Emerson's interview experience: two cases zz

Emerson's interview experience: two cases zz

Emerson's interview experience: two cases zz

I received an interview notice from Emerson at 4 o'clock yesterday afternoon. I had my first business interview at 9 o'clock this morning. In the evening, I borrowed a suit from my classmates, found out the tie and got ready. At eight o'clock in the morning, I went for an interview with a classmate in the electronics department. The environment there is very good, and it is close to the lake and has a good scenery. This makes me feel comfortable, but when I face a business interview, I really don't know what to do.

Finally, at 9: 00, hrmm will group the respondents. I was in the second group with about 20 people. Hrmm gave each person two pieces of paper and 1 pen. I didn't feel very good at that time, because I didn't know the purpose of these papers and pens, and I was a little nervous: p Fortunately, hrmm began to introduce ourselves, and then let us use paper as our name labels. Next, hrmm asks everyone to introduce themselves in order. Unfortunately, I got too close to hrmm. The second introduced himself, feeling a little nervous and speaking a little fast. He introduced his academic situation and social activities, and basically highlighted his own advantages. After everyone introduced us. Hrmm tells us the purpose of the second piece of paper. Let everyone write a topic, write down their professional name and school, and then close it to hrmm. Only then did I understand what hrmm meant. It was really stupid. _ The topic I chose was given by my brother who majored in marketing in Tongcheng Brothers College: As the boss of Emerson Company, I would like to give a welcome speech for the arrival of new employees! Everyone can raise their hands when they are ready to speak. I was the third to raise my hand. The requirement is three minutes. I will speak for more than two minutes. After this impromptu speech, let's take a five-minute break.

After that, hrmm announced the list of the second round of interviews. At this time, there are only eight people left, and the group draws lots for debate. It's a pity that the topic I drew is as the opposite party: can personality determine fate? Both sides are required to make 1 defense statement and 4 defense summary. Originally, I wanted to make four defenses, but unfortunately, a brother spoke and had to make two defense statements casually. Generally speaking, the other side is quick-witted and clear-headed, and we are all too gentle and polite, and we have always been at a disadvantage in momentum. Later, I talked a little more, but there were also many loopholes, which gave the other side many opportunities to attack. Finally, hrmm requires to summarize each other and recommend the best debaters from both sides. Two of them recommended me, and several others and I recommended four debaters of the other side.

At the end of this speech, it was dissolved. Turn on the phone and look at the watch. It's already 1 1 o'clock. Two hours have passed. Hrmm told us that if it passed, we would send a message within 2 days. Today's summary of myself is: in the future, we should pay attention to choosing the right time, slowing down the speaking speed appropriately, strengthening the language organization ability and paying more attention to cooperation.

B.

Emerson is a company I never knew before I applied for a job. I didn't try to interview him until I saw his recruitment information on ChinaHR.

I only know the following points about Emerson at present. Emerson Electric is a Fortune 500 company and the second largest electric company in North America after General Electric. Like many big companies, it has many subsidiaries and joint ventures all over the world. Most of the recruits in China are Emerson Network Energy Co., Ltd. (Emerson Network Energy Co., Ltd.). It is also a subsidiary of Emerson, formerly known as Huawei's AXA power supply (acquired by $6 billion), and its main business is manufacturing communication power supply. Although it is a top 500 foreign company, the working language and working environment are not much different from those of state-owned enterprises. The boss is Steven, an ABC, and others are basically Huawei's original team. But there are many differences with Huawei now. First, because the profit margin of power products is relatively high, the company pays well, especially in sales, so the treatment is not a problem. Then, there is no need to go to the so-called overseas hardship areas, and the company culture has also integrated the elements of foreign companies, which is still relatively humanized. Therefore, it is good for an undergraduate to enter the marketing department, at least for me.

Everything starts with online investment. Emerson's online investment is based on its own website, which is relatively simple. In addition to the basic information, there are several simple opening questions. Personally, I think the selection criteria of marketing department mainly depend on comprehensive quality, and don't pay much attention to English ability and achievement. I also passed the screen smoothly.

The interview I * * *, there are four rounds, in Shangri-La. It is much more generous than Huawei in the pattern, and hrmm is also very good-looking, which really makes me have to say that the recruitment of the top 500 companies is different.

The interview will be conducted in batches. 10 inform me of the batches. I came to the banquet hall at 9: 30, and now I am waiting in a room next to the interview hall. There are snacks and tea on the table, which makes people feel comfortable. Wait until around 10: 20, and I go in. The interview format is group interview, once 10 people. I don't remember the numbers here. This is also my first time to attend a group meeting, and I'm still a little nervous. The interview is like this. Everyone writes his name on his chest with a note for interview management. Then everyone introduced themselves for a minute and a half. After meeting so many companies, I have become proficient, but I still haven't grasped the time and finished it. Most people in the back have made such mistakes, so I suggest that comrades who are going to interview in the future can practice more time-limited projects. After that, everyone wrote a speech topic on the note and collected it, which disrupted the time for everyone to take a speech topic for 3 minutes. The topic I drew is very abnormal, "Hero", I don't know who wrote it, but it's difficult anyway, hehe. But I feel good about myself. The main idea is that modern heroes should sharpen their teeth without showing their faces. The interviewer nodded several times. This kind of interview, I think it is necessary to reach a tacit understanding, don't ask too difficult questions, it is also difficult for yourself to embarrass others.

On the one hand, people will not be eliminated. There will be two parties in the afternoon, and the two parties will have a group meeting. There will be 10 people at a time, and the debate will be divided into two groups. Before the debate, the materials will be discussed in groups and a main debater will be selected. This kind of interview has advantages and disadvantages. The advantage is that there are more opportunities to perform, and the disadvantage is that it is difficult and easy to make mistakes. Discussion is also an examination item, and the interviewer will observe your performance in the discussion. In the discussion, don't let others talk, you can't talk all the time, and you can't say nothing. I played the role of organizer in the discussion, collecting everyone's opinions, properly expounding my own opinions and summarizing everyone's opinions. A girl in our group insisted on being the main debater, and several graduate students and I readily agreed. During the debate, I mainly sat inside and fought back when I found the loopholes in the other side, and my performance was still very good. On the contrary, it is the girl who wants to stand out from the crowd. She didn't finish the task of arguing well and made many mistakes.

After two sides, the remaining half. According to my observation, all of them are very sophisticated. There are few strong ones left, and some are very powerful, hehe. The three parties are still a group, and the project analysis is also a group of five people. Firstly, the project is studied and discussed, and at the same time, the role is assigned, and the project manager and various roles are selected. Then the project manager 1 minute and a half will make a statement on the division of labor and overall arrangement of the project, and then the heads of each part will make a statement on their work plans for one minute. I can't remember why I became a project manager now. Maybe when discussing with me, I still adopted the strategy of being an organizer. It is very difficult to be a project manager because the team members don't know each other because they have no previous experience in project analysis. 1.5 minutes is too difficult to explain all the problems (it is strongly not recommended to be a project manager). I didn't play well, so I naturally lost the election after three rounds.

Emerson's interview is mainly group interview, P & amp； The interview method in g's example is so different. After losing the election, I was very depressed and unbalanced. The so-called strengths and weaknesses, I feel that I can't integrate into the group, and my shortcomings can't escape. All three rounds were group meetings, but my strength was that I didn't have the opportunity to explain my abilities and what I did to the interviewer one-on-one. When I knew there was one-on-one around me, I couldn't sit still any longer and decided to be king. Bullying the face is easier than I thought. I just went to the hrmm who was in charge of signing in during the interview and told her that I wanted a chance to let the company know me better. Hrmm said happily that it can be arranged if time permits. Fortunately, I came early, so my friends behind me were not so lucky. When all the people on the list were finished, I confidently walked into the interview room, with two tables, hrmm in front, two bosses in the back, and the boss's face in front. I told all the bosses what I should say. The bosses are very grateful. The questions are all old ones, such as your strengths and weaknesses. What do you think is your biggest failure? The only question I am not prepared for is what is the success factor. My answer is: correctly judge the problems you face and do the right thing. After that, go to the front desk and talk to hrmm about some requirements about signing a contract and working, such as your family situation, workplace requirements and so on.

Finally got the offer, and the conclusion is that persistence is victory:)

Generally speaking, Emerson's recruitment is still very good and atmospheric, but the group face is a little uncomfortable, so it is recommended to prepare in advance.