Why is the contempt chain in colleges and universities a disguised theory of origin?

A recent article entitled "Sorry, my undergraduate course is not from Peking University! The article became popular on the Internet. The author's name is Ding Peng, and he graduated from Chinese Department of Peking University with a master's degree. He graduated from the Department of Management Engineering of Huaqing College of Xi University of Architecture and Technology with a bachelor's degree. Member of Chinese Writers Association, currently editor-in-chief of Poetry magazine.

Ding Peng said in the article that Gong Zizhen called for "I urge God to renew his spirit and drop talents in an eclectic way" a hundred years ago. Why is there a so-called contempt chain in colleges and universities today? Sorry, I'm not from Peking University! But my undergraduate course is also my youth, the wealth of my life and my alma mater. I like it, too. I won't sell myself short because of outside influence, and I won't forget my ancestors because of outside influence.

The so-called contempt chain in colleges and universities refers to "Qingbei > 985 > 2 1 1 > one book > two books > three books > specialized courses". In recent years, although the state has issued a policy prohibiting the appearance of "985/2 1 1" in recruitment, there are still many units that put up the signboard of "No recruitment unless it is 985/2 1 1".

Even if it is not explicitly stated, this contempt chain will still be hidden in the hearts of employers. Moreover, it is conceivable that this reality will not change much because of an article by Ding Peng. The so-called contempt chain still exists in colleges and universities, and it will exist for a long time.

The essence of contempt chain in colleges and universities is a disguised theory of origin, which is manifested in academic qualifications. Its disadvantages are obvious. It will affect or even destroy the academic environment of freedom, fairness and innovation, and it will also restrict and restrict the space for the growth and development of all kinds of talents, and even become a catalyst for the solidification of the class.

However, the formation of contempt chain in colleges and universities is not groundless, but has its own rationality. The reputation and status accumulated by famous schools for a long time has become a "well-known trademark" in the talent market, which is also a guarantee of talent quality to a certain extent. Employers go straight to famous brands, which not only reduces the cost of finding and inspecting talents, but also reduces the risk of employing people and improves their reputation. Why not do it?

On the other hand, the capital needed by talents in competition must be obtained through certain education and training. Undeniably, the teachers' level and academic environment of famous schools are above average as a whole. Studying here, you get rich capital, and your competitiveness in the talent market will naturally improve. Apart from the consideration of family changes, this may be an important reason why Ding Peng is bent on being admitted to Peking University.

As the old saying goes, the hero doesn't ask the source, and wealth should be the reason. When the protagonist also wants to ask the source, how to break this chain of contempt hidden in the hearts of colleges and universities?

In fact, real heroes are not afraid to ask the source. It is "heroes are not afraid of being too thin, and they will be proud if they have ambition." Yes, it's a hero. No, a hero. Because whether a hero is a hero or not depends on the source, and the source is not a necessary condition to measure a hero.

The key to breaking the contempt for colleges and universities lies not in the eyes of others, but in colleges and students. On the one hand, colleges and universities should recruit talents, catch up, strive to create an atmosphere of academic research, and improve their academic ability and status. On the other hand, they should increase their investment in teaching, train every student attentively, and regard students as the hope of the school, not the ATM. Of course, it takes a long time for the school to sharpen a sword every ten years.