What are the manifestations of the global governance deficit?

Yes, global governance knows that the key points of deficit reduction are as follows: 1. The peace deficit is manifested as follows: first, geopolitical risks have increased sharply. The background of peace deficit is the game between big countries and the return of power logic. If before the outbreak of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, people were still worried about the outbreak of a new cold war in the world, or that the world was stepping into a parallel system that was isolated from each other, then after the conflict, people were more worried about the outbreak of a hot war in the world and even afraid of nuclear war. For a long time after World War II, the international community generally believed that the world had entered an era when great powers had no war. 2. The development deficit is the primary factor that causes many global problems, so development has also become the golden key to solve problems and ultimately achieve global governance. The development deficit is manifested as follows: first, the imbalance of income distribution brought about by globalization makes populism and protectionism prevail at present, and globalization goes against the current. The uneven internal development and widening income gap in some developed countries have bred the soil of anti-globalization thoughts and intensified domestic populism and protectionism. In order to shirk their responsibilities, some developed countries "dumped" the pot on other countries. 3. Deficit control is mainly manifested in two aspects. The first is to control the imbalance between supply and demand. On the one hand, global problems are constantly emerging, and countries' demand for global governance is increasing; On the other hand, countries, especially some big countries, are declining in their willingness and ability to control supply, such as immigrants and refugees. According to a report, by 2020, more than 270 million people have not lived in their own countries, and their home countries and destination countries are facing related problems such as managing migration flows. Although there is a huge international demand for the governance of immigrants and refugees, on the supply side of governance, the willingness and ability of traditional hegemonic countries to participate in governance are declining. In addition, in recent years, in response to the epidemic, some hegemonic countries have consumed huge resources and even overdrawn resources, making it difficult to take care of external governance needs.