Differences and Relations between Internationalism Style and Postmodernism Style

The relationship between all things is difference and connection.

Modernist design and internationalist design styles have both similarities and differences.

Similarities between modernist design and internationalist design (emphasis, self-expansion): from the root point of view, they are all neo-modernism developed in the United States after Bauhaus leaders came to the United States. The design styles come down in one continuous line, and all have the characteristics of simple form, anti-decoration, emphasis on function and systematization. The design form is minimalism. It is worth mentioning that the internationalist design developed under the influence of Misvandro's "less is more".

The difference between modernist design and internationalist design: the ideology is very different. Modernist design has a strong color of socialist democracy, which is a typical idealistic activity of intellectuals (Europeans all have this ideology, which is completely different from the United States where immigrants are prevalent, you know! Therefore, modernist design is a means to try every means to reverse the situation of designing for the upper level and serving the public. His exploration is progressive (though Rice is successful). She emphasizes that the purpose and functionality of design come first. Later, when he came to the United States, Missism was warmly welcomed, and the reinforced concrete prefabricated structure and the glass curtain wall structure were harmoniously integrated. It has become the standard face of internationalism, and the big birds in the society in modernist design are gradually abandoned. The original democratic color has become a simple business style, and it has become the pursuit of formalism for the sake of form (a bit awkward), leaving only the thin shell of reductionism. Therefore, internationalism is very fragile and began to decline after the 1980 s.