Interviewers ask you why you want to change your job, and how to answer skillfully.

When someone asks you why you want to change your job, how to answer skillfully

When someone asks you why you want to change your job, how to answer skillfully? People with strong interpersonal skills are also very happy in the workplace. No matter what you do, you should master the sense of proportion, and your personality will be revealed in the details. There are people outside you, so learn to interview others and ask you why you want to change your job, and how to answer skillfully. You are the only one who can be a professional!

How to answer skillfully when someone asks you why you want to change your job? 1

This answer is not only a specific answer, but also gives you a thinking framework and logic. No matter where you apply for a job and who the interviewer is, when the other person asks you this question, you can be very confident and self-confident, and you won't make mistakes in your direction. Let's listen to me slowly:

First of all, we have to find out a central question, that is, what is the essential reason behind changing jobs?

maybe you will say, "I changed my job because there is no room for development in the company."

The interviewer may ask, "Please tell me about it."

So you go on: "There is a narrow room for the promotion of the department, and there is no way to get promoted, and many aspects of the individual can't be brought into play ..."

This reason can't be said to be bad, but it's not the best. The most prominent problem is that it is easy to be superficial and difficult to get to the point, giving the interviewer the impression that you are not telling the truth. Let's put it another way:

You said, "I don't want to hide anything. I'm a very frank person. The reason I left my job was because they were unhappy.

The interviewer beckons you to continue, and you and Barra continue to say, "When an employee finishes his work, the leader can't fulfill his previous reward promise." This is obviously poisoned by Ma Yun's words:

"There are many reasons for employees leaving their jobs, two of which are the most real: (1) money is not given in place; (2) The heart, in the final analysis, is a pity: a bad mood. "

It can't be said that the answer to this question is insincere and untrue, but if you meet a narrow-minded interviewer, they may extrapolate and even cause some worry ...

What kind of answer is safe? Tell the truth? For example, "the company has just moved, it is too far from home, and it takes an hour and a half to go to work, so it has to resign." This seems sincere, but the interviewer thought to himself, "Our company will move soon. Have I caused you any trouble?"? Even if you don't move, you are afraid of being tired. How can you work ...?

The interviewer may not have reasonable concerns, but you must worry the interviewer that he will base himself on the "prudent principle of employment", or exclude you, or just treat you as a substitute, sometimes in between!

As a face-to-face HR, I found that when answering the question "Why did you change your job?", most of the answers were not very satisfactory, at least not perfect.

Based on my past observation and experience, I have summed it up, and all of them reflect a more or less prominent problem, which is even ignored by 9% of people, that is, the career development and planning behind this problem.

because most people understand that this problem is not deep, it is easy to fall into a fixed mode of thinking and set a premise, that is, "there must be something wrong when I leave, whether it is my problem or the company's problem." "

This is an obvious problem-oriented thinking development model. If we need to find reasons and always take the role of problem as the guide, then in our eyes, we will regard everything as a problem, not a learning opportunity. When you regard everything as a social problem, it's either your own problem, or it's bound to be blamed on the employees of the original company. Only this "alternative" makes you have no choice. Even if what you say is beautiful and reasonable, there may still be no distrust of the interviewer-the facts you identify are probably the students' own subjective imagination, which cannot be convincing.

It is the existence of problem-oriented thinking mode that leads to my career without planning: one step at a time. Your resignation and job search are passive, unbearable after resignation, no goal guidance, no positive plan ... these are obvious, so your so-called "reasons" are actually just rhetoric, with the aim of perfunctory interviewers.

didn't anyone answer: "I left my job because I thought I should go, because my expected goal has been achieved in my current company. According to the original plan, I have to change my job and start my career again, which is my need." Tell me why?

or, "I originally planned to quit my job at this time, but I just saw that your company's XX aspect attracted me, which is very in line with my career development ..." This reason is at least a lot more impressive and irrefutable for the interviewer.

To sum up, your thinking mode when answering questions must be changed from "question-oriented" to "goal/vision-oriented", and you should emphasize that it is out of your objective needs rather than being forced or passive, otherwise you will easily lead yourself into a ditch without knowing it.

For sensitive interviewers, it is also necessary to think about this and check whether the other person is a person with strong sense of purpose and strong initiative, otherwise asking this question will become a formality or an endless worry, which will lose the meaning of the question. Interviewers ask you why you want to change your job and how to answer it skillfully. 2

You should have a correct understanding of the problem of making mistakes in the interview.

There are no standard answers to most difficult questions in the interview, mainly to test your ability. As long as you clearly show your positive point of view, you can answer according to your own thinking and show your comprehensive quality and good ability. If you make some mistakes occasionally, the examiner will not completely deny you, so don't be nervous.

Secondly, we should quickly judge whether we can make up for it. When you answer wrong, you always want to find a chance to make up for it. You always want to explain why you didn't answer well just now to prove that you are not bad. However, because the following questions are one after another, candidates have to answer new questions on the one hand and think about the shortcomings of the previous questions on the other, and the new questions are not answered well as a result. Therefore, when you can't make up for it, you don't have to worry about it, but you should forget it immediately and continue to answer the following questions calmly.

thirdly, if you feel sure to make up for your mistakes, you should also pay attention to ways and means. Specifically, there are several skills to remedy interview mistakes:

1. Correct mistakes with correct ones.

when you realize your mistake, you should correct it honestly, and don't ignore it for the sake of saving face. The best way is to say it again in the correct way. Such as unreasonable sentences, unsatisfactory words, slip of the tongue, etc., as long as they are corrected naturally, they will be understood by the examiner.

second, make mistakes right.

If you realize that you have made a mistake, it is not a remedy if the candidates can explain their mistakes reasonably, as long as they can justify themselves. For example, the understanding of the phenomenon of college students selling pork as nannies, when answering, originally wanted to focus on the change of college students' employment concept, the change of employment environment, the increase of employment pressure and other issues, but when answering, they said it was a waste of talents, and they felt that they were wrong, so candidates didn't have to be nervous, so they focused on the waste of talents. Other views were taken as general discussions, and the effect was not bad.

third, mistakes are corrected.

when answering questions, if you make a mistake, you can sometimes remedy it by adjusting the meaning and changing the tone. As long as the response is quick and the strain is timely, you can receive the error correction effect without showing traces. For example, after listing a series of corruption phenomena, the examinee wants to say "we will never allow this phenomenon to exist" and ends up saying "we allow this phenomenon to exist".

at this time, if you directly admit that you are wrong and say the correct one again, the effect is not good. In this case, continuing to make mistakes is the best choice. Candidates can go on with "We allow this phenomenon to exist" and "It is a crime against the people". It is logical and seamless to continue the remedy in this way.

It is not easy to correct mistakes during a tense interview, which requires candidates to try not to make mistakes. If you don't make mistakes or make fewer mistakes, you must be prepared for the exam. The usual accumulation is indispensable, and it is also necessary to participate in intensive training before the exam. Under the guidance of experts, you can improve yourself in an all-round way, and you can make fewer mistakes in the interview. Even if you make mistakes, you can correct them in time and deal with them calmly. Interviewing someone asks you why you want to change your job and how to answer it skillfully. 3

Interview is an important way for employers to choose candidates, and the interview effect directly affects whether the candidates can be hired by the company. The most common way to interview is to ask questions. The interviewer will ask the candidate some questions one after another, which may be technical questions, or they may be asking about experience, or they have no obvious intention. It's no use trying to prepare these questions before the interview, because you have no idea what questions the interviewer will ask. During the interview, you don't need to be particularly nervous. In addition to actively answering the interviewer's questions, you should also actively create a good interview communication atmosphere. The following are some common questions that the author asks when organizing an interview, hoping to help the applicants.

1. Pay attention to the interviewer's questions about the application motivation. Sometimes, the interviewer will ask questions such as "Why did you choose our company?" When answering such questions, the applicant must think carefully before answering, and it is best to combine the management and development of the company to answer. If we simply attribute the reason to "high salary" or "close to home", it will inevitably affect the effect of the answer.

2. It's not surprising that the interviewer sometimes makes things difficult for the applicant. Especially for candidates applying for positions such as management or sales, this kind of difficulties may occur more often. The main purpose of making things difficult for candidates is to examine their reaction ability. If you encounter difficulties from the interviewer, you should calmly deal with them. For questions that are really difficult to answer, you can explain the reasons directly or deal with them in some humorous ways. If you are at a loss in the face of a difficult problem, it just shows that your emergency ability and reaction ability are poor.

3. How to face the current political problems Sometimes the interviewer will ask some current political questions to understand the applicant's knowledge in this respect. Maybe you don't know anything about the interviewer's question, and the candidate just needs to answer honestly "I don't know". Failure to pretend to understand will reduce the honesty of candidates. If the candidate expresses some unprincipled views on the current politics in an extreme way, it will make the candidate's interview go to waste. No company wants its employees to have political problems.

4. There is no standard answer for most answers. Except for very professional and technical questions, there is no standard answer for most questions. Candidates don't have to guess what the interviewer's standard answer is. The reason why you should ask questions in an interview is just because asking questions is the simplest and most intuitive way to understand the situation of candidates. The purpose of asking questions is to understand the applicant's situation, so it is not necessary for the applicant to just answer the questions. The applicant can give full play to the content of the question, so that the interviewer can fully understand one of your specialties.

5. The way of answering is more important than the result. Sometimes the way of answering is more important than the result of answering. Some of the interviewer's questions have no practical significance, just measuring some of your personality characteristics or quality characteristics. Generally speaking, an honest or astute answer can arouse the interviewer's interest in you.

Honesty is a valuable quality, and no company is willing to hire dishonest employees. In the interview, some candidates will intentionally conceal facts or fabricate lies when answering questions in order to leave a good impression on the interviewer, so as to make themselves look more perfect. This is not worth the loss, and the interviewer can easily see through these tricks. Sometimes, the interviewer just needs to ask a question to get to the bottom of it, and all your lies will be exposed.

6. Avoid too short answers. The purpose of the interviewer's questions to the applicant is to learn more about the applicant. If the applicant's answers are too short, it will hinder the interviewer's understanding of the applicant. Generally, there is no standard answer to the interviewer's questions, so candidates can play some roles according to their own situation, or lead the topic to their own specialties. If the answer is too short, even shorter than the interviewer's question, sometimes the interview will be in an embarrassing situation.

7. Try to create a harmonious communication atmosphere. If your communication with the interviewer is limited to a mechanical question-and-answer method, sometimes the interview will come to a deadlock. In particular, your answer is shorter than the interviewer's question. When the interviewer needs to rack his brains to think about how to ask questions, the interview will often be very embarrassing. If the interviewer is not a very talkative person, the applicant should take the initiative to create a harmonious communication atmosphere. Interviewing in a pleasant environment will leave a good impression on both the interviewer and the applicant.

8. Asking the interviewer can better show your ability. During the interval between the interviewer and the applicant, the applicant should boldly ask the interviewer questions. The interviewer generally welcomes such questions, at least it shows the applicant's concern and initiative for the company and the interview. When the interview atmosphere is tense, candidates can also ease the interview atmosphere by asking questions.

candidates can ask any questions they care about, and of course, it is best to limit them to the questions involved in the recruitment. Asking questions aimlessly will affect the progress of the whole interview. It's best not to ask the interviewer "introduce the company" and other very general questions. The company usually has corresponding introduction materials and recruitment materials, so you can read them yourself. If the interviewer tells you again alone, I'm afraid most of them will explain a few words in a hurry, which will not achieve the effect of asking questions. If you can ask some good questions, you can better show your ability. It should be noted that after all, the interview should focus on the interviewer's questions, and can't usurp the host's role. Relax, so as to give the interviewer a better impression.