How about Li San water pump after sale?

Huangdao District Urban Construction Bureau Kunlunshan Road No Negative Pressure Water Supply Equipment Bidding Insider! I. Four valid quotations: 1. Shanghai Panda: 4.9 million; 2. Beijing Weipaige: 8 1.6 million; 3. Qingdao Lisan:12.92 million; 4. Guangdong Shengteng:13.3 million. The winning bidder is Qingdao Lisan. The difference between the winning bid price and the lowest quotation is 8.02 million yuan, and the difference between the winning bid price and the second lowest quotation is 4.76 million yuan. Second, it is also an effective quotation, which also meets the requirements of bidding. /kloc-0.292 million yuan is enough to buy two sets of the same equipment. Is the government's money wasted like this? How is it regulated? How to prevent corruption! The production cost of the equipment purchased this time is about 5 million in the same industry in China. Third, I want to ask the experts what they are doing during lunch break, and they will end the evaluation after working for more than 20 minutes in the afternoon. Why are the scores not made public? Excuse me, how much is your penny worth? Your scores alone determine the loss of the country from 5 million to 8 million yuan! Fourth, according to the bid opening procedure, the commercial bid, technical bid and qualification bid should be reviewed after the public quotation. Fifth, during the break, the authorized representative of the winning bidder took a paper bag (handed it to him when he saw anyone). Who did you give the paper bag to? Please play the video. Suspected of bribing experts! Please verify! Sixth, the highest price Guangdong Shengteng is suspected of accompanying the bid, please check.

Reply:

Dear netizen: Hello! After investigation and handling, the Huangdao District Government replied as follows:

After investigation, this procurement bidding was conducted in strict accordance with the provisions of the Measures for the Administration of Bidding for Government Procurement of Goods and Services. The bid evaluation method of procurement is comprehensive evaluation method, and price is only one of the bid evaluation factors, which can not determine whether the bid is won or not. The bid evaluation experts are randomly selected from the personnel pool that has obtained the qualification of government procurement bid evaluation experts according to law. The bid evaluation experts have no priority in evaluating the commercial tender and technical tender of each bidder, and there is no rest time during the bid evaluation. According to the provisions of the procurement documents, the business scores need to be signed by all suppliers, and the technical scores of all suppliers will not be published. The above contents have been explained in detail in the procurement documents. In response to your question that the winning bidder paid bribes to experts, Huangdao District Public Resources Trading Service Center checked the surveillance video of that day and found that the members of the bid evaluation committee did not leave the bid evaluation area during the whole bid evaluation period of the project, and did not find any private contact between the members of the bid evaluation committee and other irrelevant personnel. Finally, after verification with the authorized representative of the winning bidder, it was shown that there was indeed a case of going downstairs to eat with a paper bag full of materials at noon that day, which was consistent with the surveillance video, and there was no problem of bribing experts.

After the bid opening of this project, your Beijing Weipaige Technology Development Co., Ltd. has raised written questions about the above issues, and Huangdao District Urban Construction Bureau, Public Resources Trading Center and Qingdao Procurement Bidding Center Co., Ltd., the purchasing agent, have given written answers and communicated with your authorized representatives. The company representative has agreed to our reply.