Do you think job recruitment mainly depends on ability or personality?

It is difficult to answer just by looking at this title, and the best answer is usually moderate. For example, people with talent and no virtue, people without talent and no virtue, should indeed recruit some and withdraw some, but the result is obviously not perfect.

In fact, if a team wants to grow, both virtue without talent and virtue with talent are exerting an alternative influence. The growth of the team needs every member of the team to continuously narrow his upper hand, that is, talented people narrow their talents and virtuous people narrow their morality, so as to ensure the upper hand and competitiveness of the team. If you just focus on the shortcomings and shortcomings of employees, then such a team will eventually get tired of shortcomings.

So, back to the topic itself, whether the boss wants to recruit new employees or may want to lay off employees, instead of obsessing about recruiting people or abolishing unethical talents, it is better to think about how to make talented people more talented and ethical people more ethical in the process of team growth, and then create conditions to provide them with a platform to display their respective strengths and make more contributions to the team.

However, if I were my own boss, I think I would hire two-thirds of talented people without morality, and only one-third of those without talent and morality. Why? Because the team has to grow, everyone has to eat, and without talent, you can't live alone. However, it is better to deal with people who are actually very talented, but their moral qualities are surprisingly poor, and it is better to go there.

Therefore, it can be seen that the ideal talent is still strong, and the moral character is only good or at most abnormal, so such employees will be trusted everywhere and will naturally grow well.