Did the Japanese invade China to plunder and enslave the people of China to get rid of the economic crisis? Nazi Germany has not been passed down.

The way to divert the crisis was used by Britain and France.

Before World War II, there were several ways to solve the global economic crisis.

American model: the state intervenes in the economy and combines the market economy with national macro-control, which is also the means adopted by most countries in the world. The main body of the economy is the market, but when the market cannot be adjusted, the state intervenes to correct the problems existing in economic liberalization.

Facts have proved that Roosevelt's New Deal is very correct. Of course, it is also attributed to the economic situation of the United States: a large population, a vast territory and a developed economy. The United States makes full use of stimulating domestic demand to strengthen its economy and get it out of trouble.

Anglo-French model: transferring the crisis, that is, making full use of the vast colonies of Britain and France and exchanging part of sovereignty for trade rights, that is, partially recognizing colonial sovereignty, strengthening trade exports to colonies, stimulating the economy with exports, and alleviating the trauma suffered by Britain and France in the economic crisis.

Fascist model: that is, the model of Germany, Japan, Italy and other countries, expanding abroad under various pretexts and diverting people's attention with the model of aggression, so as to alleviate the trauma of the economic crisis to the country.

The fascist model is actually useless to solve the economic crisis: the economic crisis of 1929- 1933 is mainly due to the overproduction and deflation caused by market liberalization, that is, there are many commodities, but consumers have overdrawn in the previous economic overheating, which makes it impossible to continue buying commodities at this time. However, because consumers are clutching their wallets, it is difficult to sell goods, and the investment of producers cannot be recovered and cannot be continued.

And draw lessons from three models: the American model is to stimulate domestic demand and intervene in the economy, that is, to adjust the disorder of production links, while the state assists banks and enterprises to stabilize the economy, enhance consumer confidence, stimulate market recovery with national strength, consumers start shopping, and enterprises reproduce, which requires hiring labor. After people have jobs and incomes, they become consumers, which promotes the recovery of the consumer market.

The Anglo-French model, that is, using colonies without surplus products to sell goods in exchange for giving up some colonial privileges in exchange for trade, solves internal problems by expanding foreign trade: selling surplus goods to areas without surplus goods to obtain funds, while expanding domestic foreign trade requires increasing production and solving labor problems, thus promoting domestic economic recovery.

However, the fascist model is different: it adopts the way of armed external expansion, violently occupies the invaded country, plunders resources and labor, and expands aggression. But in fact, this way, in this economic crisis, failed to solve any step: plundering resources, not increasing the strength of producers, plundering labor, and not solving the problem of insufficient domestic consumption-it turns out that after World War II, the Japanese people's life was much worse than that of China: at that time, Japanese nationals could still eat sweet potatoes and miscellaneous grains, but many Japanese people could not even eat sweet potatoes and seedlings. At that time, the hardships of ordinary Japanese people after the war can be imagined. Moreover, armed aggression is bound to arouse the hatred of the people of the invaded country and is not conducive to market expansion.

The reason why fascists use this model is obviously to divert contradictions and eyes: if a country is in a state of war, especially a modern country, it will be much easier to manage-everything is centered on war, and all human and material resources must unconditionally obey the needs of war, which makes the contradictions of the economic crisis marginalized and secondary, and then makes the country a war machine, in which everyone is a part. If the country is peaceful, there are many problems that the country needs to solve: economy, culture, education and so on; But if you are in war mode, then everything is for war-you need soldiers to solve the labor problem; If you need materials, you can plunder them or collect them at home.