Murder case in Liquan County, Shaanxi Province

On April 28th, Xianyang Intermediate People's Court conducted the first trial of the murder case of Liquan Xintiandi Internet Cafe on September 20th last year, with the following doubts:

1. The prosecutor said that Wang Tiedan and the first witness had a dispute when they seized the seat. When they were fighting, Wang Tiedan hurt people with a knife. The testimony of the first witness was that Wang Tiedan slapped his thigh and had an argument after waking up. When the victim saw that his girlfriend was harassed and prepared to protect her frame, Wang Tiedan gave the victim a knife, and then he gave a knife to the person who came to stop the fight. When they saw two people on the ground, they ran away. Is this an argument over a seat? The first witness and the victim at the scene are employees of Xintiandi, that is, the helpers mentioned in the indictment. Who did Wang Tiedan grab the seat with? Internet cafe staff? ! The victims are the staff of Internet cafes, who are responsible for maintaining public order and the personal and property safety of all Internet cafes, that is, some excessive acts are also cracking down on the hooliganism of criminals.

2. According to the indictment, Wang Tiedan's killing tool was identified as a fruit knife through blood identification and DNA identification. When the court showed it, it seemed that there was only a plastic handle knife of 10 cm. Excuse me, Mr. Prosecutor, with such a small fruit knife, will the victim be stabbed by the murderer from the abdomen and bleed to death? Ordinary people are not allowed to drive around!

3. Wang Tiedan was vague about the judge's defense during the trial, and the criminal facts he provided were completely inconsistent with the confession when he was arrested. I forgot for a while, I couldn't tell for a while, and then I said that my eyes were hurt and I couldn't see. I stabbed the victim and the seriously injured with a knife. The IQ is too high for an illiterate person, and the anti-interrogation method is too clever.

4. According to the indictment, Wang Tiedan's murder case is a case of intentional injury. After the plaintiff's lawyer issued several testimonies to prove that the case was intentional homicide, the prosecutor asked the court to decide whether it was homicide. As a national law enforcement agency, can't we judge the nature of the case in front of many facts? Is there any difference between the evidence presented by public security organs in court and the evidence presented to procuratorial organs? I don't know who is cheating. You should have some conscience in front of the victims, your honor.