What is the household registration system for college entrance examination?

The household registration system of college entrance examination refers to a system that the state stipulates that candidates for college entrance examination must take the college entrance examination in their household registration places and apply for colleges and universities. The household registration system of college entrance examination is the product of China's national conditions, and it is a system that allows people to enjoy equal education rights as fairly as possible.

After the resumption of the college entrance examination in China, although the national unified examination was implemented, in fact, provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions were still the admission units. The allocation of educational resources is based on provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions. Within a province, city and autonomous region, it is relatively equal's competition, but it is not fair competition among provinces, cities and autonomous regions. University enrollment quotas are divided into provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions. Under such a pattern, the admission scores of different provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions are different. This problem has existed since 1977 resumed the college entrance examination. Within the scope of China, there is basically a contradiction between the allocation of higher education resources by provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions and citizens' choice of education.

Nowadays, with the development of economy, this educational problem caused by backward system design tends to expand. The issue of children's college entrance examination right is often criticized together with the household registration system because it is linked to the household registration system, and is regarded as a sign of "discrimination against foreigners" and "exclusion" in big cities such as Beishangguang. Foreigners working in these big cities feel wronged, and local residents feel unfair. The difference between local and foreign countries, which did not exist originally, is produced in the long-term contradiction of resource allocation.

Due to the different levels of economic development between cities and rural areas, big cities and small cities, the gap between the rich and the poor has become a reality. Faced with such a situation, the macro-control of the country should be tilted to the areas and fields with weak education to achieve relative fairness. The reality is that the poor are getting poorer, the rich are getting richer, and the winner takes all. This is the "Matthew effect" often mentioned in economics, and this effect is more obvious in the field of education. Urban children have received more state education funds since childhood, and the state has basically invested limited education funds in cities. On the contrary, children in rural areas, especially in poor areas, are not only severely discriminated against in training funds, but also treated unfairly in further education and employment.

Of course, whether it is resource allocation or population mobility, in the final analysis, it is still necessary to talk about the household registration system. Although except for the first-tier cities like Beishangguang, the threshold for foreigners to enter the household has gradually decreased, the logic of the household registration system based on household registration has not changed, whether it is buying a house, buying a car, getting married and having children go to school. If the household registration system is not changed, neither the national unified college entrance examination nor the special policy support can finally solve the college entrance examination problem for the children of migrant workers. This is also the fundamental reason why there is still a market for college entrance examination household registration, no matter how foreign parents appeal and how critics and scholars lash it. Although Zhang requested to examine whether the restriction on the household registration of the college entrance examination violated the provisions of the Education Law on equal rights in education, the legal source of the household registration of the college entrance examination was the household registration system. Even if the right to equality in education in the education law is different from the household registration system, it has long been decided which one will win without the unconstitutional review system in China.

20 10 the results of the sixth national census show that more than 220 million people in China have left their domicile to work or live in other places. Taking Beijing as an example, according to the statistics of relevant scholars, there are10.2 million primary and secondary school students in Beijing, and there are 900,000 school-age left-behind children whose parents work in Beijing. Moreover, the parents of these 900,000 children are not only the migrant workers of the disadvantaged groups we have been talking about, but also a considerable number of urban white-collar workers who have settled in the city, have stable jobs and incomes, and have contributed a lot of taxes to the city. Moreover, human nature, scarcity of things is precious, coupled with a series of social problems brought by left-behind children and the continuous loss of outstanding foreign students, the problem of college entrance examination household registration and college entrance examination immigration has become a new type of "urban dilemma", and changing the college entrance examination household registration is actually the general trend.

In the era of reform and development as the theme, there are inevitably some downward forces that are dragging their feet. On the issue of educational equity, for example, the bonus system aimed at promoting fairness has changed the taste of purchasing power and money; For example, non-governmental programs aimed at improving the education of children of floating population in cities are misunderstood as crowding out educational resources.