Job Recruitment Website - Job seeking and recruitment - Is it difficult to interview a court assistant police officer?

Is it difficult to interview a court assistant police officer?

The interview tests your adaptability and communication skills. Because the demand for the position is relatively large, it is not particularly difficult to take the exam

The establishment of assistant police requires an exam. The written test is the "Administrative Professional Aptitude Test", and the interview tests the ability to adapt to changes in circumstances and communication. Because the demand for the position is relatively large, it is not particularly difficult to pass the exam.

Positioning of the assisting police:

1. The assisting police is positioned as an "auxiliary" police force. It is a professional group prevention and treatment team and does not have administrative law enforcement power.

2. In terms of institutional nature, although the cooperative police team is a financial subsidy institution, it is not a first-level authorized joint defense team. The assisting police must carry out various tasks under the leadership of the existing civilian police. Auxiliary police officers are generally traffic police squadrons who assist traffic police in managing traffic order.

Although the assisting police do not have legal qualifications in law, the assisting police are a powerful supplement to the public security team. Their main task is to participate in patrols and patrols under the unified organization of the public security organs and the leadership of grassroots police. Conduct safety inspections and assist public security agencies in strengthening public security.

Therefore, when the cooperating police discover violations of laws and regulations and make preliminary confirmations, the public should regard them as an extension of the police's law enforcement work, respect and actively cooperate with the cooperating police work.

When the actions of the police officers clearly exceed the scope of their duties, the public certainly has the right to question, but such questions should also be raised through normal channels and in a legal way. They cannot object for the sake of opposition. Let alone resort to violence.