Why do Chinese people only value ethical thinking but not logical thinking?

Is this caused by customs and education habits?

I saw an article on the Internet - Are there problems with Chinese people’s logical thinking? (If there is any infringement in the reprint, please contact us to delete it)

Secondly, in addition to the misunderstandings of logical analogies, many people in China are also accustomed to making generalizations and generalizations, that is, using individual phenomena to summarize a country and a country. society. In addition, many people in China are also accustomed to using individual criminal cases in Canada (such as the Lin Jun case) to summarize the security situation in Canada as a whole, etc. This is also a serious overgeneralization. In contrast, a few years ago, after the beheading of Chinese immigrant Li Weiguang on a long-distance bus in Canada, the Canadian media was very low-key about his race, and Canadians did not say anything about "Chinese" because of this. He was just a human being.

The third thinking habit is to look at individual cases instead of the mainstream. For example, there was a gathering of filmmakers in Beijing, and someone said that good looks would give you an advantage if you go to film school. So someone immediately criticized and said: "That's not necessarily true. Stars don't necessarily need to be beautiful, such as Ge You and Jiang Wen." In fact, they are right. There are indeed ordinary-looking stars, but looking at the world, stars are still much more beautiful. There is no doubt about it. In another case, when it was said that good will be rewarded with good and evil will be punished with evil, someone retorted: "This is wrong, I am very kind to so-and-so, but she repays kindness with evil." This person once again made the mistake of only looking at individual cases and not looking at the mainstream. From a mainstream perspective, good is rewarded with good and evil is rewarded with evil, not the other way around. If there are 99 people who are rewarded with good deeds, and one person is rewarded with evil deeds, then these people will focus on the one who is rewarded with good deeds, and completely deny that good deeds are rewarded with good deeds and evil deeds are deprived of evil deeds.

The fourth is black and white. Once, the author wrote in his blog that during the earthquake in Japan, the customers who were eating in the restaurant dispersed to take shelter, but after the earthquake, they consciously came back to pay the bill one by one. This is a reflection of social ethics. However, a middle school teacher severely criticized it on Weibo, saying that this was a traitor mentality, whitewashing Japanese militarism, and destroying our Chinese aspirations, and so on. I replied by email and said that the same thing is the same thing, and the quality of Japanese people, social ethics and militarism have nothing to do with each other. We cannot look at a country, a society, a nation or even an individual in black and white. Chinese people have long been brainwashed by black-and-white ideologies. They are used to a person or a thing being either good or bad. Therefore, in the movie, there is Hong Changqing on one side and Nan Batian on the other; the white-haired girl on the other side and Huang Shiren on the other.

Chinese people’s thinking habits can be said to be caused by the authoritarian system, the paternalistic style of saying everything, and the examination-oriented education that does not pay attention to truth inquiry. Those immigrant families do everything possible to immigrate just for the education of their children. The author also found that if Chinese children were educated in the United States or Canada since childhood, they would be much better off, and their thinking habits would be the same as those of native Western children.