Are Chinese entrepreneurs a "vulnerable group"?

However, entrepreneurs are still dissatisfied. It is said that when "Chinese Entrepreneur" determined the theme of the 2010 annual meeting, it initially wanted to set it as "New Business, New Conflict, New Power". Later, after much consideration and careful consideration, the organizer only changed "New Conflict" two days before the meeting. Changed to "New *Consciousness". But despite this, the entrepreneurs who spoke at the scene talked about "new conflicts" from various aspects. Why are “new conflicts” discussed at a gathering of entrepreneurs who are already the darlings of the times? What else are they dissatisfied with? Xu Xiaonian, who has always had sharp views, recently talked about the decline of entrepreneurship in China, but he believed that the problem did not lie with the entrepreneurs themselves. “In China, the rise of a strong government and a power culture are the fundamental reasons for the decline of entrepreneurship. Overseas, Immigration, flight from industry and even civil servants are symptoms of this.” It is said that this sentence received warm applause from the entrepreneurs present. Clearly, the issue of strong government and power culture has gained traction among the entrepreneurial community. This phenomenon reflects a problem: Although China's entrepreneurial groups are glamorous on the surface, they still have "dissatisfaction" in their hearts. If they just want to make money and don't care about anything else, then it will be easy for them to get along in China. Nowadays, China, which is developing rapidly, is a good time to fish in troubled waters and make a lot of money. At present, China has a larger group with wealth and power, but they just enjoy it and remain silent - they are the biggest beneficiaries of the current system, and they are also the group most satisfied with the current system. However, if entrepreneurs also want to express or achieve something with ideals, such as fairness and justice, democratization, deep institutional reform, political participation, state-owned enterprise monopoly reform, etc., they will immediately encounter various obstacles. Observing the activities of Chinese entrepreneurial groups, we can find that state-owned enterprise executives and private entrepreneurs are two completely different tribes. Except for a very few people such as Qin Xiao and Ning Gaoning, state-owned enterprise executives cannot mix with China's private entrepreneurs. In many public entrepreneurial activities that concern society, it is rare to see senior executives from central enterprises. Executives of state-owned enterprises are closer to government officials. They are completely within the system. They use the resources of the system and eat the food of the system. They have different paths and do not work together. They are certainly not on the same path as private entrepreneurs. If you exclude the group of state-owned enterprise executives, China's entrepreneurial group will only consist of private entrepreneurs. As a result, they will be a group of single and weak people. In fact, entrepreneurs who are prominent in the market and wealth still lack political expression and influence in institutional changes. Although many businessmen in China strive to squeeze into the CPPCC and National People's Congress and get close to government officials, hoping to become a red-top businessman like Hu Xueyan. Many entrepreneurs do business like a bureau, hoping to tie the government, market and themselves together. However, in China's social life and political landscape, they are still a group that lacks substantial influence and cannot even form a sufficient climate. Final Analysis Conclusion: The pattern of a strong government and strong interest groups has been solidified in China and is constantly strengthening. Without major reforms, there is simply no way to change this! In this regard, although this group of private entrepreneurs in China have the opportunity to walk on red carpets, be in and out of the spotlight, and are sought after by the media and envied by society, they are still a "weak" group in China's political and economic arena. When they encounter a strong government and powerful interest groups, their "weakness" will immediately be revealed.

(The content of this article comes from Anbang Consulting Comments. It is only for learning. No one may use it for commercial purposes. Violators are responsible for their own responsibility)