How awesome is the Brahman caste in India?

Indian caste system is divided into four classes, including Brahman, Khrushchev, Veda and sudra, but under sudra, there is Dapu Rongsu, also known as Dalit. Foreigners who come to India, although not belonging to the caste system, will be brought into the caste system, and the simplest way to judge the grade is skin color, so the whiter the skin color, the higher the grade.

5 grades

In fact, I always thought that there were only four classes in India. In fact, strictly speaking, there are five classes, because the bottom class is called Dalits, also known as Dalits, who are not even qualified to enter the caste system, and these people are the most primitive indigenous people in India.

Above the untouchables is sudra, an Indian native who was invaded and conquered by Aryans. Surprisingly, "sudra" never thought of resisting from the day he was conquered and was enslaved for thousands of years. Today, they can only engage in the most basic work such as farming and grazing.

Above "sudra" is "Vedas", that is, ordinary Aryans. These people are common people in India. They have no privileges, but they will not be enslaved. They are the backbone of India and their main purpose is to pay taxes. They can do more work and no one has any restrictions on them. For example, the current Indian Prime Minister Modi is a "monk".

Above the "Vedas" are "Khshatrili", who are the leaders of the invaders, control the armed forces of the country and have the right to collect taxes, and are the main leaders of India. Above Khrushchev is Brahman. The significance of these people's existence is beyond our understanding, because religion has not been the mainstream since ancient times, so many friends must have such doubts. Why can a class in charge of religion become the highest class in a country?

This is because Brahmins are not only in charge of religion, but also monopolize Indian culture and education. In other words, this class not only controls the beliefs of ordinary believers, but also controls the beliefs of elite believers, so it has such a high status.

The Special Status of Brahman in India

"Brahman" comes from "Bora", which means "prayer". In India, prayer has great magic, so that good people can be blessed and evil people can be punished. "Brahman" is a priest who prays, equivalent to "God". Can he oppose God? Can you question God?

None of this can be done. "God" can only be repented, so "Brahman" enjoys many privileges. "Brahmins" do not have to pay all kinds of taxes, are not punished and are inviolable. In particular, the king of India belongs to Khrushchev and needs to guard the Brahman from generation to generation.

In addition, Indians should give gifts to Brahmins, so as to have security, preferably land. Therefore, Brahmins have a large area of land, and Brahmins enjoy permanent privileges, which means that all descendants of Brahmins are Brahmins.

The difference between Brahmanism and Buddhism

They are dominant. Buddhism is a vacuum theory. The biggest problem of all religions is dominance, such as monotheistic Christianity, Islam and Judaism. Hinduism and Taoism (Taoism is not the master originally, but once it becomes a religion, it will establish a master), while Confucianism is atheistic, but it is also the master of heaven. This is all an advantage theory.

Otherwise, there is only cause and effect in the world, and there is only emptiness in the world, which is more dominant than godlessness. The so-called law of Tao is also a causal karmic relationship between the universe, which is essentially empty. Buddha nature has always been there, but I don't know what nature is like. Buddha doesn't do anything. He doesn't care how the universe works. He is the perfect representative of Zhan Ran.

So the master of all gods and ideas (Plato's ideas are also). Buddhism believes that everything is viewed from the side. No, actually. Pay attention to whether it is wrong. Blind people touch elephants, and each person takes one. So some people say that Buddhism is atheism, which is not true after all, and it is a theory without dominance.