The school restricts the admission of the first degree, but doesn't it agree with three and three?

Of course not. Although a bachelor's degree is important, personal ability is more important.

About the first degree, it has always been a hot topic of discussion. In fact, it is a topic worthy of further discussion. The common contradiction between undergraduate schools and graduate schools is different employment treatment.

To put it another way, you have two undergraduate courses and 985 graduate students, but the employer needs a first degree. Should I be admitted? It's really hard to remember.

In fact, there is a reason, because it is more difficult to get into 985 in the college entrance examination than to get into graduate school, so the gold content of undergraduate schools is higher, and everyone usually thinks so.

First of all, you can look at the explanation given by Baidu Encyclopedia:

The distinction between the first degree and the second degree is originally the product of the planned economy era. Under the background of planned economy, the superiors of ordinary primary schools, ordinary junior high schools, ordinary senior high schools and ordinary institutions of higher learning (including ordinary secondary specialized schools) are the first education bureaus of the original provinces and cities, and the academic qualifications issued upon graduation are issued by the first education bureau, so they are called the first academic qualifications; Other forms of continuing education, such as adult high schools, higher education self-study exams, adult colleges and universities, adult secondary schools, etc. , by the second education bureau of provinces and cities. The degree awarded and the degree obtained by ordinary full-time students studying the second major at the same time are called the second degree. The first education and the second education are two kinds of education at the same level.

Discrimination against the first degree refers to the unscientific evaluation and unreasonable screening of candidates by employers based on the so-called first degree obtained by candidates many years ago, rather than on their abilities and job requirements. [9]

In the sixties and seventies, family background was like a political yoke, which bound many young people. In recent years, new shackles have emerged, requiring? Original education? What it must be. If your first degree is low, even if you study later, you are very proficient in your major, but as long as? Level one? If you can't meet the requirements, you can't talk about it. This is not? Family background? Is this chain a copy of today?

There are many problems in the education system, institutions of higher learning and students themselves, which lead to? Level one? The complex still exists.

? Sorry, we only look at the first degree. It's no use upgrading your education.

The first degree represents the gap with others in the college entrance examination and reflects our previous learning ability and efforts; The second degree represents our recent learning status and ability to re-learn, so there is no saying that academic upgrading is useful or useless.

But in my opinion, the state will always come forward to reduce this discrimination! Everyone's efforts to improve will eventually pay off!