Reveal the most commonly used interview language trap of HR

Reveal the most commonly used interview language trap of HR

Reveal the most commonly used interview language trap of HR. Interview is a clever game between job seekers and recruiters. If an interviewer wants to deal with recruiters easily, he needs to pay attention to the language trap of the interviewer. Let's share the most commonly used interview language traps that reveal HR!

Reveal the most commonly used interview language traps of HR: 1 1 and "challenging" trap.

Interviewers who use this technique often use their own aura and eyes to crush each other's self-confidence before asking questions, so that their psychological defense line will retreat step by step, and then let them "lose their wisdom" with an "unfriendly" question, so as to examine each other's reaction and adaptability. Many people fail in the interview because they can't get through the difficulties well.

Job seekers' mistakes: hesitation, silence, anger, pushing through the crowd, blushing and thick neck.

The correct way: when answering the interviewer's words, we should first stabilize our mentality and avoid the interviewer's arrogance with humorous and clever answers. For example, the interviewer asked, "We need graduates from famous universities, and you didn't graduate from famous universities." You can answer: "I heard that Bill Gates didn't graduate from Harvard University either." Secondly, when answering questions, we must pay attention to the use of expressions, eyes and tone-smiling and looking directly at each other's eyes, and answering each other's words in a natural tone is the best choice. Never let the other person think that you are finding fault, otherwise your image in the interviewer's mind will be greatly discounted and counterproductive.

2. "Fight" trap

Asking questions from the weakest center of job seekers, such as education, education, experience, etc., can easily disturb the position of job seekers.

Wrong performance of job seekers:

1. About the fresh graduates, the interviewer will ask something like "You have less relevant work experience. What do you think? " problem If you only give a simple answer: "not true", "I think it must be" or "not all", then maybe you have fallen into the trap.

2. The interviewer asks you some embarrassing questions, such as "Your study is not excellent, are you qualified for our work?" Some job seekers tend to put on a defensive posture involuntarily, and even hit back at each other hard.

The correct way: never directly deny the problem of "fighting style" and don't rush to fight back. I can try to end with "this statement must be no problem", "this opinion is debatable" and "this statement has some truth, but I'm afraid I can't bear it at all", and then express my different opinions euphemistically. When answering, you need to pay attention to: don't hide or escape the facts, and don't come straight to the point, but skillfully bypass them by talking about the advantages of defects and facts.

3, "induced" trap

Interviewers often set specific background conditions to induce the other party to make wrong answers.

Wrong performance of job seekers: for example, the interviewer asked, "At your current level, it should not be difficult to find a better company?" If you give a positive answer, then clarify that you are "treading on two boats". If you give a negative answer, then clarify that you lack confidence or talent.

The correct way: For this "trap", you can start with "Don't confuse things with one another" and then reply: "Maybe I can find a better company than your company, but other companies may not pay as much attention to talent training as your company, and the opportunities are not as good as yours; Maybe I can find a better company, but I think it is most important to cherish every opportunity to experience myself. " In this way, "deal with a man as he deals with you."

4, "test" trap

The interviewer will imagine a situation, then ask the job seeker to answer it and examine the adaptability of the job seeker.

Wrong performance of job seekers: For example, the interviewer asked, "There are nearly 10 candidates who participated in the interview today. How do you prove that you are the best? " If I list my advantages blindly, there will always be job seekers who have advantages that you don't have. Such an answer is meaningless.

The correct way: when asked such questions, you can bypass them from the front and answer them from the side. For example, you can answer "It may depend on the details. For example, what your company needs now is administrative talents. Although all the recruits are talents in this field, I firmly believe that my experience in working abroad has laid a solid foundation for me, which I think is more prominent. " Such a reply can be said to be more sophisticated, and it is difficult for the other party to seize the evidence and fight back again.

5. The trap of "leading the king into the urn"

This kind of trap is the most difficult and risky. The interviewer will ask you a seemingly ordinary question and let you express your opinion. But when you indulge yourself, you have fallen into the trap set by the interviewer.

Wrong performance of job seekers: suppose you are about to jump from one company to another. The interviewer asks you, "Is your boss difficult to get along with? Why else did you quit? " Maybe his guess is the reason why you want to jump ship. If you scold your boss with resentment, or accuse your company with indignation, then you must be finished, because this not only exposes your intolerance, but also exposes your narrowness.

The correct way: remember not to be confused by the interviewer's questions and tone, and don't get on the pole. You can give me a few+-seconds to find out what the interviewer really wants to know before giving the correct answer. Try not to involve my personal feelings, but discuss the facts objectively, by the way, show the interviewer my attitude and decision about my future development, and shift the topic to my advantage.

Job seekers should deal with all kinds of speech traps set by HR and master some interview skills when answering HR questions in the interview.

(1) Get to the point, be concise, clear and well-founded.

In general, you should draw a conclusion first, then discuss it, first express your central idea clearly, and then make a narrative and argument. Otherwise, a long speech will make people accomplish nothing. The interview time is limited. Too many superfluous words are easy to digress, but will dilute or miss the topic. This is especially important when introducing yourself in an interview.

(2) Explain the whole story and avoid abstraction.

Employers always want to know the specific situation of some candidates when asking questions, and must not simply answer with "yes" and "no". Depending on the questions raised, some need to explain the reasons and some need to explain the degree. Answers that are too abstract and don't tell the whole story often don't leave a concrete impression on the examiner.

(3) Confirm the content of the question and avoid answering irrelevant questions.

In the interview, if the questions put forward by the employer are out of touch for a while, so that you don't know where to answer or it is difficult to understand the meaning of the other party's questions, you can repeat the questions, first talk about your understanding of this question, and then ask the other party to confirm the content. Unclear questions must be made clear, so as to be targeted and not answer irrelevant questions.

(4) Have personal opinions and characteristics.

Employers sometimes receive several applicants, ask the same question several times and listen to similar answers several times. Therefore, employers will find it boring. Only an answer with unique personal opinions and characteristics will arouse the interest and attention of the other party!

Uncover the most commonly used interview language trap of HR 2 1, which is covered by "provocation"

This is a common way for interviewers to eliminate most candidates. Interviewers who use this technique often stare at each other with suspicious, sharp and aggressive eyes before asking questions, shilling each other's psychological defense line step by step, and then suddenly provoke each other with an obviously unfriendly question.

For example, "Your experience is too simple, but we need experienced people", "Your introverted personality is probably not suitable for our major", "We need graduates from famous universities, but you didn't graduate from famous universities" and "Why doesn't your major match the position you are applying for?"

In the face of such aggressive questioning, as an applicant, the first thing to do is not to be "provoked" anyway. If you are angered, then you have lost. So, in the face of such a problem, how to bring it?

If the other person says, "Your experience is too simple, but what we need is someone with rich social experience."

You can answer with a smile: "I am sure that if I join your company by accident, I will soon become an experienced person in society." I wish I had this experience. "

If the other person says, "You are too introverted, you are probably not suitable for our profession."

You can answer with a smile: "It is said that introverts often have the qualities of dedication and persistence, and I am good at listening, because I think we should leave more opportunities to speak to others."

If the other party says, "We need graduates from famous universities, you didn't graduate from famous universities."

You can say humorously, "I heard that Bill Gates didn't graduate from Harvard University either."

If the other person says, "Why doesn't your major match the position you are applying for?"

You can answer skillfully: "It is said that the most sought-after talents in the 2 1 century are compound talents, and the inspiration of laymen may exceed that of experts because they have no fixed thinking and rules."

2. Challenge the language trap

This kind of problem is characterized by starting from the weakest place of job seekers.

For fresh graduates, the interviewer will ask, "Your relevant work experience is relatively lacking. What do you think? " For female college students, the interviewer may ask: "Women often lack confidence in their abilities. What do you think? "

If your answer is "not necessarily", "I don't think so" or "not at all", then maybe you have fallen into the trap, because the other person wants to hear your opinion on this issue, not a simple and blunt rebuttal.

For such a question, you can use "this statement is not necessarily all right", "this view is worth exploring" and "this statement has some truth, but I'm afraid I can't accept it completely" as the opening remarks, and then express your different opinions diplomatically.

Sometimes the interviewer will ask questions that embarrass the job seeker. For example, "your academic performance is not very good." What's wrong? " "Judging from your resume, you didn't have any experience as a student cadre during your college years, will this affect your work ability" and so on.

When confronted with such problems, some job seekers often put on a defensive posture involuntarily, and even severely hit back at each other. Doing so will only fall into the trap of overconfidence, leading to "arrogant" evaluation. The best way to answer this question is not to hide and avoid it, nor to be too straightforward, but to talk about shortcomings, discuss advantages and skillfully bypass it.

For example, when the other party says that your academic performance is not very good, you can admit it frankly, and then bring out your other advantages by analyzing the reasons. For example, I didn't do well in school because I was the head of the club and put too much energy into the club activities. Although my hard work in the club has also brought me a lot of gains, my academic performance is not the best, which has been bothering me. When I realized this, I have been trying to correct my deviation.

3. Induce language traps

The characteristic of this kind of questions is that the interviewer often sets specific background conditions to induce the other party to make wrong answers, because perhaps none of the answers can satisfy the other party. At this time, your answer needs to be expressed in vague language.

For example, "at your current level, I'm afraid you can find a better company than us?"

If your answer is "yes", then you may be in two boats, "in Cao Cao's heart, in Han." If you answer "no", it means that you lack confidence in yourself, or there is something wrong with your ability.

For such questions, we can start with "we can't generalize" and then answer: "Maybe I can find a better company than yours, but other companies may not attach as much importance to talent training as your company and have as many opportunities as your company; Maybe I can find a better company, and I think it is most important to cherish what I have. "

In this way, you are actually throwing a "vague" answer back to the interviewer.

Another induced language trap is that the other person's question seems to be a multiple-choice question, and you fall into the trap when you choose it. For example, the other person asks, "Which do you think is more important, money, fame or career?"

Of course, for college students who have just graduated, all three are very important. But the other person's question is misleading you, making you feel that "the three are contradictory and you can only choose one." At this time, you must not fall into the trap of the other party, and you must calmly analyze it. We can clearly point out that this premise does not exist first, and then explain to us the importance and unity of the three.

You can organize the language like this, "I don't think the three are contradictory." As a college student with higher education, the pursuit of career success is of course the main theme of his life. The way society affirms our cause is sometimes manifested in money, sometimes in reputation, and sometimes both. Therefore, I think we should get money and fame in the process of pursuing our career, which are very important to us. "

4. Exam-oriented language trap

The characteristic of this kind of question is to make up a situation first and then let the job seeker answer it. For example, "the candidates who participated in the interview today are nearly 10. How do you prove that you are the best? " This kind of question is often to examine the ability of job seekers to improvise. No matter how many advantages you give yourself, others always have advantages that you may not have. It is meaningless to answer this question directly. You can go around the front and answer this question from the side.

You can answer: "for this, it may depend on the specific situation." For example, what your company needs now is administrative talents. Although all the candidates are peers in this field, I am convinced that my experience as a student cadre and presiding over community work during my college years has laid a solid foundation for me, which I think is more prominent. " Such an answer can be said to be smooth sailing, and it is difficult for the other party to seize the handle and fight back again.

Sometimes, the interviewer will ask such a question: "Do you like or hate trivial work? Why?"

This is a dilemma. If you like it, it seems to violate the actual psychology of educated youth. If you hate it, it seems that every job has trivial things. Therefore, according to general psychology, people are unwilling to do trivial work (except for special posts, such as domestic hourly workers), that is, the examiner knows perfectly well past ask, and we can infer that drunkenness lies not in wine, but in "work attitude".

We can express our attitude by saying, "In most jobs, trivial things are inevitable. If there are trivial things to do at work, I will do them seriously, patiently and meticulously. "

This sentence not only euphemistically expresses the general psychology of most people-they don't like trivial work, but also emphasizes their persistence in trivial things-seriousness, patience and meticulousness. Both authentic and in line with each other's employment psychology.

Among all kinds of language traps, the most difficult and dangerous one may be the one that leads a gentleman into an urn. During the interview, the interviewer may design various language traps, but as long as the goal is right, the enemy will block it and the water will cover it.