I'm a copywriter. When I was interviewing for a job, I encountered this situation several times: let me write a soft article to the other company first, or do a copy.

Yes, I saw what others said. A little extreme. I took an examination of the planning department, the design department and the planning department. I made the planning copy myself at the earliest. Let me answer it. Recruiters let copywriters write plans or soft articles, mainly depending on whether the writing is smooth and the thinking is clear. As for whether it is to the point, it is not important, because it is normal for the interviewer not to know about the company and products, and he can master it through guidance and guidance after entering the company.

Recruitment copywriting is not required. When interviewing, I usually think there are two ways to use it: one is to dictate a copy I wrote before, and the other is to quote a wonderful advertisement I saw in the local area. Fortunately, these two methods are aimed at experienced and inexperienced people respectively. I believe in my eyes and feelings, and a good copy is good in nine cases out of ten (the interviewer can also see the habit of writing on the blackboard when filling out the form, which is also very important for the copy). It's just my habit. I met a manager who specializes in copywriting, and he was excellent. His habit is that the interviewer writes a copy, improvises a copy, advertises, internal announcements, product promotion, etc. His criteria are first (positive) and second (smooth).

It is not good for an interpreter to cheat a manuscript from an interviewer, and neither can the company. If you are afraid that the opportunity will not pass, I will teach you a trick: just write an outline, and then select a few key points to hand in. Real employers only look at writing and thinking, and won't ask why you haven't finished writing. From Q user: Mr. Yang