How to debate the benefits of reading?

I told you all the answers, and our class also held this debate. Personally, I don't think it is beneficial to open books. Square xxx: Because reading will sublimate people's minds, purify their souls and improve their own quality. The more books you read, the stronger your ability to distinguish, and the stronger your resistance to toxins, so you still need to read a lot. If you blindly prevent toxins and are afraid of "opening the book", then your ability to identify and resist will decline day by day. The temptations in today's society can be said to be ubiquitous, and the potential dangers are hard to detect. Counterparty xxx: Books are the ladder of human progress, and books are the source of human wisdom. Yes, I really don't object, but the books that students have now are more and more divided into many categories, and everyone has his own interests, as I don't care what kind of books you read. However, if you look at those meaningless books, what are their benefits and functions? If you look at those unhealthy books, your pure mind will become dirty. Everything I have just stated is our point of view, "Opening books may not be beneficial." Positive xxx: Gorky once said: "The more I read, the brighter and more meaningful books are for me to live close to the world." Take Gorky as an example. At first, he was just a shop assistant. If he doesn't study and seek knowledge, he won't have profound knowledge and superb writing level. How can he feel that "life has become brighter and more meaningful to me"? This is the result of reading widely, which adds a great writer-Gorky to the upper reaches of literary history. Reading widely can not only promote one's success, but also enhance one's sensitivity and overall planning ability. In the eventful years, Mao Zedong can decisively give the correct orders again and again and lead the people to victory. Why? Because he reads widely. At diplomatic meetings, Zhou Enlai can skillfully counter the arrogant provocation of foreign journalists again and again. Why is he so witty? Because he reads widely. It is precisely because they are well-read, Mao Zedong will strategize and use his troops like a god! Of course, we should read good books, books that are beneficial to our physical and mental health, and we can't read those books that are filthy and crooked. Belinsky once said, "Good books are the most precious treasures." And reading good books means having the key to wisdom and the greatest wealth in the world, which can be used for life. Xxx: Reading may not be beneficial, because some books are really not suitable for our children to read, not because the books are not well published, but because the contents of some books will affect our physical and mental health, and our thoughts will follow, which will affect our study. Some people are often addicted to books. The more books he reads, the less opportunities he has to communicate with others, and he will become lonely. If this continues, it will cause a series of diseases. Reading books for a long time will make your eyes nearsighted. I believe some students don't want to study with their eyes every day, so I don't think opening books may be beneficial. Square xxx: The idiom "opening an book is beneficial" originally comes from Wang Bizhi's "A Brief Record of Lushui Swallows", which means that reading is beneficial. After a hundred years, it is still in use, which shows that it has certain value and significance. I am very much in favor of "opening books is beneficial" Maybe some people say that we should have a choice and "open the book" purposefully. I don't agree with this statement. Today's society is full of competition and challenges. I'm afraid it's not enough to rely on the so-called useful good books. Dare to try, be willing to accept books from different aspects, and learn rich nutrition from books, so as to improve themselves more comprehensively and withstand various challenges. If you limit the types of books, the purpose of reading, etc. before reading, although it is useful to read, I am afraid that no matter how many, it will still be malnourished. Anti-xxx: Reading a good book is like calling a good friend, and reading a bad book is like making a bad friend. You live with a lame, you will learn a limp. Once you make a bad friend, you will be unable to extricate yourself, fall into the abyss and never turn over. Zheng Fang Zhao Meng: Books are the ladder of human progress. Only when we keep reading can we understand knowledge. Those college students can only find a good job if they keep reading. Only when you keep reading can you know everything in the world. As the saying goes, "learning is like sailing against the current. If you don't advance, you will retreat." Only when we keep reading books from all sides can we gain knowledge from all sides and benefit you a lot. Counterparty xxx: I just said in the affirmative that reading is beneficial, but I don't agree. If you read bad books, is it beneficial? We read good books because we want to learn something from them. And what can we learn from reading bad books? It's unhealthy things. Now there are many vendors who sell books whose names are written like teenagers can read, but the contents are very unfavorable to our growth. Should we read such books? At present, we have no self-control ability and can't control ourselves. For example, people who are fascinated by Internet cafes spend all day and all night in Internet cafes, which is not only harmful to their health, but also leads to a decline in their studies. Besides, people who are fascinated by reading are the same as those who are fascinated by Internet cafes. Originally, we wanted to learn something useful from the internet and books to broaden our horizons and absorb some knowledge extensively. But some people are fascinated by reading bad books, not only can't learn anything, but also waste their youth. What good is this? Some high school students are like this, indulging in some useless books all day. As a result, I delayed my study, my grades dropped all the way, and finally I didn't get into a key university, wasting my life. Isn't this caused by locust trees? Counterparty xxx: Of course, reading can make people increase their knowledge and cultivate their sentiments, but opening books is only under beneficial conditions, not just any book. Liu Xiang once said in the Han Dynasty: "Books are still medicine, and good blasphemy can cure fools." Since a book is a medicine, it has two functions: first, it is a good medicine, and the medicine can cure the disease; First, poison can kill people. Isn't it not necessarily beneficial to open books? ------------debate words: People often say: "It is beneficial to open books and read books." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely correct. If we are interested in every book, it may not be beneficial to open it. Nowadays, students may all like to read novels, books and periodicals about martial arts and romance, and sometimes they forget all about eating and sleeping. Once they get lost in reading books, they will be possessed. Then they are preoccupied with books in class and have no mind to study, and their grades will plummet. Others are attracted by some plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes go to the road of crime. Isn't this killing yourself by reading? This is only the first layer contained in "opening books is not necessarily beneficial": opening books is not necessarily beneficial. And the second floor. The second is that we should have a choice when reading books. Don't read books that are unhealthy and of little help to us. To read books, we should read some books that are beneficial to our physical and mental health and helpful to our study and life. Such a book is a good book. Only by reading it well will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends. If you value books, you will make good friends and make progress. If you don't read good books, of course, make friends with people who don't make good friends, and then you will regress. Because near Zhu Zhechi, near Mexico is black! Therefore, only reading books will be beneficial to you. Therefore, my opinion is that opening books may not be beneficial. I sincerely hope that every student can read books selectively. Don't lead yourself astray and ruin your life because you read a wrong book. Opening books is not necessarily beneficial. It is true that reading can make people increase their knowledge, cultivate their temperament and cultivate their body and mind, but "opening books" is only a necessary condition, not a sufficient condition. Liu Xiang once said in the Han Dynasty: "Books are still medicine, and good reading can cure fools." Since a book is a medicine, it has two functions: first, it is a good medicine, and the medicine will get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 192s, many people were regarded as Hitler's martyrs because of their bad influence on Mein Kampf. Bad books, like bad friends, may kill you. It's true. Now some students are addicted to martial arts or romance novels, reading those grotesque books all day, and "throwing" their homework aside, which leads to the decline of their academic performance, and finally they make a bamboo basket and draw water with a sieve. Just think, can a book like "Open" be said to be "beneficial"? "A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber." Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what volume to open first. A philosopher once said that people who can get the necessary nutrition are healthier than those who eat a lot. At the same time, real scholars are often not people who read books, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously about reading books, but just skim through them. Some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some even read books with an attitude of curiosity. How can such an "open book" be useful? As an emphasis on the importance of reading, the idiom "opening books is beneficial" naturally has its positive significance, but it is inappropriate to judge that "opening books is beneficial".