The Relationship between Modernism Design and Internationalism Design Style

The relationship between all things is difference and connection.

Modernist design and internationalist design styles have both similarities and differences.

Similarities between modernist design and internationalist design (emphasis, self-expansion): From the root point of view, they are in the same strain, both of which are new modernism combined with the actual development of the United States after Bauhaus leaders came to the United States. The design styles come down in one continuous line, and all have the characteristics of simple form, anti-decoration, emphasis on function and systematization. The design forms are all minimalism. It is worth mentioning that internationalist design was influenced by Misvandro's "less is more", and then developed into reductionism, even ignoring functional requirements. This design concept obviously betrays the basic principles of modernist design.

The difference between modernist design and internationalist design: the ideology is very different. Modernist design has a strong color of socialist democracy and is a typical idealistic activity of intellectuals (Europeans all have this ideology, which is completely different from the United States where immigrants are prevalent, you know! Therefore, modernist design is a means to try every means to reverse the situation that design serves the upper level and the public, and his exploration is progressive (although Mi succeeded). She emphasized that the purpose and function of design are the first. Then I went to the United States, and there were fewer and more missions, which were warmly welcomed. Reinforced concrete prefabricated structure and glass curtain wall structure are harmoniously integrated, which has become the standard appearance of internationalism. However, the big birds in the modern design society are gradually abandoned. The original democratic color has become a simple business style, and it has become the pursuit of formalism for the sake of form (a bit awkward), leaving only the thin shell of reductionism. Therefore, internationalism is very fragile and began to decline after the 1980 s.

If it is a postgraduate entrance examination, I wish you success.