Why doesn't anyone watch Hong Kong movies now?

Hongkong film is the pioneer of China film. Chinese movies are divided into four places: Hong Kong movies, mainland movies, Singaporean movies and Taiwan Province movies. 1997 Before the reunification, Hong Kong had developed into one of the production bases of Chinese-speaking world (including overseas Chinese society) and even East Asian films. For decades, Hong Kong has been a film industry base and one of the film export destinations. People call it "Oriental Hollywood". Hongkong film is the pioneer of China film. Chinese movies are divided into four places: Hong Kong movies, mainland movies, Singaporean movies and Taiwan Province movies. 1997 Before the reunification, Hong Kong had developed into one of the production bases of Chinese-speaking world (including overseas Chinese society) and even East Asian films. For decades, Hong Kong has been a film industry base and one of the film export destinations. People call it "Oriental Hollywood".

Hong Kong films have lost many markets, including Southeast Asian markets, due to Hollywood's high-tech production and its own large-scale shoddy production. At the same time, influenced by Japanese and Korean films, a large number of film funds are lost, and filmmakers are left behind, showing an unprecedented decline. The approach of 1997 has also aggravated the expectations and anxiety of Hong Kong people. Many people emigrated overseas and a lot of money was withdrawn from the film industry. Most people are still waiting to see, hoping to turn around in anxiety and worry. Everything has two sides, and the downturn of Hong Kong films is only a moment of big waves. Many previous follow-up and shoddy works have been reduced, and the film circle has been "purified" to a certain extent. The rest of the filmmakers have begun to re-find the entry point of the market, explore new film expressions, and plan the new future of Hong Kong films. There have been many movies that were difficult to see under the original business model. For example, Chen Guo's Hong Kong Production pays attention to marginal life from the perspective of civilians, and its recording style is fresh and true. Another reason for the decline of Hong Kong movies is that the filmmakers are young and yellow. After John Woo 1993 successfully entered Hollywood, Chow Yun Fat, Jackie Chan, Jet Li, Yang Ziqiong and Yuan Heping went to Hollywood to make films, and a large number of Hong Kong film pillars moved out of their native land, resulting in an instant vacuum of film talents. At this time, some new generations of filmmakers appeared, who injected new strength into Hong Kong films under the condition of depressed market and lack of human resources. Among them, Du Qifeng is one of the key directors who stick to Hong Kong. Hong Kong gangster movies in this period are permeated with a tragic fate of chaotic eschatology.

Gangs in Hong Kong are the biggest culprit in this situation! For example, John Woo and Zhang Che study movies together. He was born in a serious class, and his films are very aesthetic and artistic. 1986, his film "The True Color of Heroes" was an "artistic creation", and there was almost no entanglement with the underworld at that time. Also won a full house. Results 1993, he was in full swing, but he went to Hollywood to develop at the hottest time. Is he going to higher ground? I still think that the film and television environment in Hong Kong has been "hijacked" by gangs, which is not good ... I believe there are both, but the proportion of the latter may be greater. Because you can change your situation, think about it: John Woo has become the "king" of the Hong Kong film industry, and as a result, I don't want to be a "servant" in the United States ... So it is obvious that there are "eunuchs" who want to make money by "praising the son of heaven"?

Results 1993, he was in full swing, but he went to Hollywood to develop at the hottest time. Is he going to higher ground? I still think that the film and television environment in Hong Kong has been "hijacked" by gangs, which is not good ... I believe there are both, but the proportion of the latter may be greater. Because you can change your situation, think about it: John Woo has become the "king" of the Hong Kong film industry, and as a result, I don't want to be a "servant" in the United States ... So it is obvious that there are "eunuchs" who want to make money by "praising the son of heaven"?

China people especially like to emphasize the importance of being a man, and like to say, "First of all, you have to be a man". As for getting things done, it's not that important. And the living standard of China people is a bit high. People's talents are always limited, and there are not many talents among those who meet the standards. Those who have reached the peak of both, most of them die young. It is hard to say whether this sighing result is due to the envy of talents or the long-term suppression of personality by geniuses. What's more, if we pursue perfection, we will inevitably offend people-choosing a more suitable new partner will hurt an old partner who is no longer suitable. Setting strict enforcement standards is hurting those who can't achieve it. This is indeed not enough nostalgia, gratitude and kindness. People who do this are called people who can't be human. I believe that Stephen Chow must have hurt many people, which is why so many people openly express their dissatisfaction with him. However, in my opinion, such objections are unfair to Stephen Chow. Genius has no obligation to accommodate mediocrity. If mediocre people can complain less and work harder, they may be closer to genius. So many people complained that Stephen Chow was given a chance, but when he became popular, he threw himself aside. But Stephen Chow has worked with so many people, both as a director and a supporting actor, and reached the peak when he worked with him. When he became a director, he reached the point where it didn't matter who finished the work.

If nothing else, comedies have become children's movies. Those retarded jokes can't make me laugh at all, but only make me feel ashamed to watch such a movie. I don't even know how dare they shoot them. I haven't touched a Hong Kong comedy for a long time. Stupid and vulgar. If the success or failure of the film is in the hands of a few people rather than the whole audience, then the decline is inevitable. Hong Kong movies are not movies because that kind of power is too concentrated. It is a tool of power and a tool to cheat money. The audience doesn't matter, and directors and actors don't have to work hard ―― just clean up a powerful person. At that time, Hong Kong films had reached a period when the overall theme was exhausted. Those famous works in the past, such as Jin Yong, Gu Long, pornography and gambling, etc. Shooting everywhere, natural themes and new ideas will be less and less. Coupled with the heavy blow of the financial turmoil, investors will make movies without watching movies, and then invest less and less, a vicious circle. At this time, the policy did not guide innovation, or just "fried rice." The rise and fall of Hong Kong films is naturally determined by the market and capital. When a person is not paid attention to and treated in the early stage of illness, it will be of little significance until the late stage of cancer. Hong Kong movies are such a true portrayal.