Job Recruitment Website - Job seeking and recruitment - Netizens reported that part-time postgraduate recruitment was discriminated against. How to treat part-time graduate students?

Netizens reported that part-time postgraduate recruitment was discriminated against. How to treat part-time graduate students?

Netizens reflect that part-time graduate students are discriminated against, so we need to treat part-time graduate students more rationally. Part-time graduate students are also registered through the national unified examination, and the training process is guaranteed, which is more suitable for on-the-job personnel to apply. In other words, the two types of graduate students are parallel and equal to full-time graduate students, regardless of advantages and disadvantages, but the suitable groups are different.

As part-time graduate students are the product of the reform of postgraduate training mechanism, it is a pity that most enterprises (including HR) do not understand this policy, and many people equate part-time graduate students with former on-the-job graduate students (after all, most people in the workplace have worked for so many years and have no mind to care about what students care about). Under the premise of not knowing, decisions made because of cognitive bias can be called discrimination.

Secondly, I think it is reasonable that part of the recognition of the same school is not as good as that of full-time graduate students. After all, the documents of the Ministry of Education require all kinds of equality standards only in theory. In practice, some graduate students will inevitably be affected by some life. However, based on the fact that part-time graduate students are admitted by unified recruitment, the admission standard is only a little lower than that of full-time students in the same school, and the quality assurance in the training process is also relatively low, so it is also discrimination to classify part-time graduate students as poor and unacceptable. You can speak on strength, or you can give priority to full-time work under the same conditions, but it is unreasonable to directly exclude part-time work. As a pragmatic and profit-seeking business organization (especially a private enterprise), it is putting the cart before the horse to select talents through labels instead of seeking truth from facts.

Social recognition of part-time graduate students needs a process. I expect and think that part-time graduate students will get a fair evaluation. I'm not saying that full-time and part-time graduate students are exactly the same, but that they should be treated fairly and reasonably. At least at present, it is very unreasonable for some employers to kill them with a stick (especially in the case of social recruitment).