Job Recruitment Website - Immigration policy - 20 13 how difficult is it to take the postgraduate entrance examination in English?

20 13 how difficult is it to take the postgraduate entrance examination in English?

This problem can be said to vary from person to person. Most people think that the postgraduate entrance examination is difficult in vocabulary and grammar. Actually, it's not about vocabulary and grammar. Vocabulary and grammar are no longer a problem for students who have passed TEM-8 and TEM-6 and got high marks. TEM-8 12000 words, 5500 for postgraduate entrance examination, and 5000 for CET-6. And grammar, as long as you finish high school, there is almost no new grammar. As for the characteristics of familiar words, they do exist in the postgraduate entrance examination, but they are only a few, and the threat to candidates has not formed a climate.

The real difficulty in postgraduate English lies in the trap!

This is almost extinct in Band 4, Band 4 and Band 8. However, there are many traps in the objective questions of postgraduate entrance examination, that is, cloze, reading and new questions. For example, in reading: stealing concepts, generalizing the whole, making something out of nothing, expanding the scope and so on.

Here, talk about the gestalt. In the gestalt, the questioner did the simplest trick.

For example, in 2008 1 1, (note: please read an option first and judge its meaning before reading it) option D.

Inexplicably, many candidates understand this word as: countless. The result was particularly smooth, the result was wrong, and points were lost. As everyone knows, when being fooled by the questioner, the word should be: unexplained. Note that the root of this word is: account.

As a verb: explain, not count. As a verb, count. This is a word in high school vocabulary. Here, the questioner expects the examinee to mistake this word for: countless, and then take it back to answer the wrong question.

The following is a setting of cloze interference item: it is called: word interference. To put it bluntly, it is hiding.

There have been three similar obvious smoke screens in the last decade, namely:

There are 38 questions in 2002, and option D is valid. This is a word that doesn't exist at all. Note that effect is a noun, effect is its verb form, and then you can add ed.

Question 3 1 in 2003, option C. personnel, some people misread it as: individual, in fact: personnel;

Similarly, the title of 3 1 in 2003, option D. corporation, was misunderstood as: cooperation, actually: company;

Unusually ingenious: if option C. personnel mistakenly thinks: private, that is, it is synonymous with option B. individuals and individuals; If option d.

The company misreads it as cooperation, that is, cooperation with option A.

Discrimination of group, group and synonym. The setting of the questioner's interference item is not unreasonable and arbitrary. Here, the questioner in 2003 can be said to have played the word form analysis to the extreme!

It can be seen that it may be difficult for candidates to overcome this bottleneck if they don't understand the essence (trap) of English for postgraduate entrance examination. Therefore, if the candidate only focuses on review and does not make a good analysis, it is probably the opposite direction.