I intend to take part in the debate. The topic is competition over cooperation. What about examples?

Modern society, whether collective or individual, is competing and cooperating. We can cooperate for the same interests or for different interests. In a word, competition and cooperation are everywhere. With the process of globalization, it brings more opportunities for competition and cooperation. Is competition more than cooperation or cooperation more than competition in modern society?

I think competition is more than cooperation.

Competition is the eternal motive force for the survival and development of a country and a nation. Without competition, a country and a nation will have no progress and development. Without the pressure of competition, one has no motivation to move forward. Today's world, today's society is a competitive world and a competitive society. Market economy is a competitive economy, and the core and basic principle of market economy is competition.

In terms of connotation, competition refers to people's struggles and contests for their own interests, or taking part in open competition. The result of competition is survival of the fittest. That is, survival of the fittest; Winners get, losers lose. As Darwin's theory of biological evolution said: "The fittest survive, and the unsuitable are eliminated." It can be seen that competition is a contest of strength, the strong can survive and develop, and the weak can be eliminated or destroyed; Competition is also a contest of wisdom. Talented and capable people win, mediocre people fail. In real life, competition is everywhere, all the time. For example, plants compete for sunlight, water and nutrients; Animals compete for territory, spouses and food; Competition among enterprises for raw materials; Compete for the market, sales, etc.

From our campus, the selection of class cadres is the best example of competition. The class teacher will choose good students with excellent academic performance as class cadres, which promotes competition to some extent. There is also competition among teachers. The amount of bonus is linked to the average score of each course. There are many high-scoring bonuses and few low-scoring bonuses, which undoubtedly forms competition. A university like Tsinghua Peking University must compete if it wants to enter, and the one with high scores wins. The person who scored low lost. The current employment problem also clearly reflects competition. According to statistics, since 1999, the enrollment of colleges and universities in China has been expanded for four consecutive years. 1080,000 students were enrolled in colleges and universities nationwide in 1998, reaching 2.75 million in 2002. In four years, the enrollment scale of colleges and universities has expanded by 65438+.

In particular, market competition is not only ubiquitous, but also inevitably fierce and cruel. An enterprise and a unit can survive and develop only if they win in the competition; On the other hand, failure in the competition will lead to bankruptcy.

The president of Qingdao Jianchenghao Wood Industry Co., Ltd. said that our leading products include nearly 100 specifications such as sander and painting line. Sales network all over the country, exported to domestic and foreign countries and Southeast Asia. Our products have passed the ISO900 1:2000: 2000 international quality system certification. A strong sense of market competition keeps us at the forefront of leading technology, and competition is the source of our motivation.

Since China joined the WTO in 2002, domestic competition has become more intense. The telecommunications and financial industries are the first to be affected. China's entry into WTO has a great influence on China Telecom. Without competition, the telecommunications industry will face difficulties, while competition will improve service quality, change operating mechanism and reduce operating costs. Under the impact of the international telecommunications industry, we must compete if we want to survive. Qin Chijiang, a financial expert of the People's Bank of China, believes that after joining the WTO, international financial institutions will enter the China market, and China's financial industry will face greater pressure than before, and competition is inevitable. The further opening of medical service market will bring new opportunities and challenges to the reform and development of health field. Competition has become a new topic in the medical industry, and only competition can adapt to the development of social trends.

"Natural selection, survival of the fittest" indicates that competition can lead to the survival of the strong and even the continuous progress and development of society.

Right around us, the media competition is becoming more and more fierce, such as radio war, newspaper war, periodical war, cross-regional competition and cross-media competition. ...

The live broadcast of China's> program is full of passion and fierce competition. Every link has to undergo strict screening, and there is a competitive atmosphere from the sea election to the final victory.

From June 65438+1October 14 to June 2 1 this year, the "two sessions" held in Beijing became the battlefields of various media news. If you want to stand out from the crowd, you must dedicate a wonderful "news feast" for readers. Every media wants to get the biggest ratings, and competition is inevitable.

In NBA, competition is the only way to choose a team. What do players do when they are exhausted? They just want to compete with their opponents to win or lose. There will be many events in the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China, but these trophies are not won through competition.

In order to cooperate with the smooth progress of the Olympic Games, BOCOG * * openly recruits 180 positions at home and abroad. After the qualification examination, 3,307 people took the exam, including graduate students or above 1.368, accounting for 4 1.4%, and 863 people with overseas study experience, accounting for 26.6563. 3062 people under the age of 35, accounting for 92.6%; Candidates from Beijing 1768, accounting for 53.5%, and candidates from other regions 1539, accounting for 46.5%. The relevant person in charge of BOCOG said that 3,307 people are vying for the position of 1.80, and the competition between them is inevitable and fierce. Only competition is the ultimate solution, and only competition can tap talents.

The replacement of dynasties and cultures in China is the product of class struggle. Class struggle is to produce a strong class through competition. This prosperous and powerful class has the ability to change the status quo and promote cultural progress. Qin unified the six countries through the struggle between countries. Later, economically, unified measurement established communication channels. Culturally, unified writing. Through competition, a powerful country gained power, promoted social progress and cultural development, and accelerated the pace of China's historical progress. It is also through class competition that the China * * * production party overthrew the three mountains and overthrew the feudal system, and the people of China ushered in a happy life now.

The level of science and technology is the expression of a country's comprehensive national strength. The key to the modernization of a country is the modernization of science and technology. Science and technology competition has also become the focus of competition among countries. 1964+ 1616 On October 6th, the first atomic bomb developed by China was successfully exploded in Lop Nur, Xinjiang. This is the fruit of China's determination to compete with other countries. On this basis, China has successfully developed and launched more than 40 satellites, following the United States, Russia and Japan, becoming a world science and technology power. Even now, countries are quietly competing in all aspects. The competition of science and technology makes scientific research develop rapidly. Economic competition makes the economies of all countries improve rapidly.

From the above examples, we can deeply understand the important position of competition in our lives. When we say that social competition is more than cooperation, it does not mean that cooperation does not exist. There is also cooperation in our society, but it is only a small-scale cooperation and a large-scale competition, and competition will always exceed cooperation. If cooperation trumps competition, I will follow suit. Society will not develop and mankind will not progress. Without competition, there will be no flourishing age in which a hundred schools of thought contend and a hundred flowers blossom.

Competition promotes social development and human progress. So I think it is inevitable that competition is greater than cooperation in modern society.

A record of the debate about which can make civilization progress better, cooperation or competition.

The host said: Now I introduce the debate: Wu Ying; Argument 2: Shen Tao; 3 Debate: Wang Qian; Argument 4: Li Ding; Argument against 1: Zhu Xiaoman; Opposing Party 2 Debate: Jiang Yuekai; Argument 3: Wang Lina; Argument 4: Zhang.

Today, our debate is: cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition. The argument of the opposing side is that competition can make civilization progress more than cooperation.

The host said to everyone: Now the debate begins. First of all, students who actively debate will state their views.

Start the debate stage:

Founder 1 Debate Competition says: Hello, judges, guests and other debaters!

Our Chinese textbook says that "modern society is a society full of competition, but it is also a society that needs cooperation more." As a modern person, only by learning to cooperate with others can we achieve greater success. " Competition and cooperation are two forces that constitute the survival and development of life and society. There is competition and cooperation in social life.

Two heads are better than one. Many people are smart. As long as you are good at cooperation and give full play to the strength of cooperation and the whole, you can find a way to succeed. Successful people are good at cooperation, because no one can be a lonely bird. There is a popular saying in Japan: One China can beat one Japanese, but three China people can't beat three Japanese. Although this means that China people are capable of individual competition and success, they are not good at collective cooperation. Take the national men's volleyball team, men's basketball team and men's football team as examples: in terms of height, we are much higher than Japanese and Korean players; In training time, we are also above them. Why do we often lose to Japan and South Korea in some key competitions? One of the important reasons is that they have played a cooperative spirit, at least better than us. Visible, no matter what you do, people who are good at cooperation, with the joint efforts of Qi Xin of both sides, can achieve success.

However, competition also has many problems, which can easily lead to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships and make people more selfish and narrow-minded. It also makes many people feel stressed, at a loss, and even produces serious psychological obstacles. Therefore, we believe that cooperation is more important than competition and can make civilization progress. thank you

The host said to everyone: Thank you for the debate. Next, please make your position clear. Go ahead.

The opponent's 1 argument says to everyone: Hello debaters!

Modern society, due to competition and continuous progress! More energetic because of competition! We believe that competition in modern society can make civilization progress more than cooperation. The development competition that you chase after me can make backwardness become advanced, and the society will follow this eternal competition law and move towards modernity and the future. For individuals, the premise of competition is that everyone has the opportunity to participate in the competition, and the result must be the survival of the fittest, ensuring social fairness; The process of competition is to do our best, which in turn stimulates the enthusiasm of individuals. In this era of calling for the strong, competition is not only the requirement of the times, but also a challenge to human nature. Let's face this era of competition!

Opponents, aren't you here to compete with us today? If we follow your logic, wouldn't it be meaningless for us to debate here today? Today's debate is a competition, which can win or lose and promote progress. thank you

The host said to everyone: thank you for arguing with the opposing students. The presentation stage of the competition has ended.

Debate about which can make civilization progress better, cooperation or competition.

Second, the offensive and defensive stage:

The host said to everyone: Next, we will enter the second stage-the attack and debate stage. First of all, let the students in the debate add their own views.

The debate says to you: Judges, opponents and friends: Hello everyone!

Dr. Sun Yat-sen said: "Species take competition as the principle, and human beings take cooperation as the principle. If human beings follow this principle, they will prosper; if they don't, they will perish. " It can be seen how important cooperation is.

There is a popular saying in the north and south of the Yangtze River: Everyone paddles and drives a big boat. You won't forget the 1998 flood! Facts have proved that the victory of this special struggle requires the concerted efforts of all the officers and men fighting floods and Qi Xin, the people of all ethnic groups in China, in order to finally build a Great Wall against floods on the backbone of our nation.

We will never forget when SARS was raging in 2003. It is with the joint efforts of leaders at all levels of the central and local governments and people from all walks of life that we have won the final victory. So all this proves that "cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition".

Because of competition and indifference, you guard against me and I guard against you. On the surface, they are kind, but in their hearts, there are many phenomena. The other debater, isn't this all caused by "competition"

The host said to everyone: thank you for the two students who debated. Next, let's listen to how the students who oppose it refute it.

Opposing Party 2 defends everyone: Hello everyone!

The other side debated a small bridge, and the other side debated a lot, but neither the microwave nor the angry waves could wash away the small faults of the other debater. The other side argues that competition will make human beings more selfish and narrow-minded, and the vicious impact listed in the other side's second argument is not caused by competition, but by his own unhealthy psychology.

Our ancestors told us a long time ago that only competition can bring civilization and progress. Competition is conducive to social creation, discovery and selection of talents. As Lenin said: "Competition cultivates enterprise, perseverance and bold initiative in a wide range." Competition is the mother of social progress.

Let's enter a highly competitive society and become strong. Finally, I want to ask other debaters, do you mean that you are actually afraid of competition?

The host said to everyone: thank you for your classmates. Next, we invite each other's students to speak.

The third debate in the square said to everyone: hello, chairman, judges and other debaters!

The argument against it mentions that today's debate is a kind of competition, and the argument against it also mentions that competition causes unhealthy psychology. Another debater regards competition as the apple of his eye and a panacea, which is completely wrong. Can it be said that only competition can promote the development of social civilization? Excuse me, "it's none of your business, hang up" and "just accept and don't send"; It only emphasizes individual competition and does not care about the development and future of the country. "Where did civilization develop? So your view that competition is beneficial to the development of civilization is nonsense.

During the Three Kingdoms period, Sun Quan and Liu Bei joined forces against Cao Cao, which laid a solid foundation for the Three Kingdoms. Isn't the birth of Das Kapital the crystallization of the cooperation between Marx and Engels?

Everyone knows Michael Jordan of Chicago Bulls, and maybe many people are crazy about it. Jordan's success is inseparable from the cooperation and assistance of his teammates. Looking back on the past and looking forward to the future, we firmly believe that "cooperation can lead to civilization and progress"!

The host said to everyone: the content is wonderful and the expression is very good. Thank you, students of the Third Debate. Next, let's listen to how the students who oppose it refute it.

Counterparty 3 defends everyone: Hello, judges and debaters! Now, I will defend myself from three opposite angles.

Modern society requires quantity before use, and competition for posts. Competition is more conducive to a society ruled by law than cooperation, ensuring the orderly progress of competition. For example, you can't cooperate with your classmates in the college entrance examination, right? In sports competitions, you have to compete for the championship, right? In the process of talent selection, if there is no competition, it can only be "sad", and if there is competition, it is "not sticking to one pattern to drop talents"! Talents can be selected through competition. Can it be selected through cooperation?

Ask the other party to answer my question and the other party's two arguments directly. Please don't shy away from the question.

The host said to everyone: thank you for opposing the three theories.

Debate on which can make civilization progress better, cooperation or competition: Record 3.

Third, the stage of free debate:

The host said to everyone: after listening to the speeches of the representatives of both sides on "competition and cooperation", it is time for them to show their eloquence. Students in favor must speak first. Now the free debate begins!

Argument 4 tells everyone: () Behind every achievement and honor, isn't it the result of cooperation?

The fourth debate of the opposing side tells everyone that the third debate of the opposing side mentioned in the statement just now that Liu Bei and Sun Quan cooperated against Cao Cao. Their purpose is to strengthen their own strength and compete better. Doesn't this show that competition is more important than cooperation?

The opposing side 1 defends everyone: Can the opposing side, the United States and Britain and other countries cooperate to attack Iraq, also make civilization progress?

Argument 4 of the opposing side tells everyone that the opposing side argues that China's football team can't beat Japan and South Korea, not because we lack the sense of cooperation, but because we lack the sense of competition. Even if we have the highest technology and have no sense of competition and desire to win, we can't win anyway.

Argument 2 tells everyone that cooperation is the basis of competition, and competition is only a means at best. Doesn't this mean that cooperation is more important than competition?

The opposing side defended everyone: the game is winning or losing, isn't it also a winning or losing game? Why are you playing here? Isn't it also for competition?

The positive 1 debate tells everyone: isn't the competition between the two sides based on cooperation? Without such good cooperation, can you achieve such good results? This just shows that "cooperation can promote the progress of civilization"!

Argument 3 tells us that some enterprises are unprofitable or even closed down in order to compete. Isn't this the fault of competition?

Founder 1 thinks that many famous musicians at home and abroad can dominate the stage. Behind their success, aren't there many people working together and struggling together?

Founder 1 believes that a psychology professor at Harvard University in the United States listed "sincere cooperation with colleagues" as one of the nine elements of success, and "words and deeds are not gregarious and not good at cooperating with others" as the first of the nine elements of failure.

Positive argument 4 tells us: On the contrary, most families in China are only children now, and these "little emperors" and "little princesses" especially lack the sense of cooperation. Under such social conditions, what will our society look like if we focus on cultivating the spirit of competition instead of cooperation?

Argument 4 tells everyone: Kofi Annan, Secretary-General of the United Nations, said, "No matter what career you choose in the future, you must learn to get along with people." This is a summary of the Secretary-General's 40 years of diplomatic experience.

Argument 3 of the opposing side tells everyone that the sense of competition is an indispensable condition for the growth of talents, and there is fierce competition between further education and business. Then, the selection of cadres in the middle class is also a kind of competition. Isn't swimming against the current a competition?

The opposing party argues to everyone that modern society requires quantity use and job competition. May I ask the opponent, is competition more important than cooperation? Can't work together?

There is a fable that both monkeys and elephants want to eat the fruit from the other tree. Monkeys can't cross rivers and elephants can't climb trees. After consultation between the two sides, the elephant crossed the river with the monkey on his back, and the monkey climbed the tree to pick the fruit. They all ate fruit. This is the advantage of learning from each other's strengths and working closely together.

Opponent 2 believes that if we continue to cooperate and have no innovative spirit, then mankind will only stagnate. If competition is not so important, what are we arguing about here today?

Both sides believe that competition is to stimulate people's enthusiasm, but can one person achieve the goal alone?

1, the opposing side, demonstrate to everyone: Can evil gangs in society cooperate to bully the weak and fear the hard, do all kinds of evil, and make civilization progress? The Iraqi people suffered from the war disaster brought by the United States. Is it necessary for Iraqi people to cooperate with the United States?

We have learned a story: ants met a fire on their way forward, and many ants quickly huddled and rolled away from the fire. Imagine, if everyone is fighting for survival, if there is no team spirit, it is strange that the small ant family is not completely annihilated!

Opposing Party 2 defends everyone: Excuse me, your opponent, are you cooperating or competing in the exam? If you are cooperating, it is cheating!

The opposing side 1 defends everyone: Isn't it a kind of competition for other countries to participate in the Olympic Games? Do players from all countries also cooperate to divide the gold medals equally?

Argument 4 says to everyone: excuse me, another debater, is it a mistake for the teacher to ask us to study together as much as possible in class?

The opposing side 1 thinks that international competition is becoming more and more complicated. On the opposing side, what keeps the market alive? Obviously, competition is more conducive to civilization and progress than cooperation, and more conducive to the metabolism and overall progress of society.

Argument 3 tells everyone: If athletes from all countries don't cooperate with each other, can the Olympic Games be successful?

(to the front) the opposing side argued for everyone: the opposing side argued four times. Isn't today's cooperative learning just for stepping into the society and participating in the competition better?

Argument 2 tells everyone that people who are not good at cooperation will find others difficult to get along with wherever they go. People who are good at cooperation will get along well with anyone they meet.

Argument 1 Refutation Argument 4: The United Nations "2 1 Century International Education Commission" put forward the "four pillars of education" to guide personnel training. The so-called "four pillars" refers to learning to recognize, learn to do things, learn to cooperate and learn to survive.

The host said to everyone: Sorry, please pause. Because of time, you can't enjoy yourself.

Debate about which can make civilization progress better, cooperation or competition.

End stage:

The host said to everyone: after a wonderful and fierce free debate, now please ask the opposing students to sum up their speeches.

The opposing party 4 argued to everyone:

The other side thinks that cooperation is more important than competition in modern society, which is exaggerated. We have no eternal enemies, but we have eternal national and ethnic interests. In order to safeguard our interests, only competition is the most effective way. The coexistence of greatness and frustration just shows that competition has richer connotation and more charming charm than cooperation.

Finally, I want to emphasize once again that competition in modern society can make civilization progress more than cooperation:

First, competition is the fundamental driving force for the development of modern society.

Second, competition can ensure a society in which efficiency and fairness take precedence. Promote the fair use of rights through political competition; Debate the truth, goodness and beauty of human spirit through cultural competitions and so on.

The debate is coming to an end The competition tested our knowledge and wisdom, and let us fight for honor and dreams. Therefore, let's say sincerely: Thank you for this great competitive era!

The host said to opponent 4: Thank you, opponent 4 debater. Finally, we asked the other four debaters to sum up their speeches for five minutes.

Argument 4 says to you: Judges and friends!

Just now, the other side's 1 debate repeatedly emphasized the importance of competition, but we should ask the other side's defense friends to clearly realize that there is a lot of cooperation in the process of competition itself, and competition is to promote better cooperation, but there are still many problems in competition, such as competition makes people narrow-minded and selfish, which easily leads to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships.

In reality, the fierce competition makes many people feel great pressure, at a loss, and even have serious psychological obstacles. How can these show that competition has promoted the progress of civilization? Only cooperation can promote the progress of civilization.

First of all, cooperation can promote people's better survival. Society is becoming more and more complicated. Only by working together can we tide over the difficulties.

Secondly, cooperation cultivates talents who are more suitable for the development of modern society than competition. Cultivate good psychological morality such as caring for others, unity and friendship.

Third, cooperation is more conducive to promoting the development of science than competition. Isn't the successful development of China's "Shenzhou 5" spacecraft the result of the cooperation of many scientific researchers?

Fourth, cooperation can promote social stability more than competition. The success in fighting floods, SARS and bird flu is the best example.

Let's join hands to create a more civilized future!