Why did Pearl Buck Nobel Prize in Literature fail?

Personally, it's not a failure. If we want to think about this problem, we must return to Nobel Prize in Literature's evaluation criteria. Old Swedish men certainly don't think their comments are ideological or racial. Although they all claim that their standards are "excellent literary works with idealistic tendencies", we all know that absolute fairness does not exist in this world. Pearl S. Buck's works came into public view through the description of local themes in China. According to a fair evaluation, it is not difficult to find ten people in China who are better at writing such subjects than him. Pearl S. Buck's works were recognized by the Nobel Prize Committee, and it was indeed the special cultural background that took the lead. A relatively unfamiliar foreign theme+English writing background+the blessing of Pulitzer Prize really adds a lot to Pearl Buck. Throughout the history of Nobel Prize in Literature 100, there are too many people who are not worthy of the name. Pearl Buck is really not a bad writer, and even among them, she deserves it. In addition, I think Mo Yan deserves it, and his later works are better. At the same time, I think China writers are much better than Mo Yan. But whether you have Mo Yan's luck is another matter.