Suv recruitment

For the vast number of young people after 90 s and 00 s, their budget for buying a car for the first time will certainly not be too high, but they also have higher requirements for the intelligence and handling performance of vehicles. Then, the entry-level SUV model will be a good choice for them.

Therefore, we decided to make a cross-comment on several popular130,000-class SUVs, such as Fenglanda, XR-V, Hacker and Ge Tan, to see who is the king of value for entry-level SUVs.

Compared with comfortable experience, who is the first choice for young families to buy a car at a premium?

Appearance design is the first impression that a vehicle attracts consumers. As a young product, the four models have some eye-catching performances in design. Flanders pays more attention to the front face, and the huge lower grille with blackened design highlights the sense of movement of the whole vehicle. As a veteran player in this market segment, XR-V adopts exquisite design, and the back door also adopts hidden door handle design. "Hacker" and "Song of Exploration" still retain the family design language, while adding young and refined design details.

In terms of body size, comparing the data of four cars comprehensively, the length, width and height of Vlanda 4485* 1825* 1620mm are better than competitors, and the wheelbase of 2640mm is also in the leading position at the same level. The size of the car body does bring a better ride experience to Flanders. After entering the car, you can find that the second row roof has also been carefully designed, and the height of the second row car of Fenglanda has been raised to 980mm, and the overall comfort has been greatly improved.

On the whole, Fenglanda makes good use of the advantages of body size and brings better interior space performance in competing products of the same level. And from the space design details such as the roof design, we can see that Toyota models have considerate design considerations, which many competing products at the same level do not have.

Compared with functional configuration, whose configuration is more valuable and understands young people better?

In ordinary car life, young people will have a higher pursuit of vehicle function configuration, especially in intelligence, so intelligent configuration is also the focus of this cross-evaluation.

In terms of configuration performance, all four models are equipped with basic intelligent configurations such as LCD instrument and mobile phone interconnection, and they are all equipped. However, in terms of functionality and configuration richness, the advantages of Flanders and Ge Tan are particularly obvious. Taking Fenglanda as an example, the vehicle adopts the combination of 9-inch central control panel and 7-inch LCD instrument, and also supports the mobile phone interconnection of HiCar/CarPlay/CarLife platform, which basically meets more than 95% of the current mobile phone in-vehicle interconnection requirements. Moreover, the 4G car-to-car network provided by Fenglanda greatly expands the functionality and entertainment of the car-to-car system, and the OTA remote upgrade can ensure that the car-to-car system is often used and updated.

In addition to intelligent configuration, safety configuration is also an important criterion to measure a car. After a circle of actual comparison, in terms of basic safety configuration such as airbags, tire pressure monitoring, reversing radar, etc., Fenglanda is obviously superior to competing products, and it is worth mentioning that all Fenglanda comes standard with 7 airbags, with a high allocation of 9 airbags, which is indeed much more conscience than other competing models.

In terms of active safety configuration, there are only two of the four models, namely, T-PILOT intelligent driving assistance carried by Flanders and Honda SENSING driving assistance system of XR-V, both of which have reached L2-level automatic driving in terms of functionality. Moreover, the active safety of the two cars is almost standard in all departments, which also allows consumers who buy cars to avoid too many dilemmas of active safety and higher budget.

Compared with power control, who can bring more value-added and surging driving experience?

After investigation, it is found that many young users also have high pursuit of driving experience, such as more surging power of vehicles, more accurate pointing and more flexible chassis, which have become important factors affecting consumers' choice.

By comparing the power parameters of several cars, it can be found that the power performance of Fenglanda is obviously better in book data. Thanks to the displacement advantage of this 2.0L engine, its maximum power reaches 126kW, which has obvious power advantage compared with Ge Tan's 1.4T engine or hacker's 2.0L engine with the same displacement.

Of course, the driving and handling performance of the vehicle is not solely determined by power, and the chassis and gearbox also play a vital role. After the actual test drive experience, it can be clearly felt that all four models have made great efforts in handling, good vibration filtering and accurate head pointing, which is completely different from the feeling of sailing in classic cars. Among them, Fenglanda, as a model under the TNGA framework, obviously left a deeper impression on us.

In addition to the advantages of power output, Flanders' matched direct shift -CVT gearbox makes the power output of the whole vehicle smoother and more linear, and there is no sense of frustration during driving. It is worth mentioning that in the face of low-speed start, XR-V and hacker who are also equipped with CVT gearbox obviously feel that the low-torque power output is insufficient, while Fenglanda does not have this problem.

Through the fierce driving of these four cars, the performance of each car in the limit state is obviously different, and as a Flanders under TNGA architecture, it does show the handling performance that meets our expectations. Thanks to TNGA's low center of gravity design and high rigid structure, Flanders' chassis integrity is obviously stronger in emergency lane changes such as elk test, and the minimum turning radius of 5.2m makes it easier to pass when facing sharp turns and U-turns.

Of course, for most consumers, I still hope to have a model with lower daily travel costs. After comparison, we found that the fuel consumption performance is still the lowest in Flanders, and its comprehensive fuel consumption per 100 kilometers is only 5.7L L L. Although the vehicle engine has a large displacement, it is superior to its engine thermal efficiency of 40%, and the engine compression ratio 13: 1 has reached the leading level in the same class.

Through all-round static comparison and multi-scene test drive experience, it is not difficult to see that GAC Toyota Fenglanda is indeed better. It is expected that it will gain more sales in the market with its excellent intelligent configuration, leapfrog power, conscience safety configuration and space design.

This article is from the author of Icano. Pepper cart, copyright belongs to the author. Please contact the author in any form. The content only represents the author's point of view and has nothing to do with the car reform.