The director of Xi 'an Kindergarten said, "We don't accept rural baby, but only raise swans instead of pigs." what do you think?

Hello, everyone, I am Chaozai, a Chaozai who can only tell the truth and occasionally tell lies. "We don't accept country babies, but only raise swans instead of pigs". When I saw this sentence, I thought it was an animal drunk nonsense. But the animal who said this sentence is obviously sober, not drunk or nonsense, but naked discrimination. I have to say that the animal director himself is a pig.

The director of Xi 'an Kindergarten said, "We don't accept rural baby, but only raise swans instead of pigs." I have the following views on this beast.

I wonder which kindergarten in Xi 'an? I don't know what the beast who said this is like. I think he must be as ugly as the devil, but he is definitely not as terrible as the devil, but he is very annoying. Although he is human, he is a kindergarten teacher and director. But these titles have nothing to do with him at the moment he said this sentence. He has only one name, and that is the beast, a pig.

This animal itself is a pig, losing the face of Xi people, losing the faces of all directors and all teachers. In today's socialism, democracy and equality, someone should say such a thing. I really doubt whether his IQ is positive. If this sentence is hummed by animals, we may laugh it off, but this sentence comes from a kindergarten director, so he is undoubtedly interacting with animals.

"Only raise swans, not pigs" is naked contempt and discrimination. People who say such things are not people, but animals. Animals have no values and views on right and wrong, so only animals can say such things. He looks down on rural people and naturally looks down on rural children. His eyes are only fixed on the gold Lord in the city.

Like an animal, he looked at the city people with greedy eyes, looked at the city people's trouser pockets and looked at his food with greedy eyes, as if the gold owner was attracted to him with stinking money in his pocket. Therefore, when he said "only raise swans, not pigs", in fact, at that time, his heart was full of interests, money and a decent life in the city.

He looks down on rural people. He thinks that rural people are not as rich as urban people. He thinks that rural people like to haggle over every ounce and don't think about how money is earned at all. He even likes to flatter the children in the city and their parents, because they are his treasurers. What he thinks is not how to educate children at all, but how to get more benefits from parents. This reminds me of those animals that only wag their tails and beg for food from their owners! He's such an animal!

In today's society, people with a little IQ will not say such words that arouse public anger, and this sentence is not only aimed at local farmers in Xi' an, but also at farmers' friends all over the country! When he said this, he was not just an enemy of a parent, but of thousands of farmers' friends in Qian Qian.

If you kill him, I don't think he will survive the end of this year. Do you remember that friend's woman in the northeast of China is abroad? When she recorded a video of a Northeastern abroad and posted it on the Internet, it aroused the dissatisfaction and counterattack of all men in Northeast China. Today, with the rapid spread of the Internet, this boastful woman was finally killed by human flesh and committed suicide.

She committed suicide reluctantly, but after being bitten by human flesh, she felt stressed and committed suicide. Apologizing for death is also a kind of self-relief. For this beast in Xi 'an, if he is eaten by human flesh, he will not live to the end of the year. Of course, we don't want anyone to be a bad person, but he will be responsible for what he said and pay the price!

Anyway, as a farmer and a descendant of a farmer, I think every compatriot will arouse an inexplicable "murder" when he sees his boastful words. Today is a peaceful era and a democratic society. Although some things are indeed not peaceful and undemocratic, an individual who can openly be so arrogant can only say that such a person is not worthy of being a man. He is stupid and asked for it.

I just want to say that people with such values deserve to be teachers? Also worthy of engaging in noble teaching and educating people? It is no exaggeration to say that such a person is insane.

1, teacher's sorrow

Shouldn't being a teacher be teaching people to treat everyone equally? Shouldn't it be teaching people to establish a correct outlook on life and values? According to their distorted values, children are divided into "swans" and "pigs". This kind of values is completely discrediting the noble word "teacher" and it is also the sorrow of teachers.

2. Students' sadness

How terrible it is for a teacher who distorts values and outlook on life to preach and teach children like a blank sheet of paper. Children haven't the ability to distinguish right from wrong, so it's time to establish a correct outlook on life and values. Let such a teacher educate the children, once the children form this concept. The impact on children's lives will be enormous and lasting. A beautiful childhood, meeting such a teacher, is even more sad for students.

To sum up, teachers' improper words and deeds will deeply affect children's correct outlook on life and values.

Although this matter has passed for a long time, Wei Shi still wants to talk about it after seeing it today. Prior to this, the director of a kindergarten in Xi 'an said that he learned the technology of raising swans and could not raise pigs. She also said that if the cost is maintained at 1600 a month, many parents of students sell vegetables and fish, saying that they can't communicate. Of course, she always thought that what she said was the voice of most kindergarten teachers, and many people would support her, and then she was fired. I think what the kindergarten director said in the Xi case may be partly right. There will indeed be many people supporting her, and she has also expressed many people's voices. But this idea is wrong, this is a wrong idea. Why is master great? Because he teaches regardless of rank. Even those who sell vegetables and fish are socialist builders. They have also made a lot of contributions to society, and their children are worthy of your skill in raising swans. Besides, swans are like actors. Only from a distance can pork be truly converted into energy.

1, this director is of low quality, and his eyes are probably noisy and self-righteous. Even if she is a city dweller now, she won't be a farmer with four generations under one roof, will she?

Children in the city are not necessarily swans, but also ducks. Children in rural areas may not be "locals", but they may be students of Tsinghua Peking University in the future.

2. Now it is an economic market. You can run a high-end kindergarten if you have the strength and conditions. It is natural to charge high fees. If you have money, go to a better kindergarten, and if you don't have money, go to a worse kindergarten. This is a choice made by each parent according to his actual family situation. This idea of looking down on rural children is wrong. Whose children are not their own angels and whose children are not the future of the motherland?

In the 40 years since the reform, more and more farmers have lived a good life through their own efforts. The development of urbanization has also created a large number of relocated households and become "local tyrants". Now the conditions in rural areas are no worse than those in cities. Now, walking into the countryside, there are rows of villas and luxury cars.

In 40 years, everyone will become a city resident!

I don't think there is anything wrong with what the teacher or the director said. I also think that some so-called big coffees have some truth, but in the end, we should think about why people don't accept rural children just because they are poor. Thousands, tens of thousands of tuition fees, is it really that difficult?

If we think and experience from the quality level, the problem will be very clear.

I would like to ask, from the birth of a child to marriage, which parent can be a positive person every day, without fighting, quarreling or cheating? Who can do that? Who knows how long they will work without discriminating against vegetable sellers and fish buyers? The children are out of school. Study quietly or help? Or play around?

Environment is very important for children's growth. It is not the so-called parents who create the environment, but how parents maintain it. It's not that I am busy and need to earn money to support my family, so I can ignore the past. It is not men who earn money, but women who take care of children. Children's learning environment. It needs a family of three and thousands of families in Qian Qian to support it.

Don't embarrass other people's teachers, they are not easy either.

The children taught by such directors will definitely not be excellent! Probably look down on people like directors. Parents are advised to take their children to a new kindergarten as soon as possible.

The countryside is always laughed at. Is it a rural pot or a self-reliant person? Like the director, he thinks that leaving the countryside is superior, but he doesn't know how popular rural hukou is now.

I think what we should worry about is whether this idea will be passed on to the flowers of the motherland and whether flowers can get good quality education in kindergartens. Teaching first, a kindergarten director, is not a good person himself. How can he give children a good quality education? Kindergarten children have strong physical and mental development and acceptance! Don't let this kind of teacher harm the children who could have become useful!

First of all, I personally think that it is absurd and wrong if the kindergarten director really says, "We don't accept rural babies, only raise swans instead of pigs." Then the quality of this director must be much lower than that of rural children, even lower than that of gangsters in society. Why do you say that? It is feudal, backward and foolish to deliberately divide people into swans and pigs from the absurd and erroneous remarks released by the director. According to the logic of this director with extremely low social awareness, children in cities are swans and children in rural areas are pigs. This view itself is a process of anti-humanity, anti-human rights, anti-society and anti-urbanization, which hinders social progress, that is, the development and progress of human society. It is even more anti-civilization speech. That's nonsense.

At present, we are promoting urbanization to quickly narrow the gap between rural areas and cities, so that more farmers can become urban people and more rural children can enjoy equal and high-quality education like urban children. Not only kindergarten education, but also primary schools, junior high schools, senior high schools and even universities have equal rights and opportunities to receive education and enjoy the same balanced quality educational resources. At that time, there may be no difference between urban and rural areas, and there will be no so-called identity difference between rural children and urban children because of urban-rural differences and differences in educational resources. Just like developed countries, there is no difference between urban and rural areas, so there will be no difference in educational opportunities and levels between rural and urban children, and there will be no discrimination. With the rapid development of China's economy, the continuous progress of society and the continuous improvement of people's lives, the allocation of educational resources is more balanced, equal, fair and extensive. The trend of educational opportunities and educational level of rural and urban children is basically the same and homogeneous. I believe that our country is not far from this day.

More than forty years ago, we were a big agricultural country. According to statistics, more than 85% of the population lives in vast rural areas. In other words, our predecessors must have been to the countryside. Judging from the development history of human society, there are rural areas first, then cities. More than 200 years ago, new york was a shabby town. All the people living in the town came from the countryside. At that time, there was no concept of city people. Similarly, on the eve of the Opium War, Shanghai was also a very small town with a very small population. At that time, there was no concept of urban hukou, and there was no difference between urban and rural people. The Bund is a beach and looks very shabby. Now the Bund in Shanghai is the pride of city people. Isn't it beautiful? Today, the urban population exceeds 20 million. Having said that, although I am also a city dweller, my ancestors must have come from the countryside. To some extent, I am also a rural person, at least half a rural person. In other words, today, many people from the previous generation and ancestors of the city have come to the countryside. In other words, there is no city without countryside. This is highly consistent with the historical process of human development and irreversible. Back to the topic, the parents of the kindergarten director or her parents must also be rural people. According to this logical reasoning, the director is also a child of rural people, and she is also a pig. When she called rural children pigs, she also called herself a pig. Do you think my point of view is correct? Welcome to comment!

I feel very sad after reading this question. As an educator, it is incompetent to have such an ideological understanding. Although most of today's society pursues fame and fortune, in a kindergarten full of childlike innocence, a teacher who is a teacher by example said such things, such thoughts and understanding, such a level of speaking, such discriminatory remarks, which hurt everyone's hearts. It is doubtful what kind of example such a dean can set for children. For those children with poor family environment, what impression can they leave on his young mind? Such discriminatory remarks should be condemned by the whole society, and she should be responsible for her words and deeds. Unfortunately, our law has many shortcomings in this respect. Don't do to others what you don't want them to do to you, so don't say such discriminatory words again. Every time a child asks me why some children are so miserable, I tell him that this society is not a society where everyone is equal. Some families have a good environment and some have a poor environment, but children with poor environment are not inferior. Like us, they are all flowers of the motherland. You should pay more attention to these children. When you grow up, use your knowledge and talents to make our society more equal and friendly.

Recently, the language of "Ren Lei", the head of a kindergarten in Xi, has been heated up on the Internet. When I was talking, I was very unhappy to see such "shocking" words.

What happened to the children in the countryside? Shouldn't rural children go to good schools?

I come from the countryside and deeply understand the hardships of learning. Our parents brought us up with hardships, and it broke our hearts to learn. Whose parents don't want their children to go to better schools?

In recent years, China is in the stage of accelerated urbanization, and the proportion of urban population has exceeded half. In the city where I work, I met many migrant workers who went to work in the city. They run around for their children's study. I always thought they were the greatest parents in the world.

Without the hardships of farmers, how can we have plenty of food and clothing?

When I was a child, I read a poem-compassion for farmers;

When weeding is at noon,

Sweat dripped on the ground.

Who knows the Chinese food on the plate,

Every single grain is the fruit of hard work.

We are eating delicious rice and delicious food. Have we ever thought about the hardships of farmers? There are really too many things we don't know or ignore in this world. Why do thousands of tall buildings rise from the ground? Why is our city increasingly convenient? Because of them, migrant workers from rural areas!

Everyone has the right to choose a better education, and we should respect those rural parents who grow up for their children!

Please don't discriminate against rural children!

Confucius said, "The way to a university lies in virtue." Lu Xun said: "Education is to cultivate people." Cai Yuanpei said: "Education is to help the educated develop their own abilities, improve their own personality and do their part for human culture." Teaching and educating people is my teacher's responsibility. Every child is the future of the motherland. Please don't discriminate against children in rural areas.

I wonder if the kindergarten director's "shocking" language is in our nature or a slip of the tongue. I hope that every educator and everyone will care about the education and growth of rural children, especially those in poverty-stricken areas.