How to deal with poor households who are unwilling to vacate their old houses after enjoying resettlement houses?

Generally, people who enjoy resettlement houses are poor relocated households. I think we should actively communicate and persuade them to vacate their old homes. We can communicate and convince them from the following aspects.

First, this is a requirement of laws and regulations. According to China's "Land Management Law", a rural villager can only own one homestead, and he must vacate the old homestead when he occupies the new homestead. However, the agreement signed by the relocated households to vacate the old homestead, after the relocated households move into the new house, they should demolish the original house and recover the land use right. It is the legal obligation of the relocated people to vacate the old house.

Second, this is a poverty alleviation method for poor households to get rid of poverty. I moved here to enjoy the resettlement house because my original place of residence belongs to the "one side can't keep water and soil alive" area, with harsh natural conditions, fragile ecological environment, frequent natural disasters, backward production methods and lack of infrastructure. To solve these problems and achieve the goal of poverty alleviation, we must "move the poverty nest and uproot it".

Three, vacate the homestead for reclamation and greening. On the one hand, it is the need to save intensive land. Rational utilization and protection of cultivated land resources is the basic national policy of China. After the homestead is vacated, priority will be given to reclamation as cultivated land to increase the cultivated land area and ensure food security. On the other hand, it is the need of ecological protection. Ecological protection and natural restoration should be carried out for the homestead that has not been reclaimed.

Fourth, the village history museum can be built in the new resettlement site. Reluctance to vacate the old house may be due to the memory of the relocated households and their yearning for the old house, and the establishment of the village history museum can make the relocated households feel homesick.

Moving out of the old house is the legal obligation of the relocated people. I hope the above suggestions will help you.

According to the requirement of one household and one house, poor households must vacate their old houses after enjoying resettlement houses. Before the ex situ relocation, poor households and the town government signed the Agreement on Ex situ Poverty Alleviation and Relocation of Old Homes, and reached an agreement on related matters. After enjoying the resettlement house, you can vacate the old house according to the regulations and enjoy the reward of vacating the old house. It is a violation of the agreement not to vacate the old house as required, and it is necessary to bear the liability for breach of contract as required.

Default treatment for vacating the old house: poor households must vacate the old house site and dismantle the old house and its attachments within 3 years after relocation and resettlement, and return the old house site use certificate to the county land and resources management department within 7 days after vacating. When collective economic organizations redistribute the vacated and reclaimed land, poor households have the priority to contract management rights. If poor households refuse to return the homestead use certificate, the government has the right to refuse to assist them to apply for the real estate registration certificate of newly installed houses, or even take back the resettlement houses.

Reward and compensation for the retirement of old houses: the reward and compensation for the retirement of old houses for ex situ poverty alleviation and relocation objects consists of two parts: the reward and compensation for the retirement of houses and the reward and compensation for the retirement of per capita. The reward and compensation shall be implemented in accordance with the principle of "calculating the house price and combining people with houses", and the total amount of funds issued shall not exceed 6,543,800 yuan per person. Ex situ poverty alleviation relocation object has old homestead, according to the housing structure and occupied area, in accordance with the "civil structure 80 yuan/m, brick-concrete structure 1 10 yuan/m" standard to pay housing vacate award; Decentralized resettlement, self-built, and centralized resettlement in cities and towns with old homesteads, the old house incentive subsidy fund will be issued according to per capita 1.000 yuan (including the housing vacate incentive fund); Unified planning, unified construction, and centralized resettlement have old homesteads, and the old houses with per capita 1 10,000 yuan are included in the unified accounting of housing costs, and the per capita bonus funds are calculated and distributed.

It should be a resettlement household, and the old house has long been demolished! It's not that the resettlement households won't give you a house, just subsidies for the renovation of dangerous houses!

There are four main tricks: (1) make an agreement in advance and make a written commitment; (2) Moved by reason and understood by emotion; (3) Not handling property rights for the time being, and handling property rights only after demolition; (4) Forced demolition to maintain fairness.

Since the end of last year, according to the requirements of the superior poverty alleviation special inspection team, the author has also carried out special rectification for poor households who have not vacated their old houses after enjoying resettlement houses. Some of them were demolished through work years ago, and some of them have not been demolished now. It is necessary to further intensify the work and complete the rectification task of the special inspection team for poverty alleviation at a higher level.

First, you need to make a written commitment in advance. The relocation of poverty alleviation targets in different places or D-class dangerous houses involves the implementation of the policy of "one household, one house", and all new buildings must be demolished. Therefore, in order to reduce the workload behind as much as possible, and at the same time let the people have a clear understanding on the basis of understanding the relevant policies, it is better to let the people make a written commitment to vacate the old house first when determining the relocation target for the declared project, which can reduce the resistance and workload for the subsequent vacating work. This is also one of the working measures to prevent the masses from occupying both the new and the old.

Second, mobilizing and persuading, not doing property rights for the time being, the combination of the two can also promote some old houses to vacate. This is the problem of sharpening the mouths of township and village cadres. Being rational and rational is the most basic working method. In addition, when mobilizing persuasion, we must clearly explain the unfavorable factors of not handling property rights. In particular, in some places, there are corresponding tax and fee reductions for poor households to handle property rights, and they should also take advantage of them to understand that "if you miss this village, there will be no good shop" and strive for the property right certificate of the new house after the demolition in time.

Third, forced demolition will create a shock and safeguard fairness. This is because the reason has been exhausted, and all parties have used it. There is no special reason. If they still refuse to vacate, they can only take this measure. When taking this measure, it is best to choose one household to implement it first, so as to form a deterrent and drive other households to take the initiative to vacate. In the past two or three years, poverty alleviation for poor households has been relatively in place. If they are allowed to eat more and occupy more in the homestead policy, others will have greater opinions, which is one of the reasons why this measure has to be taken.

On the issue of relocation, because I work at the grassroots level, my main job last year was relocation. Here, I will share my views with my own work practice:

Relocate villagers in poor areas to newly-built houses.

Ex situ poverty alleviation and relocation is a major measure to help poor households who have established a file to get rid of poverty accurately. It is to move them out of areas with harsh natural conditions, fragile ecological environment, frequent natural disasters, backward production methods and lack of infrastructure, and "move the poor nest and uproot it" to change the status quo of "one side can't support one person". There are also many relocation subsidies in various places. For example, our local area has reached more than 30,000 yuan/person. For poor households with a large population, building a new house in a place with good living conditions can be said to cost nothing.

If you enjoy the benefits, you need to bear the corresponding responsibilities-it is an obligation to demolish the old and fill the sea.

The poor households who choose to enjoy the ex situ poverty alleviation and relocation subsidy policy shall sign the demolition and reclamation agreement with the relocated households at the beginning by the local township government or village committee. The agreement clearly stipulates the time limit for farmers to remove and recover their old houses, and also stipulates the subsidies they can get for completing the removal according to the time limit. The total subsidy is generally around 1 10,000 yuan. Therefore, reclamation and relocation are complementary and interrelated, and there is no "pie falling from the sky" in this world.

What if the old house is not demolished? -forced demolition!

If you enjoy the ex situ poverty alleviation and relocation policy and are unwilling to demolish the houses on the old homestead, it will form a de facto "one household with multiple houses", which is contrary to the current homestead policy of "one household with one house" in China. Article 62 of the Land Management Law stipulates that "rural residents' homesteads must have one household, one house and multiple houses, which are illegal land use except for legal reasons". Obviously, the old house base is not demolished for legal reasons, and the land is illegal. If you don't tear it down yourself, it must be forcibly removed.

What do you think of this problem?

I am walking in urban and rural areas, and I am glad to receive an invitation to answer this question. Because my hometown has been in the countryside and now I do business with the countryside, I know this situation better! Now I express my opinion on what I have seen!

I am a rural area in southern Shaanxi, and there are many kinds of relocation here. I will say two common things: first, ecological relocation is a kind of relocation to protect the ecology! Second, poor households move!

Ecological relocation is the application of farmers and the village group agrees. Subsidies will be given to the purchase of commercial housing at designated locations. Generally ranging from 40,000 to 50,000, this kind of relocation seems to be a kind of relocation that developers are willing to like. Developers take this opportunity to sell houses, and farmers who want to improve their home environment will also benefit! However, I feel that there is a tendency to become stale. Why do you say that, the developer's house price has also risen accordingly! This kind of relocation is basically to build resettlement sites in the urban-rural fringe! Most of the people who are resettled are skilled workers, businessmen or migrant workers. Survival, life and employment are not problems!

Another kind of relocation of poor households, I have two kinds here, one is that farmers in the village pay10.5 million yuan and enjoy a set of basic housing of 50 square meters! One is to buy at the designated resettlement site, with a subsidy of 25,000 per person. Such people are still cost-effective! You can basically get a house for free! The relocation of poor households requires the demolition of the original residential houses!

What I saw was that after the poor households demolished their houses. Not far from home, they will go back to their original place of residence to grow crops every day, and some will set up sheds to raise chickens and pigs in their original place of residence. I feel that their life is not as convenient as before. Go back to the farm for more than an hour in the morning and sleep at the resettlement site for more than an hour in the afternoon. I said they were poorer!

I think the relocation policy for poor households is good. Improve the living environment. However, it is appropriate to move in situ. Just don't leave the group, just build a settlement in the group where you live. Decentralized placement. This can not only change the environment, but also not delay farming!

In precision poverty alleviation, in order to fundamentally solve the poverty problem caused by poor households' poor living environment, they are relocated to help the poor on the basis of their voluntary choice of relocation. Relocation of ex situ poverty alleviation can not only improve the poor living environment, but also improve the living conditions, which is an important poverty alleviation measure.

According to the precise poverty alleviation policy, when poor households choose to relocate to help the poor, their old houses will be demolished after moving into the new houses uniformly built in the resettlement sites, and the homestead after the houses are demolished will be used for reclamation.

Taking 20 16-20 17 * * as an example, two batches of ex situ poverty alleviation relocation were carried out. After these poor households moved into the new houses built in the resettlement sites, the towns and villages also allocated a sum of money to the village committees as the cost of demolishing the old houses. Most of the old houses were demolished, but in the process of demolition, some individuals were unable or unwilling to dismantle because of special circumstances.

For example, a poor household chose to relocate to help the poor and moved into a new house at the resettlement site. The village Committee reflected that his old house could not be demolished. It is found that the old house of this poor household was built with his brother, who is not a poor household and does not enjoy poverty alleviation and relocation. If the old house of a poor household is demolished, it will definitely cause damage to his brother's house.

The final solution is for the village committee to write an explanation to the poverty alleviation department, why the old house can't be demolished. After obtaining the consent of the poverty alleviation department, the old house was retained without demolition.

Therefore, when encountering such problems, we must first find out the reason why the old house can't be demolished, because it can't be demolished under special circumstances or because poor households have ideological burdens and don't want to demolish it.

Due to special circumstances can not be removed, to write a good description of the situation to the poverty alleviation department, after approval can be retained without removal; If poor households do not want to be demolished for personal reasons, they should do their ideological work well, enlighten and resolve their ideological burden, and then demolish.

Some poor households, like us, do have the ideological complex that it is difficult to leave their homeland, and some want to go back to farming or breeding, fearing that it will be inconvenient to go back after demolition. It is understandable that they have these ideas, but since they have formulated a policy of bringing in the new and tearing down the old, they must implement it.

How to enlighten and resolve them, let them get rid of ideological burdens and demolish old houses? We can start from many aspects. First, we can tell them that it is much more convenient to go out after moving to the resettlement site, and they can work, transfer land, and have double income, which is higher than that of simple planting; The second is to tell them that if they really want to go home to farm or breed in the future, they can rent a house or live with their neighbors, which is also possible.

In short, it is to think from their perspective as much as possible, solve the difficulties they face with practical actions, give them the greatest help, relieve their worries, and let go of their ideological burdens, which is conducive to new work.

To sum up, there is a policy of moving the new and tearing down the old to help the poor move. If poor households move into new houses without demolishing the old houses, they should first understand the reasons why they are unwilling to demolish the old houses. Due to special circumstances, they can keep the old houses without demolishing them after obtaining the consent of the poverty alleviation department. Due to personal reasons of poor households, they should give priority to ideological enlightenment and help them resolve their concerns before demolishing the old houses.

You can learn about the basic situation of farmers first. For the deeply poor people in areas with particularly harsh natural environment, the willingness to move is particularly strong. Take them as the key and difficult points in the relocation and resettlement work, and take the road of "easy first, difficult later, and the whole village moves". This should also be formulated according to local policies.

According to the policy, the old house should be demolished. Some poor households need both resettlement houses and original houses, and even some resettlement households have been reluctant to move in after getting new houses, and still live in old and dangerous houses. In order to prevent the housing safety of poor resettlement households from being guaranteed and living at both ends, all resettlement households should sign an old house demolition agreement and a land reclamation agreement, complete them within a time limit, and give certain subsidies; Resolutely not to demolish old houses is just to disqualify and return to resettlement houses.

The poor households in our village have got new houses in the country. However, most poor households have several sets of old houses in rural areas, and many poor households have new brick houses in rural areas. They only tore down the adobe house, but the brick house was not folded.