Jilin citizens said they refused to accept the online loan business and were scolded. Unicom: The swearing person has left. Is the company responsible?

The company must be responsible for this, because this abusive person is an employee of this company. First of all, when recruiting employees, the company must know their actual situation, as well as their personality and ability. Secondly, when they ask employees to call in the future, they must be trained to let them know how to communicate with customers and how to sell to others. No matter whether others accept your suggestion or not, you can only accept it silently, because now you are going to find someone else to do things, and the result is still scolding others.

There are really too many of these things. Online lending is a particularly annoying thing. Many people especially dislike these two words. Now you ask someone to borrow online loans. Any normal person will refuse this matter, and people certainly don't want to borrow the money. As a result, I didn't expect people not to borrow it, but you called names. Who are you to call names? For such a person, I think it's really a bit too much. Doesn't mean the company can fire him. Doesn't this company know the character and virtue of its employees first? How to recruit such a person? How does such a person treat customers?

Now there are many companies or units that are like this. Once something goes wrong, fire this person, and then put all the responsibility on them, as if it had nothing to do with their company or their unit. How is that possible? This person is an employee of your company and your unit, so their words and deeds represent the company and the unit. So I think this company must be responsible, or is this scolded person too wronged? People just don't want to borrow online loans, and the result is inexplicably scolded by others, which is really irritating.