Please translate it ~! Thank you A~!

Literal and binding.

Europeans are more formalistic and like to get entangled in details, especially in Germany and Britain. Americans, on the other hand, are flexible and casual. Almost every English gentleman knows what they should do without losing their gentlemanly manners, while Americans, although etiquette books are all over the city, rarely agree on customs and habits. Except in upper-class social occasions, most ordinary Americans come from various imho to discourage people from approaching hierarchy.

Because Americans are less restrained in their behavior in many ways, they behave too casually. They talk casually, dress casually, eat casually and have a casual attitude towards people. I don't know. They think Americans are indulgent and rude, and there is no system. This is a casual habit of Americans. Reflected in the use of English language, Americans' attitude towards their media newspapers often grieves some old scholars, while Hu's nonstandard expressions, which are widely used among the people, make many grammarians feel helpless. As for the words whose language implicitly expresses social hierarchy, Americans often disdain to ignore them. It may also be due to the lack of attention paid by Americans to imho, and their concept of discipline is relatively peer-to-peer, which often gives administrative officials and those who enforce discipline a headache. There is a saying that the British think it is fun to obey the rules, while the Americans take a tough approach to ask him for a definition in order to maintain their contempt and even insult him. In American party schools, students are lax in discipline, and American families and parents are lax in disciplining their children; In the American army, soldiers are notorious for being free and loose.

Surprisingly, American education has achieved varying degrees of success. Most American children have grown up to be good parents and citizens, and the American army has occasionally won some victories. This seemingly contradictory phenomenon may be explained: Americans love freedom and don't want to be forcibly controlled. However, when they really exercise their freedom rights, they are still bound by legal concepts, and proper limit is "free and unrestrained" within its jurisdiction. Although in fact, Americans seem to be unruly and don't respect the law, in fact, Americans are extremely advocating the rule of law. No country in the world studies law as hard as the United States, and lawyers in no country play such an important role in politics and daily life as the United States. Americans are constantly criticizing the slang of the President and Congress, but in the Supreme Court, they are afraid of the ghost coming back. This is perhaps the best example of Americans' right balance of randomness and restriction. Individualism and cooperative spirit.

The good thing about this individualism is that it promotes entrepreneurship, gives people opportunities, gives freedom and encourages diversification, thus promoting and helping the development of American industry, agriculture, science and technology, education, entertainment and sports. On the bad side, the unlimited expansion of individualism to nature has caused great damage to society, and has also left a thick frost on interpersonal relationships. Many people live miserable lives, are frustrated by human nature, or are distorted and cynical under the cold individualism competition and extrusion. Therefore, judging from the positive and negative factors of individualism, the key is how to suppress evil and promote good, which is also a "difficult problem" that has never been properly solved in American culture.

However, what is worth my taste is that Americans are willing to cooperate despite their strong individualism. It can be said that no western country except Britain is as willing to communicate voluntarily for a common purpose as Americans; No country has an American private association, and it is very effective.

On the European continent, it is often time-consuming and difficult to build a church, a college, a hospital and a charity. But in the United States, as long as interested individuals or groups can easily establish such institutions. As a result, various organizations have emerged-happy, good and prosperous business organizations, organizations that influence politics, organizations that collect historical materials, organizations that plan the future, organizations that study culture, organizations that own guns, and so on. Almost everyone in society has their own organization: boys and girls in school, businessmen and scholars, friends and residents, old immigrants and new immigrants, vegetarians and alcoholics, stamp collectors, heart patients and so on. , have their own organizations. This phenomenon shows that people still pay attention to the construction of community organizations while pursuing personality development, so as to ensure that the community can be orderly and stable and balance individual interests and collective interests to a certain extent.