Huawei's list of talented teenagers was ridiculed: it felt ordinary and a little grandstanding.

Earlier, Ren announced that Huawei would recruit talented teenagers in the future and attract talents through super high salary. Soon, the internal human resources department of Huawei took action and began to look for talented teenagers. Recently, Huawei has just announced the first batch of talented teenagers, including 8 doctors. However, once the list was published, it caused an uproar in the society, and even Huawei employees had certain objections and unhappiness. It is reported that Huawei announced the second batch of talented teenagers, but it is different from the first batch. It did not publish its full name, but used a doctor instead. I guess I don't want to have such a hot discussion for the first time. But the truth of the news has yet to be confirmed.

Some netizens talked about Huawei's list of talented teenagers in the forum, and bluntly felt that the level was not so powerful, not worthy of such a high salary, and even a bit sensational. Its comment said: the one with the highest price, the article is very general, is a pile of second-and third-rate periodicals. I wonder if this can graduate in Tsinghua? Dr. Tsinghua, whose annual salary is 1 10,000, is an undergraduate of Northeast Normal University, which is an ordinary school, and his thesis is also very general. What is Huawei's selection criteria, or is it randomly selected in the rush to enroll students? Too casual.

Some netizens echoed in their posts: I think at least Tsinghua and Yao Ban are gifted teenagers. It is no problem to spend a lot of money on horse bones. Feeling at home must be unconvinced by the public. If I'm outside, I look great. However, from their level, no matter how good they are, they will not consider Huawei unless they offer a higher price. But there are several companies in it that are really water. How can everyone stand such a high-level enterprise? It's really grandstanding, and it doesn't mean anything to Huawei itself. It is better to dig the well-known technical bulls in the industry directly with high salary, and the effect is obvious!

However, some netizens think that the landlord's point of view is biased: the paper is one. Have you checked their project experience and output results? Top2, does anyone still hold thesis theory? Some time ago, Tsinghua, Peking University, canceled the hard condition of doctoral thesis graduation, right? Basically, they have all worked as interns in Huawei, and the output should be ideal.

I've seen a few, and I'm confused about the reasons for the recruitment, but I think Huawei's HR and executives should be smarter than me, so I'm going to see what they can do inside. We should only think that these people had deep cooperation with Huawei when they were in the laboratory or during Huawei's long-term internship, and produced a lot of things. Otherwise, if we only look at the level of papers, there are indeed a few people who can't convince the public.

It seems that Huawei's high-paying recruitment of fresh graduates has attracted a lot of attention. It stands to reason that Huawei has money and is willing to pay a high price to recruit doctors and spend its own money to recruit suitable talents. What right do others have to point fingers? As the following netizen commented: you are also interesting, then I will take office. I'll give you1100,000. Will you come? If you don't come, maybe you don't even know Huawei. As a result, someone goes, and you are not good at criticizing others. Huawei doesn't want to recruit the best? No, it's still a big shot like you who doesn't like people