in a dream. One is still ambitious, and the other is just an obedient baby. If you don't agree, you will naturally break up.

The American intention is obvious. This is purely an open plan. Since the Russians don't want to be younger brothers, they will "squeeze" you and minimize your strategic space. So NATO has been expanding eastward and trying to expand to the doorstep of the Russian people.

The attitude of the Russians is also very clear. I am a big country. Don't run around in front of my house. The warring nations didn't even bother to protest, and expressed their plot to eat Crimea in the most direct and tough way.

This has nothing to do with justice, nothing to do with the law, but the rules of big countries.

In the jungle of international politics, one of the privileges of big countries is the "right" to reserve enough strategic buffer space for themselves. The Cuban missile crisis in those years and the Sadr crisis today were all caused by opponents' violation of the rules of the game and taboos of big countries.

The Crimean crisis has led to today's situation, which should be attributed to the misjudgment of the United States, which believes that Russia has become a paper tiger and bullying it is a piece of cake. As we all know, the thin camel is bigger than the horse, and the nature of the fighting nation is still there. When the Russians bite back, it's the American's turn to be dumbfounded.

If you are stunned, you will object and then sanction.

Then, nothing, and then.

The consequences of strategic misjudgment are very serious. The butterfly effect fermented by the Crimean incident has changed the geopolitical pattern of the whole Far East and even the whole Western Pacific, which is another topic.

This question is somewhat naive and unprofessional: a country, like a person, has a moral bottom line, and if it loses the bottom line, it will inevitably cause criticism from most people in the world. Although Crimea belonged to Russia before 1954, it was later given to Ukraine, just like the separation of brothers. You gave it to Ukraine, and now you go back on your word and get it back. This is immoral, not to mention the family rules and national laws. There is also international law to solve this problem. When Russia disintegrated, it promised to abide by the sovereignty of independent countries and recognize territorial integrity. Now it realizes the strategic position of Crimea and takes it back. It would be strange if there was no international opposition to the robbery. What is even more ridiculous is that someone raised such a strange question.

It is also reasonable for Putin to use Ukraine to completely fall to the west, and Ukraine has not managed the public opinion base in Crimea. After all, Crimea is too important for Russia, and its geographical location is self-evident, but no matter how the West opposes it, it can't stop the region from returning to Russia. Ukraine is a country that has suffered disaster and collapse due to mistakes in its diplomatic line. Turning to Russia or the West is the most wrong political choice. For example, on the Crimea issue, Ukraine is afraid of maintaining a neutral role from beginning to end, and Russia will not take it back immediately. At the beginning, Ukraine was afraid to think more about the serious consequences caused by its involvement in the US-Russia dispute, and it would not have come this far ...

Said a lot, in fact, what international law, territorial ownership, Ukraine and Russia's feelings and so on are all nonsense. The reason for opposition is simple, because Russia's Black Sea Fleet is located in Crimea, which is determined by geopolitics. In fact, no matter what Russia does or does not do, the attitude of the United States to suppress Russia will not change.

Moreover, although it seems that Russia has recovered Crimea, it seems that Russia has won this round of wrestling. In fact, politically, the United States has the upper hand. The issue of Ukraine's accession to the EU itself was provoked by the United States, which was in an offensive state and Russia was in a defensive state, not to mention the economic sanctions imposed on Ukraine by the United States. Russia should be regarded as a half loser on the Ukrainian issue.

Khrushchev gave Crimea to Ukraine, and it was not much better than Ukraine. Now this place in Crimea is also very poor, and the tourism income is extremely poor. It can be said that Ukraine and Russia subsidize 500 million dollars every year, but they have a military port. In order not to pay the rental fee to Ukraine, it was recovered by a fake referendum. This jungle law of the jungle is shameless and fully exposes the expanding face of polar bears. If you give Russia a reason, you can only say that it is more shameless and has no sense of justice at all! Let the international community can't trust and look down!

Crimea has always been a battleground for the military. Whoever has a hard fist can occupy Crimea. Crimea was occupied by Ottoman Empire of Turkey, Crimea was occupied by Russia, and Crimea was also occupied by Hitler's Germany.

The history of the Crimean struggle shows that whoever has a hard fist is the master of Crimea. Crimea has never been Ukraine, and Ukraine only has jurisdiction over Crimea. When Ukraine is Russia's little brother, Russia is still at ease about Ukraine's jurisdiction over Crimea.

Now Ukraine is going to the west, and Ukraine will become the sphere of influence of Russia's strategic competitor, the United States. If Russia does not recover Crimea quickly, Crimea will become another military base of the United States.

At present, the only one who opposes Russia's annexation of Crimea is the United States, and only the United States has the qualification and ability to question Russia's occupation of Crimea, and only the United States has the ability to compete with Russia for Crimea.

Now Russia and Ukraine are not fighting for Crimea, and European countries are not opposed to Russia's occupation of Crimea. European countries have long since withdrawn from the Crimean dispute. European countries are vassals of American forces, and European countries are the mouthpiece of the United States.

Now Crimea is a game and struggle between Russia and the United States. Crimea is the epitome of the big country game. Crimea is not a dispute of sovereignty at all, but a dispute of fists, a dispute between Russia and the United States.

Ukraine vowed to retake Crimea, but only let the United States be a gun. Imagine! Ukraine really recovered Crimea, and Ukraine only nominally owned the sovereignty of Crimea. Ukraine had to hand over Crimea to the United States. If Russia does not occupy Crimea, Crimea will become an important strategic frontier for the United States to contain Russia.

Crimea has always belonged to Russia in history. 1954 during the Soviet period, Khrushchev, the then Soviet leader (he was Ukrainian himself), assigned Crimea to Ukraine on the grounds of so-called brotherhood, in fact, in order to appease Ukraine's dissatisfaction with Russia. Soviet-era leaders often do some bad things to leave a tail for future generations. For example, the Chechen issue in Russia is also a troublesome thing left by Stalin's forced relocation of Chechens.

Two villains, with evil hands against evil hands, seek a balance of power.

NATO's eastward expansion, Ukraine's color revolution, striker pointed his sword at the Russian border, violating his promise. It is evil to show one's fangs and betray one's faith.

Russian little green bear invaded Crimea and manipulated Russians to enter Russia independently. The robber's old trick of annexation is to bully the weak and fear the hard and evil hands.

Sam shouted at the top of his lungs that Russia would be sanctioned and Europe would lose 800 yuan. Russia inherits fertile soil and exports thousands of miles of grain, and oil can last for eight generations. Time is not on the side of the United States and Europe, but an evil hand.

Russian bears are still fighting, sending troops to Syria, crossing swords in Shiite countries and building an arc of crescent belt. It is an evil hand to provoke a higher intensity sectarian conflict and return to the Cold War.

The evil hand plays a zero-sum game with the evil hand, and both sides seek balance in the process.