Job Recruitment Website - Immigration policy - What's the difference between immigrant countries and non-immigrant countries?
What's the difference between immigrant countries and non-immigrant countries?
1. Immigrant countries refer to those countries that have a clear policy of accepting foreigners into their nationality or welcoming foreigners to obtain permanent residency in their country. This clear policy means that this immigration country has relevant special departments to deal with immigrants, and has a set of special immigration methods, immigration classification and immigration quotas.
For example, Australia is a country of immigrants. First of all, there is a special department called the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC Immigration for short), which has special immigration laws, including employer-sponsored immigration, general skilled immigration, family reunion immigration, investment immigration, etc. The number of immigrants to be absorbed is determined according to the figures of the population survey every year.
2. Non-immigrant countries do not have a set of open immigration conditions to deal with, and there are very few cases where they can immigrate. For example:
China is a non-immigrant country. First of all, there is no immigration office in China. Secondly, immigration to China can only be achieved through marriage or adoption. Other foreigners can get visas to stay in China for a long time, but there is no fixed quota for them to become China citizens every year.
- Related articles
- Advantages and disadvantages of Irish immigrants
- American green card number!
- Regret emigrating to South Africa
- How long can I get a residence permit in Shangshui County?
- Brief introduction of Weijiatan town
- In which city is Yaotou Village located?
- What do you mean by snakes?
- Enlightenment from the conflict in Cajamarca
- David Jiang's words came true, and the big coat was exposed. Honest people are dishonest! what do you think?
- Why did Confucius and Mencius insist on benevolent governance? Don't they know that benevolent government was difficult at that time?