Present situation of bidding for property management projects

The gradual improvement of property management bidding policy has further broadened the property management market. First of all, the bidding policy fundamentally regulates the property management market and makes it compete fairly in an equal environment. Thereby encouraging and promoting the healthy growth of a number of collective and private enterprises, and gradually realizing the goal of marketization of property management. In addition, the implementation of the bidding system and the intensification of market competition have improved the service quality of property management enterprises and urged them to approach the perfect goal. As a new form of market competition, property management bidding has its own characteristics.

Existing problems: the main body of the property market is not standardized, commercial bribery exists in the field of property undertaking, problems exist in the construction authorities and regulatory authorities, and so on.

First, the main body of the property rights market is not standardized:

The behavior of owners of property projects is not standardized, which is mainly manifested in avoiding bidding, colluding with bidding, openly bidding but secretly deciding, forcing the winning bidder to sign a "yin-yang contract" and other issues. The behavior of bidding property service enterprises is not standardized, which is mainly manifested in the lack of integrity of bidding property service enterprises and fraudulent means to win the bid; The self-discipline of the industry is poor, and collusion in bidding and accompanying bids occur from time to time; Vicious competition, low-priced bidding. Moreover, because the bidding property service enterprises belong to the vulnerable groups, they often dare not take legal measures to safeguard their legitimate rights and interests in the bidding process. Although they know that they have been treated unfairly, they are also afraid of adverse effects on future project bidding in order to win over property projects.

Some property bidding agencies have poor integrity, irregular behavior and poor service awareness. The main manifestations are: unable to strictly enforce laws and regulations, colluding with owners and bidding property enterprises to engage in false bidding and dismembering contracted property projects; Agency beyond the scope of qualification to undertake and affiliated agency business; The level of agency employees is uneven, and the comprehensive quality and professional level need to be further improved.

A few bid evaluation experts lack professional ethics and do not stress honesty. Mainly manifested in the lack of due diligence and hasty bid evaluation; Collusion with "affiliated enterprises" driven by interests, giving them high marks and affecting the evaluation results. The positioning of the property market is not clear. Some property markets belong to real estate enterprises, some are independent property service enterprises, and some have repeated property undertaking problems, resulting in waste of resources and insufficient business undertaking.

Second, commercial bribery in the real estate sector.

At present, China is in an important period of industrialization and urbanization, and the state has invested heavily in urban construction and infrastructure construction. Urban construction involves land transfer, engineering construction, real estate development and related administrative examination and approval management, bank credit and so on. These fields and links have become the high-incidence parts of commercial bribery crimes. Commercial bribery crimes in the field of property undertaking involve a wide range and many links, mainly involving property undertaking planning approval, market access, property management bidding and so on. The existence of the above problems has very serious consequences and great harm, which seriously undermines the fair competition order in the property market and poses hidden dangers to the quality of property services and property safety. Commercial bribery in the field of property undertaking directly affects the market environment, and even forms a "hidden rule" of "no gift, no project" and "no gift, no bid", which corrupts the social atmosphere and is not conducive to building a harmonious society.

Third, the problems existing in the construction department and supervision department

The competent department of construction, as the administrative department in charge of bidding activities, should strictly enforce the law and act according to the basic construction procedures. However, some places vigorously promote local and departmental protectionism, exclude foreign construction enterprises from entering the local tangible market, and set up various obstacles, such as applying for bidding permission, narrowing the scope of announcement, shortening the bidding time, paying registration fees, management fees, and huge deposits. This discourages foreign construction enterprises. In the long run, the technical level of local construction enterprises is backward and the construction technology cannot be mastered. Some departments are still accustomed to administrative examination and approval, and the supervision, guidance and service of project bidding activities are obviously insufficient, even replacing supervision with examination and approval, which infringes on the bidding autonomy of construction units. Some departments and local administrative leaders intercede for specific enterprises and individuals by greeting and handing notes, which interferes with normal bidding activities.

As the supervision subject of bidding activities, the supervision department should strictly check whether the actions of all parties in bidding are in line with the bidding procedures and legal. However, in some places, supervisors participate in bid evaluation and become judges, both as referees and athletes, which makes the bid evaluation in an unsupervised state, providing opportunities for other judges to manipulate and operate behind the scenes, which makes the bidding activities unable to truly embody the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality.

References and links:

1. Analysis of bidding for property management projects:/view/13621afefab069dc50220115.html;

2. Summary of the research on property management bidding:/view/3b90502b0066f5335a812149.html.