Job Recruitment Website - Job seeking and recruitment - Fire prevention inspection was carried out in an electrolytic salt plant, and the inspection results were as follows, among which () did not meet the requirements of the specification.

Fire prevention inspection was carried out in an electrolytic salt plant, and the inspection results were as follows, among which () did not meet the requirements of the specification.

Answer: a, c, d, e

The fire hazard of electrolytic salt workshop belongs to Class A. According to Code for Fire Protection Design of Buildings (GB 50016-2014 (version 2018) 3.6. 1, Class A and Class B workshops with explosion hazard should be set up independently and should be open or semi-open. Its load-bearing structure should adopt reinforced concrete or steel frame bent structure, and option A is wrong; According to 3.6.8, the general control room of Class A and Class B workshops with explosion danger should be set independently, and option B is correct; According to 3.6. 10, the stairwell, outdoor staircase in the explosion danger area or the joint between the explosion danger area and the adjacent area shall be provided with protective measures such as door hoppers. The partition wall of the door hopper should be a fireproof partition wall with a fire resistance limit of not less than 2.00 h, and the door should be a Class A fireproof door, and should be set in the wrong position with the stairwell door. Option c is wrong; According to 9. 1.2, the air in Class A and Class B factories should not be recycled, and the D option is wrong; According to 3.3. 1 Note 1, the fire partition of Class A workshop should be separated by firewall, and the E option is wrong. The answer to this question is ACDE.