The collective resignation of the popular studio photography team was exploded, which was the contradiction between the founders. Why is it so difficult for founders to "get rich together"?

It's easier to fight a mountain than to defend one. It is precisely for this reason that when there are two or more founders, there will be contradictions in favoring one of them. When there is a flashpoint, it is the time when the team splits. Therefore, cooperation with others requires signing an agreement, or amending the supplementary agreement with the development of everyone's division of labor.

When I was a child, I was not sensible and always wanted to do business with my friends. But after entering the society, if you are really good friends. Several people shouldn't do business in partnership. Otherwise, the unclear dividend is not only the division of the team, but the most important thing is that the boat of friendship has really turned over! I read an opinion about Yu to the effect that it doesn't mean not doing business with good friends. But before two people start, they must put their own ugly words first. At first, they were embarrassed to say it, which was the main reason for the collapse between friends behind.

The popular studio photography team left collectively. Weibo said that the pursuit of different ideas does not rule out the existence of this kind of behavior, but I believe it is because of the uneven distribution of spoils, when the contradiction shield reaches a critical point, that is, when it is just right.

When the founder's team becomes formal, everyone's division of labor in different fields is different. The remuneration should also be changed. It is impossible to make corresponding adjustments according to the original contract, but with the rise of the team. The photography team of the popular studio worked hard to shoot, and finally the fame and fortune were swallowed up by Zhuo Wei alone, which would definitely cause contradictions, so it is not surprising that everyone broke up.

Not only this industry, but also other industries, * * * persisted in difficult times. However, the internal contradictions intensified in the normal direction because of the disproportionate division of responsibilities and dividends in the later period. Therefore, I agree with Yu's point of view. We do business together, and the dividends at each stage should be adjusted accordingly. According to everyone's contribution, the division of labor is different, and the pressure and responsibility are also different. Yes, the profit sharing signed at the beginning was changed, and the contradiction was solved as soon as it appeared, not irreconcilable.

In fact, the root cause of so many difficulties is interest. If the distribution of benefits was fair, these problems would not arise.