An example of Gong Yu moving mountains or a touching debate.

There is no best answer to this question. Since this is a debate, it's better to continue with your favorite point of view. People have different ideas. My views on the above issues are:

1. Actually, moving is better than moving mountains. If you move out, Gong Yu's descendants won't have to waste so much energy doing things they don't want to do.

2. In a sense, after moving mountains to educate people, people will win if they persist.

Move articles:

Seeing a mountain is just a mountain. When you argue and define it, bite it to death as an invincible entity, a physical object. Since mountains can only be moved by endless descendants, it is too inconsistent with the efficiency of modernization and ignores the cost. If we don't talk about working methods, how can we develop the economy and build the society better and faster?

The second debate is responsible for finding some materials from some ancient examples: for example, there is still "walking is the best policy" in the thirty-six plans; Kuafu and Jingwei, who are the same material as Gong Yu, are myths, but our actual modernization can't expect a pie to fall from the sky, and we should do what we can on the basis of objective facts; ..... In any case, the two arguments must be established in theory.

Let's find a few examples of three arguments today: the Cultural Revolution, the early days of reform and opening up, mainly using counterexamples (who said that people can be productive if they are bold, and we should combine subjective initiative with the current environment). Today, we should use something positive, such as the Three Gorges immigrants.

Moving mountains:

The argument is so important that we have to turn the "mountain" into a spiritual thing. Not entity but difficulty, dilemma. The comrades below are easy to mess with.

The two debates and the three debates mainly quoted how the ancient and modern Chinese nation did not fear difficulties and overcame them. It must be from the valley to the present, and say something foreign if necessary. Stupid spirit is like universal value.

The four debates are just sensational, which has more room than the four debates that touched the party.

Ps: There are segmented arguments on the Internet, and videos can also be found. Too fragmented, I can't ctrl+c; Ctrl+v。