The construction of new countryside is not the reason why cultivated land "grows" villas.

The construction of new countryside is not

Cultivated land is "long"

The reason for the villa

Official website, the Xinyang Municipal Government of Henan Province released the progress in the investigation and handling of the incident, saying that it will resolutely dismantle the illegally occupied houses and seriously investigate the responsibilities of relevant units and responsible persons according to the law and discipline. At the same time, once checked in the end, resolutely take the initiative in food security and hold the red line of cultivated land. ?

A 270-square-meter house costs only 450,000 yuan, and the price per square meter is 1000. In the context of high housing prices, such cheap townhouses are really attractive. No wonder many city people are rushing to buy them. However, discerning people know at a glance that no matter how cheap the price is, it can't cover up the illegal facts behind the house. In the name of new rural construction, the local government built townhouses on the land that originally belonged to basic farmland for sale, and then handled the rural construction planning permit and land use certificate. To put it bluntly, it is to "commercialize" houses that should meet the living needs of farmers.

Protecting basic farmland is the unshirkable responsibility of governments at all levels. Over the years, the central government has repeatedly asked to keep the red line of 65.438+0.8 billion mu of cultivated land, and its attitude and measures are unprecedented. The Government Work Report also specifically puts forward: "Strengthen the protection of cultivated land, resolutely curb the" non-agricultural "of cultivated land and prevent" non-grain ". All localities must be clear about these laws, regulations and policy requirements. In particular, in view of the problems of building houses by occupying cultivated land indiscriminately, building houses in violation of the red line control requirements of ecological protection, and illegal purchase of homesteads and houses with small property rights by urban residents, the relevant departments clearly demanded that "illegal land use be legalized without registration".

However, under high pressure, Pingqiao District of Xinyang City can still build houses on cultivated land and sell them publicly, which only shows that many laws, regulations and policies often encounter some obstacles when they reach the grassroots level in some places, and it is difficult to really put them in place, while the local government and relevant departments tacitly fail to check and correct them. Even if it is exposed, it will only be dealt with "resolutely" for specific cases. This ignorance, slowness and even disobedience in the implementation of central government decrees and administration according to law have also had many negative effects, which not only harmed the interests of the public, but also affected the process of government's rule of law construction.

Despite the banner of building a new countryside, is it true that the regulatory authorities at all levels do not know that Pingqiao District of Xinyang City is building houses on basic farmland? Not necessarily. Building a house is not a secret matter, but also involves all aspects of departments and links. How can you hide it? What's more, these houses have also handled rural construction planning permits and land use permits. One detail is intriguing: the director of Xiaodian Township Land Management Office in Pingqiao District is not only indifferent to the "long" villa of cultivated land, but also actively helps to promote the villa, which is really shocking. ?

It seems impossible to tell all the facts clearly just by accusing the regulatory authorities of failing to perform their duties. Why can villas be built smoothly on cultivated land? Why did a series of barriers from village organizations to township governments and land management departments fall down? Coupled with the factors of developers, what kind of interests are entangled in this? These problems still need thorough investigation and a responsible explanation to the public. In this way, we can truly "do not evade the problem and check it out."

It can also be seen from this incident that in some places, the phenomenon of not administering according to law and doing whatever you want still exists. After a central government decree came down, some places did not try to implement it, but racked their brains to exploit loopholes and play tricks. Originally, the central government advocated the construction of new countryside in order to improve the rural living environment and improve the quality of farmers' production and life. But in some places, it has been distorted into real estate and occupied cultivated land indiscriminately. This kind of governance level and ability is worrying. ?

The Notice of Eight Prohibitions on Unauthorized Occupation of Cultivated Land for Building in Rural Areas jointly issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs clearly requires that it is not allowed to illegally occupy cultivated land for building under various pretexts. These bans listed in the Notice cover many important tasks such as rural revitalization, beautiful countryside, new rural construction, facility agriculture, ex situ poverty alleviation and relocation. This also shows that there are indeed many places where many people are thinking about these jobs.

The construction of new countryside is not the reason for "long" villas on cultivated land. ?

In this regard, on the one hand, it is necessary to strengthen top-down inspections and inspections, continue to maintain policy pressure, and resolutely put an end to all kinds of administrative behaviors of "selling dog meat" so that good policies can truly benefit thousands of households; ?

On the other hand, it is necessary to constantly strengthen the legal awareness of government officials at all levels, so that they can truly respect the law, abide by policies and improve their ruling ability. In addition, we should broaden the channels for reporting and complaining, so that the voice of "below" can also be heard from "above". Once the information is communicated, the space for random manipulation at the grassroots level will be greatly reduced.