Sweden insists on permanent neutrality. Why should the sudden change of wind direction contribute $23 billion to Ukraine?

Sweden's commitment to donate $23 billion to Ukraine is clear. Sweden claims to be a permanent neutral country, that is, it will remain politically neutral forever. Now Ukraine is at war with Russia, and Sweden is helping Ukraine at this time. What kind of neutrality, the attitude is very clear, is to support Ukraine to fight Russia.

Why did the wind suddenly change when the Ukrainian-Russian war broke out and Sweden adhered to the principle of permanent neutrality? This is the superposition effect of a comprehensive factor, and there may be only two fundamental reasons:

1, the so-called permanent neutrality, that is, political neutrality, is just written on paper to fool the people. This is a very hypocritical cover. How can there be permanent neutrality in the world? Or is there absolute neutrality that cannot be changed? Because "neutrality" is relative, it can change with time, events and circumstances. The Ukrainian-Russian war has broken out. Due to the influence of geopolitics, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland may feel the crisis they may face from Ukraine, so it is understandable that they instinctively broke their neutrality and began to take sides.

2. It does not rule out that it is the threat or coercion of the United States or the big powers of the European Union, or pressure, which is inevitable to break neutrality. Being in the big family of the European Union, it is sometimes said that the overall situation follows a certain country. This is also called political correctness!

Think about it. As a small Nordic country with a population of only 6.5438+million, Russia is not to be taunted. Can some big countries in the United States and Europe offend them? Sandwiched between such superpowers, we can only survive in the cracks. At this time, we must step aside. At that time, the attitude of the big EU countries was their attitude. Take the donation meeting held in Warsaw on May 5th as an example, which was personally presided over by EU President Ursula von der Leyen. On the surface, it is voluntary, but in fact it is to decompose cadres. Everyone present donated some money more or less!