Meituan was awarded compensation of 352,000 yuan. What happened to meituan?

Recently, the US Mission was fined 352,000, which shocked many people. I don't know what happened. Why was Meituan sentenced to so much money?

1. Last August, Meituan Platform pushed some information to his merchants to discredit Hungry Platform.

There is also news that businesses that require cooperation with him can no longer cooperate with Hungry, but only with the US Mission itself. Regarding this matter, the Intermediate People's Court of Jinhua City, Zhejiang Province made a judgment on this matter. The judgment held that the Jinhua branch of Beijing Sankuai Technology Co., Ltd., namely Meituan Group, did have unfair competition behavior, which damaged the legitimate rights and interests of Hungry Company, and Meituan should bear corresponding civil liabilities, so the court fully supported Hungry Company's request for compensation for economic losses of 6,543.8+0,000 yuan.

2. According to Article 12 of the Law of People's Republic of China (PRC) on Anti-Unfair Competition, the unfair competition of Meituan in the field of take-away food was identified as an infringement case.

Therefore, it is judged that Meituan Company needs to compensate the hungry company for 352,000 yuan.

Third, the state does not support this monopolistic behavior of Meituan Company.

The problem that Meituan forces users to choose between the two is a blatant violation and destruction of the current market competition order. This behavior of Meituan limited the market competition, curbed the innovation and development of merchants, and seriously damaged the relevant interests of operators and consumers in the platform. This incident has caused great harm and must be strictly and resolutely eradicated.

As a merchant, Meituan needs to respect the independent choice of the operators in the platform, rather than forcing its merchants to make choices through unreasonable restrictions and other measures. You can't engage in unfair competition and some price violations. We must support the law enforcement work of the market supervision department and accept the supervision of the broad masses of the society.