Seek relevant data reflecting the unfairness of college admission.

1. The unfair college entrance examination system ruined famous universities such as Peking University, Tsinghua and Fudan University.

The numbers are real. Comparison of local enrollment in Peking University, Tsinghua University, Shanghai Jiaotong University and Fudan University in 2009 with Shandong, a populous province;

Peking University (Institute of Technology) admitted 180 students in Beijing, and only 38 students in Shandong.

Tsinghua enrolled 252 students (science and engineering) in Beijing, and only 62 students in Shandong.

Fudan University (Institute of Technology) enrolled 340 students in Shanghai and only 32 students in Shandong.

Shanghai Jiaotong University (Institute of Technology) enrolled 276 students in Shanghai, but only 99 students in Shandong.

Many provinces and autonomous regions have single digits!

This kind of geographical discrimination leads to the international ranking of China famous schools such as Peking University and Tsinghua getting worse and worse!

Peking University, Tsinghua, Jiaotong University and Fudan University are all universities of China people, not municipal schools.

2. Famous schools admit representatives from "eccentric" big cities to talk about educational equity

Deputy Wen Junyi pointed out that at present, due to the institutional defects of the education system, the lack of public education resources and the tendency of education marketization, the opportunities for citizens to receive education are unfair to a considerable extent. For example, he said that in 2003, the Ministry of Education announced that higher education in China had been popularized. The enrollment rate in Beijing reached 49% in that year (52% in 2004), while the gross enrollment rate in Yunnan Province in 2002/2003 was only 8.64%. The proportion of local students in colleges and universities is: Peking University 17%, Tsinghua 16%, Beihang University 13%, Beijing University1%,Fudan University, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Wuhan University, 47%, 50%. In 2003, for example, there were 90,000 candidates in Beijing, but Peking University and Tsinghua allocated enrollment indicators, and one of the 8/kloc-0 candidates went to Peking University and Tsinghua. In Henan with 500,000 candidates, the enrollment index is only 168, and only 2,976 people have attended Peking University Tsinghua.

Deputy Wen Junyi believes that the government is the "first responsible person" to realize educational equity, and it is necessary to clearly realize the great role of educational opportunity equity in people, long-term social development and overall efficiency improvement. Otherwise, no matter how much investment is made in education, the phenomenon of "ignoring or even discriminating against certain groups and regions at the expense of their interests" cannot be fundamentally eliminated.

Wen Junyi believes that what should be reformed is the college entrance examination enrollment system. At present, the focus of the reform is the allocation of enrollment places in big cities, and it is best to allocate enrollment places evenly according to the number of candidates. In other words, it is necessary to relatively unify the enrollment ratio of colleges and universities, especially famous universities, in the national college entrance examination.

3、

It is unfair to allocate places by province for college enrollment.

In the suggestion of the website of the Ministry of Education, netizens think that the allocation of enrollment quotas in colleges and universities is unfair, and the allocation of enrollment quotas that China has followed for a long time lacks the consideration of regional fairness. Because the admission places in different places are not set according to the number of candidates, the admission rates vary greatly from place to place. The admission rates of college entrance examinations in developed areas such as Shanghai, Beijing and Tianjin reached 70% and 80%.

In areas with a large population and a large number of candidates, I am afraid that not many will reach 50%, which is not conducive to the development and social progress of poor and underdeveloped areas. This is also the main reason for the frequent immigration of college entrance examination in recent years.

4. It is extremely unfair to set the proportion of college entrance examination according to 1: 1.2.

No matter the traditional way of "volunteering first, following scores" or "parallel volunteer", every year, a considerable number of online candidates will inevitably be unable to enter their favorite universities or even lose the opportunity to enter universities for further study because of improper college entrance examination admission rules, so that students' ten-year cold window will be wasted.

This rule is the proportion of college entrance examination stipulated by the education department:1:1.05 ~1.2! This setting is entirely based on the interests of colleges and universities, realizing the maximization of the interests of colleges and universities while ignoring the unfair and extremely unreasonable rules of the game formulated by the interests of candidates!

In the traditional way of "giving priority to volunteers and following scores", it is very risky for candidates to fill in their volunteers. If the candidate's first choice is not accurate, the possibility of the second choice is very small, because people have accepted their first choice and don't look at the second choice at all. On the surface, "parallel volunteer" seems to consider the interests of candidates, which brings benefits to candidates, but it is more risky. The main reason is that when applying for colleges and universities, it is not based on the actual number of local admissions, but on the admission ratio of 105- 120%, which means that 5-20% of candidates will be ruthlessly eliminated, greatly increasing the risk of candidates filling in their volunteers.

5. The population of Beijing is about160,000. Last year, the enrollment index of Peking University and Tsinghua was 851; Henan has a population of more than 97 million, but the indicators of the two universities are only 17 1. Of the 65438+7000 people in Beijing, 1 can go to Tsinghua in Peking University, while of the 567000 people in Henan, only 1 can be so lucky, with a difference of 33 times. The imbalance between college entrance examination scores and admission indicators is one of the focuses discussed by delegates at the Fourth Session of the Tenth National People's Congress. The delegates questioned: "Why do the same scores have different fates? This is so unfair! "

Because there are more national key universities in Beijing and Shanghai than in other provinces, the enrollment of key universities is greatly tilted to the location, and the enrollment quota far exceeds that of other provinces. Therefore, the minimum admission scores of key universities in Beijing and Shanghai are dozens or even hundreds of points lower than those in most provinces. For example, in 2005, the admission score of key liberal arts universities in Beijing was 486, and that of Shanghai was 497. Henan 565 points, Sichuan 570 points.

In recent years, the phenomenon of "college entrance examination immigration" has been repeatedly banned, mainly because the scores of enrollment vary greatly from place to place. The scores and enrollment indicators of key universities are inclined to big cities and developed areas, which brings greater injustice to society and easily leads to serious polarization between economically and culturally backward areas and developed areas.

The same score can only be an ordinary undergraduate in Hubei, Shandong, Sichuan and other places; And such a score, in Beijing and Shanghai, can go to Fudan University in Tsinghua, Peking University! And Peking University is not just a university for Beijingers; Fudan is not just a nursery for Shanghainese. It's like a game. People born in Shandong have to run 10000 meters to reach the finish line, while people born in Beijing only need to run 1000 meters to reach the finish line. The unfair fate of the candidates was doomed at the moment of starting. Educational injustice is the biggest injustice in a society. When can the educational ills of geographical discrimination candidates be eliminated? What kind of candidates do you prefer in Beijing and Shanghai?

So many people put forward the proposition that the college entrance examination is unified by the state, and all provinces and cities in the country are included in the unified examination scope. When enrolling students, geographical boundaries are abolished, and all candidates are treated equally according to their scores. At the same time, the number of students who walk, special students and orientation students will be cancelled, and the number of mobile places and the qualifications for point recruitment in colleges and universities will be cancelled. For underdeveloped areas, the increased investment in education will be transferred from the state finance to help them develop basic education. But in theory, everyone should be equal in front of the test paper, but the education level varies from place to place. If the score line is unified throughout the country, it will be unfair to economically underdeveloped areas. It is likely that all the students who can go to a good school come from economically developed areas, but none of them will. Therefore, this proposal of unified national proposition and unified admission is not desirable.