Why do employers require unmarried employees to recruit?

When competing for positions in the workplace, some employers will require job seekers to be single, and if they are married, they will be rejected. This phenomenon is obviously unreasonable. This is because both singles and married people have the same right to apply for jobs, and married people are fully capable of completing their own tasks. It is illegal to refuse married job seekers. 1, regardless of whether they are married or unmarried, they have the same right to apply for jobs. From the point of view of job competition, both married and unmarried people have the same job competition. No one and no regulations require job seekers to be single, and no one and no regulations exclude married people from job hunting. ..... So it is unreasonable for the work unit to only need single job seekers when applying for a job. 2, as long as they have the corresponding working ability, married people can still be competent for their own work tasks. In the workplace, the core content of job competition is the level of professional skills. As long as you have the corresponding level of professional skills, you can be competent for the task, you can pass the job evaluation and successfully pass the interview. ..... There is no question of being married or unmarried, so it is unreasonable for the work unit to treat job seekers differently on the grounds of being married or not. Rejecting married job seekers is not only unreasonable, but also illegal. It is not only unreasonable but also illegal for the work unit to refuse married job seekers as long as they are single. ..... On the one hand, it is not stipulated that married job seekers can't compete for jobs, and on the other hand, married people have relevant protection measures when they are pregnant and have children. Therefore, it is completely wrong for the work unit to reject married job seekers. Relevant units must correct such mistakes and give married job seekers equal job opportunities.