Why do China people seldom oppose globalization?

Why do China people seldom oppose globalization?

At the same time, China's textbooks and official propaganda have been sparing no effort to educate people about "the deepening of global economic integration" and "the inexorable process of globalization", and highlight the benefits and progress of China in globalization. These teachings, together with those tangible achievements, make the promotion of globalization and opening to the outside world almost unquestionable "political correctness" in China.

Secondly, the social atmosphere in China is different from that in the West. After World War II, welfarism rose in the west, emphasizing the government's obligations and responsibilities to the people. Coupled with the influence of electoral politics, the spirit of individual responsibility for himself gradually declined. Everyone feels that their demands are bigger than the sky. There is nothing wrong with them, but the society and others are at fault. In this social atmosphere, it is easy for politicians to manipulate populism, find scapegoats and introduce disasters from the outside.

Social Darwinism prevails in China, and it is natural for everyone to strive for the upper reaches. On the one hand, it strengthens the competitiveness of China workers and China manufacturing workers. On the other hand, once a person loses in the competition, he will blame himself more, find reasons from himself, and tend to get help through the network of relatives and friends to make a comeback. Few people will place high hopes on the government in this respect, and generally they will not blame external competition too much. In fact, most people in China keep a respectful distance from the government, and their requirements for the government are basically limited to "just leave me alone". In this way, even if someone loses his job because the factory moves to Southeast Asia, it is unlikely that Indonesian or Vietnamese workers will rob him of his job, let alone expect the government to stand up for himself. For the sake of maintaining relations with neighboring countries, the government also stressed the necessity of industrial upgrading in China, which made the xenophobic and anti-competitive remarks lack fans in China.

China's globalization is selective.

Third, so far, China's embrace of globalization has been selective and restrained, mainly in the fields of economy and trade, but not in the fields of capital, personnel flow and ideology, which has enabled China to fully enjoy the benefits of globalization and avoid related risks and traps. Take population mobility as an example: an important reason for Britain's withdrawal from the EU is that the EU's open border policy has caused a large influx of immigrants and refugees, which has overwhelmed them; In recent years, terrorist attacks have occurred frequently in Europe because too many Muslim immigrants have been absorbed in the past half century and failed to integrate; In the United States, illegal immigration is also a very sensitive social issue. The reason why refugees and immigrants can take root in Europe and America is because these countries have a series of policies that are enough for refugees and immigrants to stay. For example, even if you don't have legal status, you can go to school for medical treatment, and the expenses are borne by the government; There will be an Amnesty soon, and illegal immigrants will be legal overnight. These policies objectively encouraged the influx of refugees and illegal immigrants.

None of these advantages exist in China. 1982, China signed the Convention and the Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees. By August of 20 14, * * had received about 400,000 refugees, including more than 260,000 Vietnamese refugees at the end of 1970, 60,000 Afghan refugees at the end of 1980 and 20,000 Afghan refugees at the end of1980. These people basically stayed in China for a short time and most of them were repatriated. As for the rights and obligations of the left-behind refugees, there are only some vague principles in China law. Therefore, although China is accepting refugees, it has not established a long-term mechanism to accept them. Refugees have no right to work in China, and their children cannot take the college entrance examination. These practical difficulties have greatly hindered China from becoming a major refugee destination country.

Recommend for you

Facing the refugee tide: Europe should not build its own fortress

So do illegal immigrants. In Guangzhou, where I live, it is said that there are 300,000 Africans living and working here, and the official figure is 60,000. It is said that some of them are illegal residents whose visas have expired. However, the number of these people is relatively small at first, whether it is 300,000 or 60,000, which is insignificant compared with the population of nearly 20 million in Guangzhou. Although some of them are repugnant to the local people, they have not caused much trouble or had a significant impact on the employment and life of the local people, so everyone can basically live in peace. One of the important reasons why Merkel's refugee policy caused a fierce rebound was that too many people came. Germany, with a population of 80 million, poured in 1 10,000 refugees within one year, which had a great impact on the original social order and public security. Secondly, China's policy made these Africans only stay for a short time. No matter how long they stay in China, it is basically impossible for them to obtain China status. During their stay, they will also face many obstacles in the education of their children, which greatly reduces the possibility of illegal refugees staying for a long time. It should be emphasized that these regulations are not the special restrictions imposed by the China government on foreign refugees and immigrants, but the inevitable result of China's unique household registration system. A Hunan native came to Guangdong to work, and his experience was similar to that of these refugees and immigrants.

As can be seen from the above, China's positive attitude towards globalization, whether official or private, is based on some special national conditions and strategies of China. In any case, China's attitude not only reassured enterprises, individuals and countries worried about the world falling into a state of self-cleaning, but also provided China with an important historical opportunity to establish the image of a guardian of free trade and enhance its soft power and international appeal. Of course, China may not be able to fill the vacancy left by the United States. America's leading position is not only based on its strong material strength, but also because it has contributed a series of far-reaching advanced ideas, concepts, systems and rules to the world. In these respects, China still has a long way to go. German Foreign Minister Steinmeier believes that Trump's inauguration means that "the old order of the 20th century has ended, and the order of 2 1 century and what the future world will be like have not yet been determined, and everything is possible." In the process of participating in shaping the new order, China's selective globalization strategy is bound to be challenged, and the degree of domestic reform will also be a decisive factor in what role China can play in the new order.