The topic of love, a line of composition of 600 words.

Hee hee, the landlord's debate is actually the same as when I was studying in the school debate. What a coincidence! (However, I was debating. We won. Oh, yes, yes. . . Please be patient. I will provide you with the materials from the first debate to the third debate. I think the reference time is too long! The following is a summary of four arguments for the landlord: Summary Statement Thank you, Chairman: We believe that it is better to encourage everyone to "love and do things" to love what they do well and do what they love. Love can only be done well, and love can be done deeply. If people spend their energy and time on making up their shortcomings, they have no time to take care of strengthening and exerting their advantages. Moreover, anyone's shortcomings are much more than talents, and most of them are irreparable. This is not only imperfect, but also loses the chance of winning a single project. Society is progressive. With the improvement of people's overall income and the trend of social progress, people's needs are required to deepen vertically and horizontally in the direction of diversification and stratification, and constantly move forward from material requirements to spiritual requirements. Therefore, people's labor is no longer just for eating, dressing and housing ... it needs spiritual pleasure and physical and mental satisfaction. This is the meaning of loving and doing a line, which will make people more comfortable in the workplace, help improve work efficiency, get more outstanding achievements, bring more honor to the collective and the country, realize personal real value and improve their lives. Therefore, we should advocate "love a line and do a line"! -Objection to the other side's argument: Deng Juwen Thank you, Madam President. Thank you for your wonderful explanations. Unfortunately, although the other side's statement sounds specious, it can't hide the truth at all. As we argued, interest is the best teacher of mankind. With interest, we have the enthusiasm and perseverance to do a good job and live an ideal life. The ultimate goal of "do what you do, love what you do" insisted by the opposing debater is to love the industry you are engaged in. It goes without saying that it is really doubtful whether we can achieve our goal. Under the planned economy system, how many people are engaged in organizational arrangements with the mentality of "eating from the same pot", lacking enthusiasm for their jobs and passively coping, resulting in a huge waste of national resources! Opponents always emphasize reality, reality and reality, so let's face it: the reality is that China is gradually moving towards an efficient market economy; The reality is that we live in an era of advocating individual freedom; The reality is that the social labor force is surplus and the employment situation is grim. No one has the patience to gradually cultivate your interest in a certain industry ... Only by "loving a line and doing a line" can you maximize your subjective initiative, devote yourself to your work with full enthusiasm and accelerate the development of the country. I think everyone here has heard the saying "Men are afraid to get into the wrong business, and women are afraid to marry the wrong person"? The previous sentence just warned us: don't blindly choose industries that you are not interested in and do nothing for life! China is ahead of the United States in basic education, but far behind in higher education. One of the reasons is that we have no right to choose our favorite major after entering the university, and our precious youth is wasted because we are not interested in the major! Under such a system, how to train a large number of senior professionals? Another debater is also a college student. Don't you feel similar? The other debater also said: people should adapt to the environment, not the environment to adapt to you. If humans keep doing this, I'm afraid we are still in the era of eating and drinking blood. The continuous progress of human society depends on the spirit of challenging ourselves, not obedience to the environment. Doing a line and loving a line are mostly a kind of helplessness and patience. If Mr. Lu Xun succumbs to the environment and insists on the so-called "love and dedication" spirit of the other debater to become a doctor, then who will heal the soul of our nation? Celebrities at home and abroad, such as Einstein and Beethoven, are full of love for their own industries, have devoted their efforts and lives, and have made great achievements! Our debate is about what should be advocated in today's society. Since it is "should", it is a kind of should, not a reality. There are inevitably some gaps in reality, but this should not shake our beliefs and pursuits. Does the motherland we love and the society that raised us really give us no choice, as described by another debater? Life is limited, everyone wants to achieve something, love a line and do a line, in order to happily engage in their own work and make a contribution to society. Opposing friends, turn back, face up to the needs of the times, love and do one thing, and your future will be bright! -Opposing point of view: Hello, Li Chenhui! A serious debate field needs a serious concept. The other party has mentioned reality many times and should emphasize the word "should". We emphasize "should" love a line and do a line, but the other party always limits the scope to one line when objective conditions do not allow it, and then passively "falls in love" with this line. Now that the other party has made it clear that it is necessary to make a line that they don't like first, what is the significance of our argument? Please ask another debater to look at the question again: in today's society, should we do one thing, love one thing or love one thing, and what is "should"? It is the goal pursued by our society today and is not limited by objective conditions. Today, in the process of pursuing truth, after years of experience, we come to today's civilized society to discuss this topic that has been discussed for thousands of years. Now, let me sum up our views again. First, interests and ideals are the best teachers of human beings, and enthusiasm can bring subjective initiative into play. Zhang Zai once said: If people are not far from their interests, they are absent-minded, although they have learned nothing. This shows that a person's interest plays a decisive role in the necessity of his success. If a person is not interested in what he has done or learned, how can he talk about achievement? Only when a person is very concerned and interested in one thing can it be done well. Obviously, interest is a prerequisite for one's success. Without interest, Feng Jicai, whose height is 1.93, has the innate advantages of being a basketball player. How can he become a famous writer in China? If there were no interests, how could Marx, who was penniless at that time, endure hunger and cold and complete his dream without hesitation? How did Mr. Lu Xun, who had no interest in studying medicine in Japan and achieved excellent results, use a sharp pen to save the ignorant people in China at that time? Isn't all this supported by one's interests and ideals? If, as another debater said, you just do what you don't like because of the oppression of the surrounding environment, then who will be the author of the Boxer Rebellion, a great political figure and a hero who will save the people of China? Second, today's society is a society that requires high efficiency, and loving one line and doing one line just meets this requirement. Everyone knows that it is not easy to find a job in today's fierce competition, let alone find a job that we like, but should we give up our ideals because of such environmental restrictions? As another debater mentioned, it is unrealistic to find a job you like in such fierce competition, but is it right to do a job you don't like? Now, why do so many people jump ship? Isn't it all because you can't find a job you like? Today's society is a society that requires high efficiency. If you blindly look for a job and always do a job you don't like, can you be efficient? Inefficiency will naturally be eliminated, so "forced by reality" to find another company that you don't like to do the work you don't like, and then be eliminated. Is this worthless journey of life what the other debater pursues? I believe that if everyone present was the boss, they wouldn't hire an employee who didn't like the job at all, right? Such low work efficiency is something that no one in the workplace has the energy, courage and time to bear. Third, today's society pays attention to personality development and advocates creation. Only by loving and doing a line can human beings exert their greatest creative potential. Only a society that respects individuals can survive in today's world, and it is a society with great development potential. I believe this is universally acknowledged. Why can't American college students catch up with junior high school students in China in math and physics? Why are there many times more Nobel Prize winners in the United States than in China? Why is the economic strength of the United States stronger than that of any other country in the world, while China can only rank among the "developing countries"? Isn't the source of these all because of four words? Pay attention to personality. Americans think it doesn't matter what you do, what matters is whether you like it or not. People in China think it doesn't matter what you do, what matters is whether you welcome yourself. And this view of China, of course, is the other debater's view. The efficiency brought by this view, the degree of tapping a person's potential and the creativity that people can exert in this respect are far from being compared with those of Americans. Of course, this is our view. In today's society, we don't deny that there are some cases in reality where we have fallen in love with a certain line and achieved something. Should these cases be used instead of general principles? Kill our spirit of respecting individuality and being proactive? We should be conscious and ready to do what we like, instead of passively "where I am needed, I will go". Only the spirit of loving and doing can make us and our society survive in such a competitive environment! Thank you! Three debates depend on your free play, so make good use of those three minutes. Don't be led by the nose. You should try to ask questions and let them step into your trap step by step to answer your questions, so that you have a better chance of winning. . . I hope my answer is helpful to the landlord!