What are the pros and cons of exploration? (The debate draft is the best)

Benefits: Haier brothers gave you reverie, Robinson gave you faith; Xu Xiake lets you know how to be realistic, and Amundsen makes you awe. Yu Chunshun made you cry, and Columbus cheered you up ... The legendary stories of these adventure heroes have deeply touched your heart! You don't have to go far to write a composition on the topic of "adventure" Find the relevant information of the people you like, read it carefully, re-baptize your mind with their optimism, courage and challenge, and reflect on the impetuousness and cowardice in your life. You can combine heroic stories with your life experiences and feelings in a narrative and discussion way, which is a feeling after reading. However, if you want to write a good review, it is very important to avoid empty arguments, which requires you to grasp the "feeling point"-the place where you feel the deepest. Often the deepest feeling is not the vague quality spirit, but some details-action, psychology, eyes, smile, or a small event. For example, "Captain Scott's diary recorded his last breath until his fingers were completely frozen and the pen slipped from his stiff hand." Write down their willingness to devote themselves to science; Scott testified for the dead Norwegians who arrived at the South Pole first, headed by Amundsen, and wrote their spirit of being honest and calmly facing failure. Oates, afraid of dragging his companions, asked Wilson for ten morphine tablets to end himself when necessary. Liu Lianman climbed the "ladder" for his partners, left the last oxygen for his comrades, fell asleep and wrote down their collectivism and lofty dedication. Yang Liwei vomited in a coma during training and wrote about their perseverance and sense of responsibility for winning glory for the country; Robinson arranged good and bad, good and bad in the form of loans, and wrote their consciousness and skills of overcoming loneliness, being full of enthusiasm for work and life, and learning to survive. Yu Chunshun didn't lament his own sufferings, but dug a pit, faced his hometown death calmly, and understood the connotation of life ... What could move you more than this? When you are reading, you might as well draw these touching details and write them down, and you will find yourself integrated into the explorer's life world. However, you may be moved by the spirit of these explorers and think more calmly? You are thinking: human beings have indeed experienced countless explorations from the time when they ate flesh and blood to today's civilization and prosperity, but is it necessary for us to explore today? Are jumping and drifting like Ke Shouliang and Yong Maoshu meaningless adventures? Is some money wasted and life wasted? In the face of the era of the Big Bang, did the places explored leave human footprints, but they also left dust and garbage from land, sea and space, endangering human beings? Yes, exploration is also a double-edged sword. You can start from the opposite side, draw inferences from others, draw inferences from others, and express your views on one or more aspects. You can also hide the picture scroll and express your surging feelings with poetic brushstrokes. But writing poetry is easy to become lyrical like crying, and you can use something with distinctive regional characteristics as your emotional image. For example: white sand, birds, Loulan beauty and Millennium roots in Lop Nur; The sparkling stars on the top of Mount Everest, the vast darkness and abyss below; Thick snow and hard-to-find footprints in Antarctica; Flowers on Robinson's desert island-fragrant ink, pickaxe, wood needle grass thread; Blue planet and white clouds in Yang Liwei's eyes; Oates' frozen toes, Scott and Wilson hugging each other in their sleeping bags ... Only by mixing your feelings and concretizing abstract spiritual praise can people feel real and impress themselves and others. It is really difficult to write an adventure composition, but there are many risks. You might as well take a spiritual adventure, which may be a good opportunity for you to show your talents!

Disadvantages: danger! It's easy to meet all kinds of fierce animals! There will be poisonous insects and sometimes they will be bitten by leeches! You may be short of water in the desert, so you died! Sometimes I fall into the deep valley! Some people are even overturned by the wind and waves when exploring at sea, so that you can exercise your strong body when you are buried at the bottom of the sea, which leads to the opposite sex being too favored and you have no choice; Will develop fearless courage and superhuman wit and cause others to be jealous; It is easy to find that wild animals are too excited to sleep, which affects their rest; It is also possible to find the treasure of the ancient tomb and get rich overnight, resulting in nothing for the rest of your life. Do you want to argue? If so, you can give some advice. First of all, you should define exploration as an act, and its purpose can be varied, such as colonization, immigration, aggression and so on. The most developed period of human exploration was16th century, and it was also a period of great suffering for the colonial people. The message is simple. The motives of all explorers are not very pure. The central idea is that they just have no good intentions. Some people think it is more harmful. They think exploration is a meaningless adventure. It consumes a lot of time, money and even sacrifices many precious lives. Not worth it! Accidents and dangers occur frequently-outdoor adventure is a "dangerous game"? To some extent, exploration is the product of anthropocentrism. This concept holds that in the face of nature and its biological world, human beings can set foot everywhere, and as long as they can, they can "occupy the mountain as the king" and "insert the flag of Xinjiang" and take it for themselves. However, if we go beyond the thinking frame of "anthropocentrism", we can question: Is there no limit or restriction for human steps? As long as human footprints are gone, must they belong to human beings? Should it be dominated by humans? In fact, when the footprint of human exploration arrived, it was also the day when the disaster happened there. Isn't it? Humans fly into space, and the garbage in space has surrounded the earth; Man has climbed the "top of the earth"-Mount Everest, and the source of the Yangtze River has been polluted now. When human beings enter and leave the primeval forest, the "indigenous" animals and creatures there are disturbed and violated, and even destroyed ... Just as Columbus's exploration of the "New World" brought about the expansion of colonialism, today's "exploration" of human beings without self-discipline and restrictions also reflects the expansion of anthropocentrism. Science is a double-edged sword, so is exploration. Human exploration will leave dust where it leaves footprints.